Why don't you link the article you pulled this from, you copy and pasting cocksucker? Because it's an opinion piece and not news? Perhaps. Here's the link, from the WSJ, that bastion of cocksuckery at its finest. What it fails to point out is that no one is going to get Iran to concede all those points. Abraham Lincoln couldn't get Iran to concede on those points. When you are the side who wants something to change, charging in and demanding things is not the way to get them. Iran would be happy with the status quo. We are the ones who want change. We must incentivize those changes or otherwise why would they concede to anything?
http://www.wsj.com/articles/iran-dip...ers-1435272447 Originally Posted by WombRaider
Once again you showcase your astonishing ignorance! We're holding over $100 billion in Iranian assets which they are desperate to get their hands on. THEY are the ones who want change - in the form of a lifting of all economic and financial sanctions. Like Odumbo, you are a capitulationist who is too fucking stupid to know how to play a strong hand.
If the Iranians are not going to concede on the minimum required by seasoned Democratic foreign policy hands and Obama's own trusted advisors, then the handwriting is on the wall - it's time to WALK AWAY!!! For our national security AND Obama's legacy. You're too much of a sycophantic lemming to admit what is obvious to everyone.
.