Don't sell yourself short on the douchebag thing.Why not?Originally Posted by Paulwantsya
You already did!
Are you going to answer this?If I don't say anything... You can't prove my mistake. How about you go try and low ball some whores, instead of try and prove more invalid points here, will probably be much more lucrative for your wrinkly old ass.
You do know that you made a pretty big mistake in post 13 ... right? Originally Posted by Paulwantsya
If I don't say anything... You can't prove my mistake. How about you go try and low ball some whores, instead of try and prove more invalid points here, will probably be much more lucrative for your wrinkly old ass. Originally Posted by AccidentalHobbyistYup... the oweness (lol) was on you... and you failed again....
If you only knew how wrong "you" are. Lmao. Why do you guys think you know everything?? Lmao.Mine is not speculation. I know for a fact who he was. But if you think just for your satisfaction I am going to lay out all the facts on this board you are out of your fucking mind. And personally I don't give a shit if you believe it or not. Just hate the fucking politicized justice system we must live in today.
We can only speculate. As can you. Originally Posted by AccidentalHobbyist
Well if what you say is true then she didn't have much of a defense lawyer or a case because the judge was convinced that he was a John.And you should get the facts before you decide to post and contradict someone. You did not ever bother to find out that there was no jury trial. Our justice system today discourages jury trials. The push to get their kind of justice. If you paid any attention to the posts I make you will find I never speculate.
How do you know the DA didn't care to find the truth? I hate it when people post crap like that. I assume it was a jury trial and if it was did the jury not care about the evidence either?
The internet is overflowing with people who just totally ignore the results of months of investigation and evidence before a jury and just stat what they think happened as a fact. Originally Posted by brianjackson
The news is wrong. I know for a fact he was not a client. She acted in self defense basically got tired of being abused. But who is going to believe. DA wouldn't have cared in this case which one was guilty. Just an easy conviction. He was not a client. Kind of like in Ferguson. But he was a good boy. Originally Posted by FlyboyNY
Mine is not speculation. I know for a fact who he was. But if you think just for your satisfaction I am going to lay out all the facts on this board you are out of your fucking mind. And personally I don't give a shit if you believe it or not. Just hate the fucking politicized justice system we must live in today. Originally Posted by FlyboyNYI am unclear; she was acting in self-defense but he was a good boy. Should she have gotten more time or less in your opinion?
Less time for sure. The good boy comment was sarcasm. Likened it to the media saying the guy that got shot in ferguson was a good boy even though they had video of him being a thug.
And nothing pisses me off more than a fucktard coming on here saying "if only you knew how wrong you are" implying that I made that up for some reason and posted it only to say he was speculating. If your going to call me out you better have your fucking facts straight. People can shove their opinions up there ass. Originally Posted by FlyboyNY
Less time for sure. The good boy comment was sarcasm. Likened it to the media saying the guy that got shot in ferguson was a good boy even though they had video of him being a thug.
And nothing pisses me off more than a fucktard coming on here saying "if only you knew how wrong you are" implying that I made that up for some reason and posted it only to say he was speculating. If your going to call me out you better have your fucking facts straight. People can shove their opinions up there ass. Originally Posted by FlyboyNY
Originally Posted by offshoredrilling
Well if what you say is true then she didn't have much of a defense lawyer or a case because the judge was convinced that he was a John.I hear what you're saying. But often times, "months of investigation" is nothing more than window-dressing with much of that time spent actually doing nothing. The state and its legal arms are no stranger to apathetic behavior and a general lack of effort, which leads them to often make wrong decisions because it's easier to do that than to investigate deeper and find the truth.
How do you know the DA didn't care to find the truth? I hate it when people post crap like that. I assume it was a jury trial and if it was did the jury not care about the evidence either?
The internet is overflowing with people who just totally ignore the results of months of investigation and evidence before a jury and just stat what they think happened as a fact. Originally Posted by brianjackson