How tainted is the pool?

There is a clinic at medical city that that will test for free.

They only have hours twice a week Monday and Thursday.

https://www.healthvana.com/free-std-...x-75230-12364/

I do every 3 months and 6 months with full blood work. This is because cervical cancer run in my family. I love being clean and safe.

There are places one can go to get tested without anyone finding out about it. The county health department will do it. HIV test is only $20. Originally Posted by Biff Biffington

That's good to know.

Will they do it is the question.

The Charlie Sheen fiasco also deals a blow to another theory, that theory being "high dollar" escorts are likely safer to see than lower cost women. I highly doubt Charlie spent much if any money on women charging below 300 dollars an hour. Higher rates doesn't necessarily make a provider safer or cleaner. Originally Posted by Golden Man

Charlie wasn't just banging hookers. He was banging porn stars, transvestites, civilian women, civilian men. We're talking over 1,000 sexual partners, many of whom were in high risk groups, engaging in higher risk activities.

Charlie wasn't just banging hookers. He was banging porn stars, transvestites, civilian women, civilian men. We're talking over 1,000 sexual partners, many of whom were in high risk groups, engaging in higher risk activities. Originally Posted by Fort Worth Punk

A few thoughts
1. A porn star is nothing more than a hooker being paid to fuck while being recorded for others to watch on video.
2. I have noticed based on reviews and post that there are providers and members on this site who hobby with transsexuals
3. It is often implied that some of the ladies are suspected of being under the influence of forbidden topics.
With that said, back to the op's original question how tatinted is the pool. All of crazy behavior Charlie was engaged in is common place in the hobby.

I do every 3 months and 6 months with full blood work. This is because cervical cancer run in my family. I love being clean and safe. Originally Posted by SexyPlatinum

Umm, nevermind.

A few thoughts
1. A porn star is nothing more than a hooker being paid to fuck while being recorded for others to watch on video.
2. I have noticed based on reviews and post that there are providers and members on this site who hobby with transsexuals
3. It is often implied that some of the ladies are suspected of being under the influence of forbidden topics.
With that said, back to the op's original question how tatinted is the pool. All of crazy behavior Charlie was engaged in is common place in the hobby. Originally Posted by Golden Man

Common place? The fact there are a few Transsexual providers and guys who see them does not make it common place. There is a difference between "it happens" and "it's common place". And that is without assuming that all of the acts are unprotected, as they were with Charlie.

Not that many men here see Transsexuals or engage in homosexual sex of any kind and the medical truth is that male on male sexual activity is orders of magnitude more risky than heterosexual sex. Charlie was very active in this area, and his one named, confirmed, Transsexual partner just died of AIDS related illness.

Charlie is hardly representative of the hobby so to take his actions and say they are "common place" in the hobby is like taking what Charlie Manson did and saying it was "common place" in the Hippy Community. These are examples of people on the extreme far end of the bell curve, not people near the middle, and as a result they are the type whose actions tend to garner a lot of attention specifically because they are so unusual, and their impact on the overall pool is minimal.

Common place? The fact there are a few Transsexual providers and guys who see them does not make it common place. There is a difference between "it happens" and "it's common place". And that is without assuming that all of the acts are unprotected, as they were with Charlie.

Not that many men here see Transsexuals or engage in homosexual sex of any kind and the medical truth is that male on male sexual activity is orders of magnitude more risky than heterosexual sex. Charlie was very active in this area, and his one named, confirmed, Transsexual partner just died of AIDS related illness.

Charlie is hardly representative of the hobby so to take his actions and say they are "common place" in the hobby is like taking what Charlie Manson did and saying it was "common place" in the Hippy Community. These are examples of people on the extreme far end of the bell curve, not people near the middle, and as a result they are the type whose actions tend to garner a lot of attention specifically because they are so unusual, and their impact on the overall pool is minimal. Originally Posted by Fort Worth Punk

I think you missed the point on what I am saying. The fact is there is more than one heavily reviewed very popular provider allegedly known for bbfs, who regularly advertises doubles with a transsexuals. Another fact is there are multiple guys who if you look at the reviews are very active with both female providers and also dabble in the ts world. This is how the Charlie Sheen affect taints the pool in the hobby. I say it's common place because when you look at the number of partners they have in the hobby any number of partners those partners have, the risk for coming in contact with one of the higher risk persons directly or indirectly is not that uncommon.

Play safe folks, whether you see providers who are female, male, or TS. Men who are bi-curious is not an uncommon thing, as a matter of fact, it's kinda common. Dunno why some would begrudge an experience, or state it's an unacceptable thing for others to want to experience, as long as ALL parties are of age, agreeable to participation, and everyone is having fun. Why let it offend you or take your stand against it? Most of us like something unusual, different, or not considered the "norm" whether we ever try them or not.

A gent was trying to have a cyber sex type of conversation with me in a chat room once. Apparently he liked his backside paid attention to. No big. What he really wanted was either to annoy me or possibly he wanted graphic details about what I'd like to do or would enjoy doing to his bottom. I simply told him the truth. While it wasn't at the top of my list of things I think of or even desire doing, anyone who wanted that type of play would have to ask. I also told him that it's great if that's what he wanted and I'd happily shove a tree trunk up his bum if it made him happy. (He was dragging the conversation in to cyber sexing, and that's boring to me, so I went to the extreme without all the juicy lead up, so chill. I wasn't being hateful, just skipping a bunch of stuff...LOL) He said he thought that was awesome and I do aim to please. Not a normal response from me, but it got me outta anymore cybersex conversation with him about stuff not at the very top of my list of things I like to do to men. Anyway, they don't just like to do it, they like to talk about it even more it seems. LOL

So if ya do or don't pay or get paid to play...be careful what ya share with others.