Harmless females

So they get "Bigkotexed."
or "Woombied."

Take your pick.

Somehow as of 6pm today the Feds have NOT ruled out terrorism.
It STILL may be a possibility!

Moronic buffoons. Originally Posted by gnadfly

They couldn't be woombied, since he's a EUNUCH ! Unless the good Lord REALLY has an option worse than hell for " special cases " ! Wanna hear some women REALLLY bitch ? ! Throw them in with a EUNUCH ! Pobrecita woomby !

Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

Hahaha...........Yes of course, why would I need an assault weapon, lol. Good post

Jim

Reagan (11 mass shootings)
Bush Sr (12 mass shootings)
Clinton (23 mass shootings)
Bush Jr (16 mass shootings)
Obama (162 mass shootings)

Reagan (11 mass shootings)
Bush Sr (12 mass shootings)
Clinton (23 mass shootings)
Bush Jr (16 mass shootings)
Obama (162 mass shootings) Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Based on that, sure looks like there are more mass shootings when lyin liberals are occupying the White House !!! Imagine THAT !! And the libs what Shrillary to continue from there ! But hey, maybe she can make dodging sniper fire an elementary school requirement !

Somehow as of 6pm today the Feds have NOT ruled out terrorism.
It STILL may be a possibility!

Moronic buffoons. Originally Posted by gnadfly

They are waiting for the story to slip to "page 10" .... and Christmas.

The current administration and their sheep are the only ones in doubt.

Someone reported their electronics were "smashed," BTW, not to mention that the motivator may have been the female, who may have had the "training" and "contacts" to assemble the arsenal and bomb materials.

Obaminable has cried the gun control "wolf" too many times. It's falling on deaf ears. Only the "bobbleheads," some of whom are marginalizing and deflecting the reality in this forum. They were wrong, again.

Reagan (11 mass shootings)
Bush Sr (12 mass shootings)
Clinton (23 mass shootings)
Bush Jr (16 mass shootings)
Obama (162 mass shootings) Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Can you source those statistics.

Can you source those statistics. Originally Posted by Stanfeld

A quick look produced the following link with a table embedded in the article that says it is downloadable ...

http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...ones-full-data

in the number of casualties/deaths/injuries ..... The current administration leads .... it looks like through the slaughter at the Christmas Party Obama has about 365 deaths to his credit ... and since everyone likes to blame shit on Bush II it looks like there were about 127 deaths to his credit.

Oh, Obaminable has another year and a couple of months to go! But since the "war on terror is over" and "ISIS is under control," I'm sure that his numbers will level off here shortly. And my use of the word "credit" is SARCASM.

Ban the Democrats.

I wonder if they asked any of them to convert to Islam before they carried out their acts of murder and terrorism. It seems all too possible that death to America means we do not get that opportunity.

So how many refugees does Assup want moving in next door to him.

Me, I got a bunch of refugees living around me, they are called illegal aliens from Mexico and Latin America. Just think if the Muslims had invaded Central America instead of the Spaniards.

So how many refugees does Assup want moving in next door to him. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

One can somewhat extrapolate from the acceptance of "refugees" by Austin at the time of Katrina in comparison to say ..... the Houston metro area. Austinites talk a good game, but the bloviating contributes to "global warming" and that's about it. They're too busy scouting for endangered salamanders!

All your silly schoolyard bullshit aside, what do these statistics show?

They show that now more than ever, we need to reinstate the total ban on assault weapons at a minimum and restrict access to ALL firearms.

What about DEAD AMERICANS don't you NRA worshipping idiots don't you get?

More guns than ever. More hate radio/RWW media than ever. More dead Americans.

Pretty goddamned clear.

Yet you want even more. Yee Haw!

One can somewhat extrapolate from the acceptance of "refugees" by Austin at the time of Katrina in comparison to say ..... the Houston metro area. Austinites talk a good game, but the bloviating contributes to "global warming" and that's about it. They're too busy scouting for endangered salamanders! Originally Posted by LexusLover

That's horseshit, LLephantMan. More than 10,000 of Katrina victims came to Austin, three hours farther away from NOLA than Houston, and a large number stayed here.

I don't know where you get that ridiculous bulkshit, but after all, you are the patriarch of the Idiot Klan , err, KLAN!

Lying sack of shit.

If it's a white guy then it's the shooter.
If it's a Muslim then it's the guns.

If it's a white guy then it's the shooter.
If it's a Muslim then it's the guns. Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

Not at all. It's the fucking GUNS and a society that worships them.

Don't be so glib. It's tasteless as the parade of bodies passes by, assholiness.

Originally Posted by TheDaliLama

I, sort of only, get a kick out of listening to commentators on msnbc, when speaking of the party, stumble and have a slight hesitation over the word holiday before proceeding to mention the "holiday" party.

do you recall the tsarnaev brothers? well of course you do, the boston marathon murderers.

when that happened, commentator after liberal commentator supposed that it was the work of the right wing, as some sort of protest against Obama, and of course it was on tax day, April 15th, what better day for the right wing to kill people

no they couldn't bring themselves to say the truth but they could lie without cause or hesitation

again with farook and mrs farook, the same comment was made on msnbc, that the first thought I had was the right wing

sounds just like wtf and the nut in Colorado

even when its beyond doubt it was radical muslims acting as radical muslims, these fools hold out some alternative possibility

ride the tiger hoping it eats you last because truth is not a liberal value