Message for provider's with the no black guy's rule

Of course you are at risk and of course you should practice safe sex. But when the stats say 1 out of 3 black males between a certain age group in Baton Rouge has HIV, someone may feel safer not taking that extra risk. If you cannot see this, then you my friend are just trying to stir up a race debate while refusing to accept a legitimate argument against your stance. Obviously, plenty of ladies agree with you and feel that they are safe enough, and others disagree and feel they are not safe. Again, it comes down to a providers personal choice. I was simply telling you one reason why a lady may have the no AA policy and you won't accept it. So what is the argument now?

Would you feel more comfortable driving down a road that has 1 death evey year, or down a road that has multiple deaths a year, even if you are wearing your seatbelt? It doesn't mean you are safe either way, but one road is statistically less risky. All I'm trying to do is tell you this is why some providers may have their policy.

I see anyone as long as you are respectful and mature

See that is where things get twisted you do not get to tell me anything suggest ,recommend advise,possibly and I would not travel either road if it was an increase chance of death the smart thing would be to find another way to get to my destination.

This took a possible turn for the worse rather quickly. Originally Posted by Nicolet

He asked for it.

He is pulling a left wing tactic..... in the words of james carville "Never let a crisis go to waste."

Here is some data to support the fact that he is just flat wrong.

The report "The Color of Crime"

The report The Color of Crime (2005, second expanded edition) by the New Century Foundation states that while the official crime statistics show large racial differences in the United States, there are several problems which tend to cause underestimation of the racial differences. One example being "Whites" sometimes including Hispanics. Another is not adjusting for that the different racial groups differ in population size. The report reviews the more accurate statistics that is available and describes many large differences in crime rates between races. The report also examines the research on possible bias against racial minorities in the justice system and the police and concludes that bias not a significant explanation for the different racial crime rates.[3]

It major findings were stated as:[3]

+ Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.

+ When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

+ Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the White rate.

+ The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black and Hispanic.

+ Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving Blacks and Whites, Blacks commit 85 percent and Whites commit 15 percent.

+ Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are Black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When Whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are Black.

+ Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a White than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

+ Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

+ Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

+ Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

+ Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

+ Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than Whites. Hispanics are three times more likely.

1. The one thing I like about post like this is that it lets you see what guys here have the racial issues. That's always good info.

2. HIV rates in LA are elevated for everyone because the prison population is factored in in this state. Not so in others. Also, HIV doesn't care what race you are. In addition, I don't think ANY of the ladies are just going to go "You're white so it's ok to bareback me!"

3. Providers who don't see AA:

a. Have had bad experiences with AA and unfortunately have generalized all AA men. My question would be that I'm sure they've had bad experiences with other races also so that goes back to some personal issue. That's fine, I don't want to give my hard earned money to someone like that anyway.

b. Lazy in screening. I personally have 15 OKAYS on p411 and a pretty good rep with some of the most reputable providers that frequent this board. If they won't see me they probably didn't do enough screening which makes me question their level of professionalism.

c. The fact is some supposedly NBA providers DO see AA men but request that you don't do reviews on them because it is known that some of you racist assholes here threaten them with not seeing them anymore if they do because of your own racial issues. They do it to protect their income. If you're interested in seeing a provider who advertises as NBA, simply write a polite PM and ask. They'll let you know one way or another. If you see one, don't do a review unless she says it's ok

He asked for it.

He is pulling a left wing tactic..... in the words of james carville "Never let a crisis go to waste."

Here is some data to support the fact that he is just flat wrong.

The report "The Color of Crime"

The report The Color of Crime (2005, second expanded edition) by the New Century Foundation states that while the official crime statistics show large racial differences in the United States, there are several problems which tend to cause underestimation of the racial differences. One example being "Whites" sometimes including Hispanics. Another is not adjusting for that the different racial groups differ in population size. The report reviews the more accurate statistics that is available and describes many large differences in crime rates between races. The report also examines the research on possible bias against racial minorities in the justice system and the police and concludes that bias not a significant explanation for the different racial crime rates.[3]

It major findings were stated as:[3]

+ Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.

+ When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

+ Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the White rate.

+ The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black and Hispanic.

+ Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving Blacks and Whites, Blacks commit 85 percent and Whites commit 15 percent.

+ Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are Black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When Whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are Black.

+ Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a White than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

+ Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

+ Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

+ Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

+ Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

+ Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than Whites. Hispanics are three times more likely. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

You are pulling the Fox new bullshit,what is the difference?

None of this really matters anyway. If a provider chooses, for whatever reason, not to do business with you, there are plenty of more providers, as this thread has proved, who are willing to do business with you. So why would you want to give your business to someone who doesn't want your business? And there's no reason to make an issue over it as you do indeed have other women who want your business and you are still able to participate in the hobby.

The point of the original message of this thread was to prove a point by giving a sort of middle finger to those providers who don't want your business because you felt unjustly judged and you used a tragedy to do so. But since then, others have tried to give their opinions on the reasoning behind the choices of ladies. And that was just that, the ladies' choices, we don't even know why. But a logical debate did not follow those opinions by the original author.

In other words, if she don't want you, move on to the next one, it's her loss. And don't use a tragedy to argue a point.

He asked for it.

He is pulling a left wing tactic..... in the words of james carville "Never let a crisis go to waste."

Here is some data to support the fact that he is just flat wrong.

The report "The Color of Crime"

The report The Color of Crime (2005, second expanded edition) by the New Century Foundation states that while the official crime statistics show large racial differences in the United States, there are several problems which tend to cause underestimation of the racial differences. One example being "Whites" sometimes including Hispanics. Another is not adjusting for that the different racial groups differ in population size. The report reviews the more accurate statistics that is available and describes many large differences in crime rates between races. The report also examines the research on possible bias against racial minorities in the justice system and the police and concludes that bias not a significant explanation for the different racial crime rates.[3]

It major findings were stated as:[3]

+ Blacks are seven times more likely than people of other races to commit murder, and eight times more likely to commit robbery.

+ When Blacks commit crimes of violence, they are nearly three times more likely than non-Blacks to use a gun, and more than twice as likely to use a knife.

+ Hispanics commit violent crimes at roughly three times the white rate, and Asians commit violent crimes at about one quarter the White rate.

+ The single best indicator of violent crime levels in an area is the percentage of the population that is Black and Hispanic.

+ Of the nearly 770,000 violent interracial crimes committed every year involving Blacks and Whites, Blacks commit 85 percent and Whites commit 15 percent.

+ Blacks commit more violent crime against whites than against blacks. Forty-five percent of their victims are white, 43 percent are Black, and 10 percent are Hispanic. When Whites commit violent crime, only three percent of their victims are Black.

+ Blacks are an estimated 39 times more likely to commit a violent crime against a White than vice versa, and 136 times more likely to commit robbery.

+ Blacks are 2.25 times more likely to commit officially-designated hate crimes against whites than vice versa.

+ Only 10 percent of youth gang members are white.

+ Hispanics are 19 times more likely than whites to be members of youth gangs. Blacks are 15 times more likely, and Asians are nine times more likely.

+ Between 1980 and 2003 the US incarceration rate more than tripled, from 139 to 482 per 100,000, and the number of prisoners increased from 320,000 to 1.39 million.

+ Blacks are seven times more likely to be in prison than Whites. Hispanics are three times more likely. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Globespotter, I make a living out of eating pussboys like you for lunch... I would literally dissect, destroy and obliterate each and every line item you typed with facts. The beauty of data (I'm a banker/accountant) and my God I LOVE DATA, is I can find some document or study to counter the gibberish you just pulled off of the fox news website. BUT, my friend or to pay homage to my spanish people, but for you amigo, I'm going to give you a pass and not embarrass you. I will not show you that THIS Black/African American/Negro/Nigger (Oh, highly educated and financially set NEGRO) can go round for round, debate for debate and tit for tat with you. Actually won two debate awards in college.. Hmm.. imagine that a nigger that knows how to debate.. Not the barbershop debate either my friend.. Anyhoot, you get a pass, I'm turning over a new leaf on social media. The leaf of "it's all a joke", so laugh it off. Goodnight buddy and I'm praying for you tonight.. Be blessed

To the OP, I've learned to keep it moving. Don't worry about who will or will not see you. If there is a White/Black/Native American/Asian/European/Hispanic provider who refuses to see me due to my skin then I believe it's her loss. If she would rather go down on a fat, stinky, hairy, ugly, disgusting, can't get hard/need a penis pump, gross guy, did I say stink beyond comprehension, just because he is white, THEN... Haha.. Then man, I wouldn't want HER mouth anywhere near me anyway... I'm no supermodel, but hot damn I'm not stinky, hairy, gross and disgusting.. So, to sum it up OP, see who wants to see you. Put on your thousand dollar suit, your three thousand dollar watch, your five hundred dollar belt, your five hundred dollar shoes and your two hundred and fifty dollar bottle of bond #9 and go see that lady who wants to see you bro.. Take care man.

The Reasons Why So Many Black People Are in Prison Go Well Beyond Profiling

Posted: 06/23/2011 4:56 pm EDT Updated: 08/23/2011 5:12 am EDT When we think of racial profiling, we generally think of a person of color, perhaps a Black or Latino man or woman, in a car who gets stopped by police based on skin color. Often, a minor traffic infraction, like failing to signal when changing lanes, provides the legal rationale for such stops, when in reality the stops are motivated by race.

Most Americans get why this is wrong. But the role that race plays in the criminal justice system goes far beyond this type of profiling.
On Sunday, the Washington Post featured an essay by two experts, Marc Mauer, executive director of The Sentencing Project, and David Cole, a Georgetown law professor, who in "Five Myths about Americans in Prison" examined the role of race in incarceration.
These men show that not only are people of color stopped more frequently by police, their communities, particularly with anti-drug efforts, receive far more attention from police. And black men are often charged and prosecuted differently than their White counterparts.
Mauer and Cole attempt to dispel the myth that there is a disproportionate number of Black people in prison because Black people commit more crimes.
They point out that although Whites and African Americans use and sell drugs at about the same rates, Black men in 2003 were almost 12 times as likely to go to prison as White men. Although Black people are 12 percent of the population and 14 percent of drug users, according to Mauer and Cole, they comprise 34 percent of those arrested for drug offenses and 45 percent of those incarcerated in state prisons for such offenses.
Both men attribute disparities in incarceration rates in part to the way urban Black communities are policed.
"Police find drugs where they look for them," they wrote. "Inner-city, open-air drug markets are easier to bust than those that operate out of suburban basements. And numerous studies show that minorities are stopped by police more often than Whites."
To understand the over-incarceration of black people, one must take a good hard look at all the ways black communities are policed. When I worked as a crime reporter for a daily newspaper in Newport News, Va., it was immediately obvious to me that the city's East End -- a low-income Black urban community -- was over-policed. Whenever I drove into the East End, it seemed that I couldn't drive more than a couple of blocks without encountering a police car. I could drive miles in another part of the city without running into an officer.
Once on a police ride-a-long, the officer I rode with pulled over a Black woman who had stopped along the double-yellow line to let her grandson out to attend an afterschool program.
The officer, a White male, slammed on the brakes, hopped out and asked for her drivers' license. When she complied, he ran the license through a crime database to see if she had any outstanding warrants.
When I asked the officer why he stopped the woman, he said that it was illegal to stop in the middle of the street to let someone out. I can't imagine that in one of the wealthier and Whiter areas of the city that an older White woman would be stopped and detained under similar circumstances.
The saturation of police in the East End helped me gain a better understanding of how low-income urban Black communities are policed.
To focus law enforcement efforts on one or two racial groups while limiting scrutiny and arrests of another is theoretically illegal -- a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and the Fifth Amendment's protection from abuse by government authority. But subjecting communities of color to differential treatment goes on every day despite those constitutional protections.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the New York Police Department's latest data from the first quarter of 2011 shows police still stop and frisk African Americans at far higher rates than they do Whites with their odious stop-and-frisk law. Some 50.6 percent of the 183,326 who were frisked were Black in the first three months of the year, although African Americans comprise just 23 percent of the city's population. Ironically, Whites are more likely to be found with illegal drugs or weapons than Blacks or Latinos.
Profiling is the starting place for this disparate treatment. Blacks and Latinos are also more likely to be charged, tried and convicted than their White counterparts for the same offenses. And money is perhaps the crucial factor in determining whether you get adequate legal help.
As a starting place to deal with this bias, the Rights Working Group is calling for passage of the End Racial Profiling Act and recommending that the Department of Justice Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies be made enforceable. Try again my friend is that the best you have!!!!!!

The Reasons Why So Many Black People Are in Prison Go Well Beyond Profiling

Posted: 06/23/2011 4:56 pm EDT Updated: 08/23/2011 5:12 am EDT When we think of racial profiling, we generally think of a person of color, perhaps a Black or Latino man or woman, in a car who gets stopped by police based on skin color. Often, a minor traffic infraction, like failing to signal when changing lanes, provides the legal rationale for such stops, when in reality the stops are motivated by race.

Most Americans get why this is wrong. But the role that race plays in the criminal justice system goes far beyond this type of profiling.
On Sunday, the Washington Post featured an essay by two experts, Marc Mauer, executive director of The Sentencing Project, and David Cole, a Georgetown law professor, who in "Five Myths about Americans in Prison" examined the role of race in incarceration.
These men show that not only are people of color stopped more frequently by police, their communities, particularly with anti-drug efforts, receive far more attention from police. And black men are often charged and prosecuted differently than their White counterparts.
Mauer and Cole attempt to dispel the myth that there is a disproportionate number of Black people in prison because Black people commit more crimes.
They point out that although Whites and African Americans use and sell drugs at about the same rates, Black men in 2003 were almost 12 times as likely to go to prison as White men. Although Black people are 12 percent of the population and 14 percent of drug users, according to Mauer and Cole, they comprise 34 percent of those arrested for drug offenses and 45 percent of those incarcerated in state prisons for such offenses.
Both men attribute disparities in incarceration rates in part to the way urban Black communities are policed.
"Police find drugs where they look for them," they wrote. "Inner-city, open-air drug markets are easier to bust than those that operate out of suburban basements. And numerous studies show that minorities are stopped by police more often than Whites."
To understand the over-incarceration of black people, one must take a good hard look at all the ways black communities are policed. When I worked as a crime reporter for a daily newspaper in Newport News, Va., it was immediately obvious to me that the city's East End -- a low-income Black urban community -- was over-policed. Whenever I drove into the East End, it seemed that I couldn't drive more than a couple of blocks without encountering a police car. I could drive miles in another part of the city without running into an officer.
Once on a police ride-a-long, the officer I rode with pulled over a Black woman who had stopped along the double-yellow line to let her grandson out to attend an afterschool program.
The officer, a White male, slammed on the brakes, hopped out and asked for her drivers' license. When she complied, he ran the license through a crime database to see if she had any outstanding warrants.
When I asked the officer why he stopped the woman, he said that it was illegal to stop in the middle of the street to let someone out. I can't imagine that in one of the wealthier and Whiter areas of the city that an older White woman would be stopped and detained under similar circumstances.
The saturation of police in the East End helped me gain a better understanding of how low-income urban Black communities are policed.
To focus law enforcement efforts on one or two racial groups while limiting scrutiny and arrests of another is theoretically illegal -- a violation of the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and the Fifth Amendment's protection from abuse by government authority. But subjecting communities of color to differential treatment goes on every day despite those constitutional protections.
According to the Wall Street Journal, the New York Police Department's latest data from the first quarter of 2011 shows police still stop and frisk African Americans at far higher rates than they do Whites with their odious stop-and-frisk law. Some 50.6 percent of the 183,326 who were frisked were Black in the first three months of the year, although African Americans comprise just 23 percent of the city's population. Ironically, Whites are more likely to be found with illegal drugs or weapons than Blacks or Latinos.
Profiling is the starting place for this disparate treatment. Blacks and Latinos are also more likely to be charged, tried and convicted than their White counterparts for the same offenses. And money is perhaps the crucial factor in determining whether you get adequate legal help.
As a starting place to deal with this bias, the Rights Working Group is calling for passage of the End Racial Profiling Act and recommending that the Department of Justice Guidance Regarding the Use of Race by Federal Law Enforcement Agencies be made enforceable. Try again my friend is that the best you have!!!!!! Originally Posted by Infinityg37

Ignore him man. Don't lose sleep or waste any of your brain cells over him/some of them.

This is insane , everybody is so stressed about the white providers with a no A.A policy. When half the hobbyists have a silent no A.A. policy as well . It's both ways. True, we all have the right to refuse service to anyone we choose. The providers don't see black clients and whit clients rarely see black providers, especially if they know the provider DOESNT have a no a.a. policy. They console themselves by attempting to convince you that it's their " first time doing this with a black girl". Or they will say they cant review you because the white providers they date will get upset. So only the Lord knows how they probably speak about black providers / clients amongst each other behind closed doors. Truth is, lots of white providers that have no A.A. policy actually have A.A. pimps/managers..... and they have a love/hate relationship with blacks due to issues of infiriority. A black provider might be good enough too give u a bbbj but not good enough for you to review her. A white client will gladly give a white provider 200 for a hh, but publicly embarrass me in a post if i ask for 200 for a hh. A white provider might have a no A.A. policy then give all your money to some dusty black pimp with 7 children. We need to focus less on the race and more on social class. Really that's what it all boils down to.
It is insulting to say blacks have aids like that is the only race that has been attacked by this terrible disease. It's insulting to only focus on the crimes that blacks commit because it is a known fact most serial killers that are captured are white. The incident in Charleston Lafayette and the serial killer NEAL FALLS IS PROOF!
It's more than obvious but many try to ignre that this board has always been racially divided. The reviews the comments the discussions everything are all based on racial entitlement. The clients will put a less than average white provider on a pedastal and buzz about it like she's America's next top Model , and will even give her a more generous donation. Yet there are plenty of black providers that look like models and they will see them and keep it a secret. First off we must be honest with ourselves. All races have levels of social classes. While there are below poverty level blacks there are poor whites as well. You can't just take statistics off below poverty level blacks and compare them to guys like Infinityg37 , or Big papa. If I were them I would tell all of you who did to go fuck yourselves. It's really entertainment for me to watch idiots pretend to be intelligent, and copy and paste data from the internet and act as if they really know anything! Well to do blacks live just like, if not better the well to do whites. If you take the statistics from a poverty strickened guetto of a state that isnt even close to being as wealthy as some of its neighboring states.So say what you want! I say who cares about the opinions of an IGNORANT RACIST REDNECK ,OR THE GIRLS THAT SUCK AND F*$CK THEM? I'M PROUD OF BEING BLACK I'M CONFIDENT THAT I'M NOT A PART OF THE STATISTICS THEY WERE SPEAKING OF AND I'M ELATED THAT I'M EDUCATED ENOUGH TO KNOW BULLSHIT WHEN I SEE OR HEAR IT ! GOOD LUCK TO THE MORONS WITH THIS DISTORTED WAY OF THINKING....

Doesn't bother me at all anymore...

This is insane , everybody is so stressed about the white providers with a no A.A policy. When half the hobbyists have a silent no A.A. policy as well . It's both ways. True, we all have the right to refuse service to anyone we choose. The providers don't see black clients and whit clients rarely see black providers, especially if they know the provider DOESNT have a no a.a. policy. They console themselves by attempting to convince you that it's their " first time doing this with a black girl". Or they will not review you because the white providers they date will get upset. So only the Lord knows how they probably speak about black providers / clients amongst each other behind closed doors. Truth is, lots of white providers that have no A.A. policy actually have A.A. pimps/managers..... and they have a love/hate relationship with blacks due to issues of infiriority. A black provider might be good enough too give u a bbbj but not good enough for you to review her. A white client will gladly give a white provider 200 for a hh, but publicly embarrass me in a post if i ask for 200 for a hh. A white provider might have a no A.A. policy then give all your money to some dusty black pimp with 7 children. We need to focus less on the race and more on social class. Really that's what it all boils down to.
It is insulting to say blacks have aids like that is the only race that has been attacked by this terrible disease. It's insulting to only focus on the crimes that blacks commit because it is a known fact most serial killers that are captured are white. The incident in Charleston Lafayette and the serial killer NEAL FALLS IS PROOF!
It's more than obvious but many try to ignre that this board has always been racially divided. The reviews the comments the discussions everything are all based on racial entitlement. The clients will put a less than average white provider on a pedastal and buzz about it like she's America's next top Model , and will even give her a more generous donation. Yet there are plenty of black providers that look like models and they will see them and keep it a secret. First off we must be honest with ourselves. All races have levels of social classes. While there are below poverty level blacks there are poor whites as well. You can't just take statistics off below poverty level blacks and compare them to guys like Infinityg37 , or Big papa. If I were them I would tell all of you who did to go fuck yourselves. It's really entertainment for me to watch idiots pretend to be intelligent, and copy and paste data from the internet and act as if they really know anything! Well to do blacks live just like, if not better the well to do whites. If you take the statistics from a poverty strickened guetto of a state that isnt even close to being as wealthy as some of its neighboring states.So say what you want! I say who cares about the opinions of an IGNORANT RACIST REDNECK ,OR THE GIRLS THAT SUCK AND F*$CK THEM? I'M PROUD OF BEING BLACK I'M CONFIDENT THAT I'M NOT A PART OF THE STATISTICS THEY WERE SPEAKING OF AND I'M ELATED THAT I'M EDUCATED ENOUGH TO KNOW BULLSHIT WHEN I SEE OR HEAR IT ! GOOD LUCK TO THE MORONS WITH THIS DISTORTED WAY OF THINKING.... Originally Posted by CocoBrown

Lafayette ....

1. The one thing I like about post like this is that it lets you see what guys here have the racial issues. That's always good info.
..... Originally Posted by ilovethemgirls68

Not that I give a shit but if you are pointing at me, you are wrong.

You are pulling the Fox new bullshit,what is the difference? Originally Posted by browntiger

It was from wikipedia; not Fox News.

Globespotter, I make a living out of eating pussboys like you for lunch... I would literally dissect, destroy and obliterate each and every line item you typed with facts.
..... Originally Posted by Bigpapa1

meh

....I will not show you that THIS Black/African American/Negro/Nigger (Oh, highly educated and financially set NEGRO) can go round for round, debate for debate and tit for tat with you. Actually won two debate awards in college.. Hmm.. imagine that a nigger that knows how to debate.. ... Originally Posted by Bigpapa1

College debate team? Do you know Zanzie? He was an NCAA Debate Team Captain.

.....Anyhoot, you get a pass, I'm turning over a new leaf on social media. The leaf of "it's all a joke", so laugh it off. Goodnight buddy and I'm praying for you tonight.. Be blessed
...... Originally Posted by Bigpapa1

No no....let it rip.

Not that I give a shit but if you are pointing at me, you are wrong.
It was from wikipedia; not Fox News.

meh

College debate team? Do you know Zanzie? He was an NCAA Debate Team Captain.

No no....let it rip. Originally Posted by GlobeSpotter

Wikipedia is not a reliable source.Anyone can make a wikipedia page.You give two shits.