Travel question for all

If I were a woman, I would fake an orgasm during the pat down

Can't remember where I heard an Israeli equivalent of a TSA honcho saying that they check EVERYONE. The reporter queried about profiling, experience of the inspectors and extra time for the travelers he said that the inspectors are highly trained and if a test reveals they don't catch a fake bomb they fire the guy immediately. Said it only takes 30 minutes for a person to get out of the car and onto the plane. Rely mostly on intelligence if a passenger is just that or something else. Can't argue with the results since it has benn 8+ years since a breech in security.

The Israeli model for security in air travel is second to none. All could learn a lot from them.

lol whooa chill out there big boy!
theres been a few mods having different stances on certain topics
soo, i am actually still puzzled if its allowed
why? bc there are well known sa provider(s) with these pix in her showcase(s)
so i thought you were promoting the idea
Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti

Allowed? No. We do our best to keep such pictures from appearing here but it is a difficult task and the staff does the best it can.

For the record...

I love pictures. But most of those pictures that defy the rules here are just not attractive to me.

That was on Foxxy News today and the gentleman is a retired Director of their equivalent to our TSA. All emplyees have at least a Bachelor's Degree, are trilingual and well-versed in customer relations. It works so well the gentlman scoffed at comments given before a Senate panel this week by our TSA Director that they are increasing classes pertaining to anger management for the Thanksgiving Holiday travel season.

Apparently theres some question as to whether or not the new scanners are safe due to the amount of radiation they subject you to. Not so much for most people, but for small children, pregnant women, and people that fly a lot (i.e. the pilots). I havent looks up what the specs are on the scanners so I dont know for sure that theres a real reason to worry, but in the lawsuit a couple pilots are bringing against TSA they claim its higher than the X-rays the doctors use which if its true would definantly not be good for repeat exposure esp for kids.

I think providers should charge for that pat down Originally Posted by FootLong

I'd pay!

If I were a woman, I would fake an orgasm during the pat down Originally Posted by Marcus78

I think this is my fav answer on here! Thanks guys

I agree with WM...I travel a ton on an airplane too...pat all 6 and a half feet of me down if you must! Would rather go through that than having to take a nose dive at 30,000 feet!

We're provider's for goodness sake...how bad could it be? (lol) Originally Posted by Likinikki

ha ha ha... that was my first thought as well...

Allowed? No. We do our best to keep such pictures from appearing here but it is a difficult task and the staff does the best it can. Originally Posted by Mokoa

well, i have to disagree on that one. anywho..this thread isnt about that
**new pix cumming soon guys**

If I were a woman, I would fake an orgasm during the pat down Originally Posted by Marcus78

i think thats hilarious!! ill tell yall about the reaction tomorrow!!

i wasnt "frisked"
i honestly didnt see anyone being patted down

If I were a woman, I would fake an orgasm during the pat down Originally Posted by Marcus78

I don't see what being a woman has to do with it. My experience and observation is that it is a lot easier to cause a male orgasm, so perhaps you could "fake" one during the pat down. (wink, wink)

I agree with WM...I travel a ton on an airplane too...pat all 6 and a half feet of me down if you must! Would rather go through that than having to take a nose dive at 30,000 feet! Originally Posted by tim_29m

I forgot to say "bingo".

At this point all that excitment over civil disobedience to clog the system seems to have evaporated. Another internet tempest blown up by news reports. And very few travelers in any report I saw expressed frustration or dismay over what they encountered with the screening.

I do think the jury is still out on the radiation exposure issue, as I have heard some people with appropriate scientific credentials express a measure of concern. Me, I'm now focused on other forms of personal exposure. Heh, heh.

As a frequent traveler, I know what to bring in my carry on, I know what to expect at the security check point, and I appreciate that they try to make traveling safe.

It may be annoying to some, but sooner or later their will be another 911, and the security procedures are better now than before.

Radiation from scanners? Sure, but you are also exposed when you are at 30000 feet.