Do Strippers make better Providers?

I do still stip... Just in a more intimate one on one setting...
TURN UP THE VOLUME!!!!

I do still stip... Just in a more intimate one on one setting... Originally Posted by Savannah Moon

Yes, she does, and I've seen that first hand, with her as a referee, as an elf, and as a office businesses gal.

Strippers make better providers? NO!

OTOH, I'd love to get a lap dance with Savannah. I worry that ass would make me come in my pants.

Strippers make better providers? NO!

OTOH, I'd love to get a lap dance with Savannah. I worry that ass would make me come in my pants. Originally Posted by KCJoe

You're worried about something that you want to happen, and will happen?

Pure provider v stripper I'll vote 'stripper', but you will see what I mean and it depends upon what you want such that it's really apples to oranges. The 'no shows' are generally either leading you on for more dances or otherwise engaged in manipulation. Some will do it all in house convincing themselves that outside Shangri-la they are somehow different, the same as everyone else. After all, de Nile ain't just a river in Egypt, right. It's not that they made more money or were tired and therefore were not in need so didn't show, so that set probably isn't really relevant to the question here. They made it off of you and never intended to do more than what they did 'in house.'

There are those you get to know, there is no outside the club/other than dance money exchanged and you go out like anyone else. Then there is the dancer who really is mostly a provider. There is the dancer who is actually a stripper who sometimes provides. So the comparison is really the last two and so I would say the stripper provider vs just the stripper category is better, they are technically both strippers, so stripper. How is that for convoluted reasoning?

Where the hell you find strippers aroud here anyway??? Kind of a mute discussion Originally Posted by cmore197474

moot
not mute

And since a mute can't have a discussion. :-)