I'll not vote in the poll because it's either ambiguous or an inappropriate (in my opinion) standard. But if you want to assess or evaluate my attitude:
Except in extreme circumstances, I will strive to recognize everyone's autonomy and dignity as a human being, and realize that this implies a minimum standard of how I interact with them. For example, I will strive to remember that I do not have the right to impose my values on them, merely the decision whether to interact with them if our values differ.
I will always have opinions about various aspects of a person (intelligence, character, ability to express themselves clearly, personality, etc.), in addition to an overall opinion of the person. There will be escorts of whom I have a negative opinion (in whole or in part) and clients of whom I have a negative opinion (in whole or in part). There will be clients of whom I have a positive opinion and escorts of whom I have a positive opinion. (I'm a curmudgeon, so the negative opinions will vastly outnumber the positive opinions. Deal with it.) I will try to base those opinions on observations rather than assumptions.
I will try to remember that in some instances, negative opinions represent a difference in values rather than a moral failing by that person. I will try to remember that expressing a negative opinion: (a) is best done by focusing on behavior rather than making it personal; (b) can be done calmly and tactfully; and (c) need not be expressed publicly at all if doing so would inflame passions or hurt feelings without serving any positive purpose. I will try to remember, in the context of negative opinions of others, that I am far from perfect myself and temper my disapproval of others with that knowledge.
I will try not to base my opinion of a person on their race, age, religion, politics, or any of a number of other irrelevant (for purposes of "respect" characteristics -- including gender and their participation in P4P, whether as an escort or a client. Note that this also implies that I will try not to apply different standards -- including condescension (or "soft bigotry of low expectations") toward the ladies by "forgiving" behavior by them that I would not "forgive" by another. (That applies not only to behavior but also capabilities.) I will try to be an "equal opportunity" curmudgeon; for example, considering comments foolish/inarticulate or insightful based on the comment rather than the gender or profession of the person who made them.
In all of the above, I will try but often fail miserably. But I
will try.
I don't know if there's
anyone whom I "respect" in all circumstances. Ladies who want unquestioning acceptance won't receive it from me, and neither will clients. Many (whether the ladies or the clients) may consider me an overly stern, pain in the ass, unforgiving, elitist, unpleasant curmudgeon. And they're probably right. Perhaps I should consider myself a "No" vote?