I usually agree with that GFE as well but I had a lot if people say that with GFE they are looking for kissin and intimate experience more them bbbj. And I have some says they want bbbj that's why I use lite GFE because I am a Covered provider. I have been know to feed off the energy of my date if they want Nasty sloppy fuck feast I'm just as great at that as I am at an immensely intimate and passionate session. I think some times hobbyst do put us in a category an get aught up on acronyms and what they think girl will n won't do based on opinion. Thats why I love those review so you can read the experience not the activities. But to each there own. I guess ....... thanks for feed back everyone. Still no solid answer but I do appreciate everyone's opinions Originally Posted by Rylee_rayeIf you don't offer BBBJ, then it's neither PSE or GFE. Both of those have BBBJ as pretty much a standard item offered. PSE is a much wilder/slutty fuck. GFE is more sensual. BBFS is not part of the definition of either of them. Some guys may try to say that to see if a provider will offer it, but it's never been the case that pse = bbfs.
CBJ's should be outlawed thoughI have a feeling that if this guy happens to be your Congressman, he would be happy to sponsor such a Bill...I may write to my congressman to see if he can get a bill started for that. Originally Posted by Sleepy363
I don't care about PSE. The litany of acronyms is not as important as a welcoming attitude, a clean, safe and comfortable location and a little IOP. A kind and happy provider who can suspend reality for an hour and make me think she's happy to be naked with me is valuable indeed. Well, maybe I lied a little about the acronyms-cbj is just a nonstarter for me. Just saying. Originally Posted by JackbrokerI like your way of thinking.. I have a question though.. In your opinion.. if a provider is more porn star like, does it make you think it is scripted or not coming from a natural place?