Would you vote for Trump today?

Fuck no. Racist oligarch.

Hillary, Jeb, Rubio, Sanders, O'Malley, Walker, et. al. They will all pull the handle. The only one who might hesitate first is Rand Paul, but he will likely pull it, too.

Were you ever "dumb enough to vote for BO?" Originally Posted by bigtex

I made a mistake by voting for BO the first time. I have apologized to everyone for doing that. I didn't do it again. It would have been dumb to have voted for him the second time.

Fuck...Lets face it. Any dipshit could do the job.

I'll vote for bt.

Bigtex/Gator42
2016

Depends on who he is running against. Trump has the msm stumbling and sputtering over themselves and they are having to resort to the same thing the diehard libs are doing here, lying. And it is lying. No matter how much you want to pretend that illegal aliens aren't smuggling drugs, raping, and murdering Americans, they are.

And I must admit it's just a bonus to watch the PC police absolutely freaking out and not knowing what to do with someone that stands up to them. He makes the other candidates look very weak in his shadow.

I'd vote for Ron White.

I would vote for Tater, also.

While I don't believe The Donald has a snowball's chance in hell of winning the 2016 Republican nomination, I believe the potential is there for him to be a huge distraction for the eventual Republican nominee.

Trump's massive ego and fat bank account are custom made for him to make an Independent run for the Presidency in 2016. Some people would probably compare his situation to Ross Perot in 1992 but I believe Trump would be much more similar to the Ralph Nader effect in 2000.

Of the Nader votes who would have voted in 2000, most would have voted for Al Gore had Nader not been on the ballot. There would have been some who would not have voted at all! In any event, very few, if any, Nader voters would have voted for Bush in 2000.

On the other hand, a greater percentage of Perot's votes would have gone to G.H.W. Bush in 1992 but a fairly significant portion of Perot votes (probably in the 35 - 40% range) would have gone to Clinton. By no means would it have been enough to turn the fairly decisive 1992 Clinton election to G.H.W. Bush.

That certainly would have not been the case as it relates to the Nader factor in Bush v Gore, where the final vote tally was razor thin.

I hope Donald at least gets enough traction during the Republican Primary to spoon-feed his massive ego.

I say let Trump run as a 2016 Indy and let the votes fall where they may in November.

Not now, not ever.

TATER 2016!!!

TATER 2016!!! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Is this the incisive and relevant fact-based post you're wishing I would make...

TATER 2016!!! Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Dull knife, must not have watched Ron White.

Bigtex/Gator42
2016 Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Excellent choice, Lama!

That's what I call a balanced ticket!

EAT 'EM UP!

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

womby would LOOOOVE to be the HMIC ( head mexican't in charge) of Presidential blowjobs ! He and shammy would tagteam the Pres's cock or offer "round-the-clock" "coverage" of THAT penis !!!Guess his chance at his "dream job" (blow job, more like ! ) is out the window if Shrillary gets anointed our next occupier of 1600 Pennsylvania avenue. But Shrillary could always break out her strapon for such a faithful gruberized minion as woomby !!