I appreciate your honesty. This is why I don't haggle with providers. Although I will haggle buying a car, etc. With providers, if you want more than a warm fuck hole, whether they admit it or not, often performance suffers. They mentally only give you "B" service.
I forgot to add, Haggling and trying to find discounts and specials. If it is asked of me (the rare times I do accept) I am never as good as I would have been otherwise. Particularly because I am liable to book a second date on that day to make up for the discounted date. Generally it does put a damper on the mood and will bring out insecurities in the most confident of ladies. Nothing ruins the mood more than thinking "am I only worth xxx amount? Am I doing a good or bad thing for taking this discounted date? How will I decline him in the future?"
Discounted dates also come with the burden of not being able to provide the ideal atmosphere I prefer. I want to have chilled wine waiting, possibly a small platter of fruit with optional whipped cream. Lit candles. A new music set purchased with him in mind, a new piece of lingerie debuted for him alone (probably why my lingerie has overrun my closet) perfectly manicured nails and toes. ect. I have to cut costs to accommodate and the mood suffers for this. Originally Posted by JayceeRivers
Great post - SketchballThe latter is the main reason why I no longer offer 1 hour arrangements. I would receive calls from men that tried to haggle my rate and would get upset when I told them I could not honor their request.
Too be clear there is a big difference big difference negotiating overnights, trips and "arrangements" than calling and haggling over an hourly rate with a woman you've never seen before. Apples and oranges. The former is pretty normal and not perceived negatively if done politely; the latter no so well... Originally Posted by atlcomedy
In both cases, I had a fantastic time and do not think the negotiation affected the date, although I do admit both providers were open to negotiation. I respect the fact that some providers may be offended if I tried to negotiate and they are free to not see me if I try, but to me telling "I'll be offended if you negotiate" is just as overly-idealistic and out of touch with reality as having a policy that says something like "Boys wear blue; girls wear pink--if you show up in anything other than a baby blue polo shirt, we can't see each other." I think a more appropriate tact for the ladies would be identifying if this is a greed issue or a confidence issue.
If it's a confidence issue that someone thinks you aren't worth $X.00, I have a lot of sympathy, but I also note there are a lot of things a provider could allow herself to be insecure about, and part of your job is learned to accept and even be proud of those insecurities. It could just be he's on a budget, or indeed he may not think you're worth that price. But don't allow yourself to feel bad because someone is negotiating. Negotiating is so natural for a lot of people: it's nothing to be offended about.You should take that a a mark of pride that people are willing to negotiate for you instead of have X off backpage for the price they offered you: they find you the better provider. So you should be honored, even if their offer is below what you would normally accept.
If it's a greed issue, I have no sympathy: learn economics and your real worth. If you identify yourself as a "premium brand," then question if your reviews truly reflect you as a premium brand. If they don't, then you have a decision to make. You can keep trying to charge Rolex prices for your Casio watch and go out of business, or you can admit to yourself that you aren't Rolex and make a successful business selling Casio watches. The choice is yours. If those reviews do mark you as a premium brand, then understand everyone always wants a Rolex for cheap, say no thanks to the negotiation and move on. Originally Posted by sketchball82
Great post - SketchballBINGO!
Too be clear there is a big difference big difference negotiating overnights, trips and "arrangements" than calling and haggling over an hourly rate with a woman you've never seen before. Apples and oranges. The former is pretty normal and not perceived negatively if done politely; the latter no so well... Originally Posted by atlcomedy
I disagree in regards to accepting ones insecurities being part of her job. Our job is to provide a pleasurable experience. If we have insecurities it is best to not offer them up on the gentleman's time. I also believe that if one is insecure about something they should work to find security. If they don't like their body, exercise and diet. If they feel cheap, raise their donation. If they feel used and like a wet hole, target a new audience. Originally Posted by JayceeRiversFair enough. But I can't control the way you feel. I mean, a provider that thinks she's a dirty blonde may be offended if I tell her she has the most beautiful light brunette hair I've ever seen. She might be offended by telling her she has the "sexiest curves I've ever seen" because she ideally wants to be an ironing board. My point is I can try to keep you happy, but ultimately it's on you to actually be happy.
Fair enough. But I can't control the way you feel. I mean, a provider that thinks she's a dirty blonde may be offended if I tell her she has the most beautiful light brunette hair I've ever seen. She might be offended by telling her she has the "sexiest curves I've ever seen" because she ideally wants to be an ironing board. My point is I can try to keep you happy, but ultimately it's on you to actually be happy.The thing is, this is a two way road. Consider for a moment with me, the feelings gentlemen have on "upcharges" By your own statement you could either hold a hypocritical stance and say no she should not upcharge but it is okay for the gentleman to negotiate. OR it is impolite of the lady to not already have a firm statement of what she wanted for the date in advance.
I think to a large degree that extends to the discussion we're having. It's not my responsibility or within my ability to make you feel secure or to take an innocent discussion as such. If you want to take it personally, you will. All I can do is be genuinely nice and a good guy. I don't really see how negotiating contradicts being nice and good, and further I think its impractical to ask people not to ask you an innocent question (can we do $x.00 instead of $y.00?) because that question might offend you under certain circumstances.
Also note: I'm being a bit of a devil's advocate. I don't negotiate hourly rates, mostly because you ladies have spoken, and I won't do it out respect for the overwhelming majority of you that don't want me to. But make no mistake, that means I'm not giving people my business that I wanted to, but so be it. I'm just trying to say I understand those that find negotiation beneficial. I just don't see what the harm is in an innocent discussion. I guess it just goes back to philosophy, and we're apparently at different ends. Originally Posted by sketchball82
The thing is, this is a two way road. Consider for a moment with me, the feelings gentlemen have on "upcharges" By your own statement you could either hold a hypocritical stance and say no she should not upcharge but it is okay for the gentleman to negotiate. OR it is impolite of the lady to not already have a firm statement of what she wanted for the date in advance.I don't think practice of upcharges as the term is often used is a good analogy for the practice of negotiation.
If it is alright for the gentleman to negotiate than it should be perfectly acceptable to upcharge. After all if he does not wish to spend the extra he can simply offer a polite no thank you.
I don't upcharge myself. I prefer to ignore the business part of our arrangement as much as possible. It allows for a more passionate and spontaneous date for me.
My return devils argument and question is simply.... If you feel it is right to negotiate do you feel it is appropriate for a lady to upcharge? Originally Posted by JayceeRivers
In many markets goods and services, negotiating is perfectly acceptable. In very few markets are upcharges viewed as a positive. No consumer or buyer likes surprises. Originally Posted by atlcomedyI think there is acceptable and unacceptable upcharging. First, what I find unacceptable is advertising that you are GFE and charging extra for the things that are part of a gfe experience (DFK and BBBJ).
The thing is, this is a two way road. Consider for a moment with me, the feelings gentlemen have on "upcharges" By your own statement you could either hold a hypocritical stance and say no she should not upcharge but it is okay for the gentleman to negotiate. OR it is impolite of the lady to not already have a firm statement of what she wanted for the date in advance.It depends on what you mean by upcharge.
If it is alright for the gentleman to negotiate than it should be perfectly acceptable to upcharge. After all if he does not wish to spend the extra he can simply offer a polite no thank you.
I don't upcharge myself. I prefer to ignore the business part of our arrangement as much as possible. It allows for a more passionate and spontaneous date for me.
My return devils argument and question is simply.... If you feel it is right to negotiate do you feel it is appropriate for a lady to upcharge? Originally Posted by JayceeRivers
It depends on what you mean by upcharge.Well played my friend. You have my respect.
If you mean advertise $150, set the appointment, and then tell your client you'll only see them for $300 during the second call, then yeah not ok.
If if you mean attempting to re-negotiate by spicing up your end of the deal? I'm fine with that. Hell.. if we settled on a price but as we started fucking the provider said, "You know what. I really want the $300 or better yet $350. How about I give you Greek and instead of doing $250, we do $350?"... then I would probably say sounds great. I have no problem with a lady itemizing her services so long as she's clear about what she's offering.
If we negotiate a rate for GFE, I'm going to be pretty pissed if the provider actually gives me a cold experience and then says I'll DFK you for another $30. That's because there was some inherent dishonesty, and I would feel mislead.
It may be the lawyer in me, but I'm okay with renegotiating if both parties agree. It's not okay to just renege on your part of the deal because after one party performs you think you deserve more or intentionally mislead the other party though.
I don't see any hypocrisy in this at all though. Originally Posted by sketchball82