Why Do People Who Say It Is Never OK To Lie Support Obama?

Lies, and the lying liars who tell them. You guys must like hacking on oneanother.

And your own purity of character is so admirable.

Lies, and the lying liars who tell them. You guys must like hacking on oneanother. Originally Posted by MrThom

that idiot WTF lied about his believing that even if you believe what you are saying you are lying.... if its incorrect
Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

If someone convinced me that you could fly by flapping your arms would you believe that I was lying or telling the truth when I tried to convince you to fly? If you think I was telling the truth, climb up on the Empire State Building and test out my 'truthful' proclamation.


Webster's 1913 Dictionary





Ly´ing
p. pr. & v 1. of Lie, to tell a falsehood.


lying1


[lahy-ing] /ˈlaɪ ɪŋ/ SpellSyllables

• Examples
• Word Origin

noun 1. the telling of lies, or false statements; untruthfulness:

I CROWN THEE KING LIAR.......................



Originally Posted by Whirlaway

THe LAST KING OF KENYA ! ! !

Sure, the Republicans lie, too, but why would a poster here take such a strong stand against (other people) lying, yet always support Obama? One could say that anyone with that position would likely be lying about hating lying, wouldn't one? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

they have a good Olying teacher...

When did we become a fucking forum on the State School intranet?

I thought the state would nevER let their "guests" have access to anything as provocative as a HOOKER board!

AssupLiar, your lying. You did say it is never OK to lie. So, we're you lying then, or lying now? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You have NO game Whiny. Rhetorical questions and FTFY.

You really ought to hang em up. You're way to stale to play.

You are lying AssupLiar. Typical lying hypocrite. And you won't answer the question.

What am I lying about? Quote it, chapter and verse. You're making shit up again, Whiny.

Exactly which question, Whiny? The question that had no answer, or the answer that had no question? Which one? Both? Either?

Obviously you've no leg to stand on. That's because you spend your days on your KNEES!

So how many soldiers died when Bush lied?

Listen guy. Some forms of lying is fundamental to our safety and security and as citizens we should not know and be privy to everything. I give Democrats more credit because they don't run on a religious platform of family values while constantly arguing with people on a hooker site.

So how many soldiers died when Bush lied? Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

Oh gwad....what lie was that?

Take you your pic dumbass:


"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to
develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them.
That is our bottom line."
- President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is
clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's
weapons of mass destruction program."
- President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a
great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will
use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies
is the greatest security threat we face."
- Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten
times since 1983."
- Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with
the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including,
if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to
respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its
weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom
Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of
mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the
region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
-Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of
mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has invigorated his weapons
programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear
programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In
addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is
doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop
longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our
allies." Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and
others, December 5, 2001

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and
a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the
mandated of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass
destruction and the means of delivering them."
- Sen. Carl Levin (D, MI), Sept. 19, 2002

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and
chemical weapons throughout his country."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible
to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as
Saddam is in power."
- Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and
developing weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are
confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and
biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course
to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities.
Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
- Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein
because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass
destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working
aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear
weapons within the next five years ... We also should remember we
have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in
development of weapons of mass destruction."
- Sen. Jay Rockefeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11
years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he
disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any
nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do" Rep.
- Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports
show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and
biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his
nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to
terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if
left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity
to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to
develop nuclear weapons."
- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that
Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing
capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass
destruction."
- Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL), Dec. 8, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to
miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to
his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass
destruction is real."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

^ whatever you say chief headcase lol

So, InZanybore, it's OK for the government to lie to us, is that right? How is it possible to maintain a representative government when we allow, tolerate, and even reward politicians who lie to us? I will even help you and AssupLiar with the answer: WE CAN'T! It is not possible. We are not a free country if we allow our leaders to lie to us. The Constitution cannot, and has not, withstand the assault of dishonest leaders.

^ whatever you say chief headcase lol Originally Posted by Zanzibar789

Dali is correct, and such facts obviously make you quite peevish, zany.