More stupidity from the democrats president

Typical ignorant j douche post. Once again no clue as to where laws come from. Link showing Obama came up with current rules and regulations or has ability to change them?
Didn't think so.

Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You realize that you said that Mr executive order can't change a law even if it is not a law. You also missed the point ( not surprised), poor old George was backwards when it came to computers. Obama was a master. He should have changed the law.

it's like ekim missing the point......

It's like trusting our government to not put law abiding citizens on a "terrorist watch list"

Do you realize that the local authorities have been instructed to declare any confrontation between citizens as a "threat of terrorism".......

The real shame of all of this is that our government has become so corrupted that it cannot be trusted to do what they are required to do or to not do that which is not allowed.

it's like ekim missing the point......

It's like trusting our government to not put law abiding citizens on a "terrorist watch list"

Do you realize that the local authorities have been instructed to declare any confrontation between citizens as a "threat of terrorism".......

The real shame of all of this is that our government has become so corrupted that it cannot be trusted to do what they are required to do or to not do that which is not allowed. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Avoiding the question? Where do you get unvetted?

You mean a thoroughly "vetted list" like the one Senator Edward "Ted" Kennedy's name was on, suckclown? The Second and Fifth Amendments are still the law in this country, suckclown. So, go have another bowel movement, suckclown, and this time strain out the remains of your brain. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

+ 1 !!!!!! suckclown = woomby wanna-be

Did you ask yourself a question then answer it?

Brilliant! Absolutely brilliant!

Now declare yourself to be a winner!!!

"Munch Master" is perfect for you! Originally Posted by LexusLover

Read much gay boy? It was just a rhetorical question. Because as you would see if you looked later in this thread he doubled down on his non-answer. And he did not provide a link. He seldom does. Since you also know that your brilliance is only a dull glow.

Funny how you asked a question and didn't wait for a response before building your asshole reply based on what you thought the answer would be. And after calling me on the post. Stupid. Absolutely stupid. Now declare you're a loser.
Cock sucking bastard. The perfect name for you.

Typical ignorant j douche post. Once again no clue as to where laws come from. Link showing Obama came up with current rules and regulations or has ability to change them?
Didn't think so.

You realize that you said that Mr executive order can't change a law even if it is not a law. (You should realize I didn't say anything of the sort. Stay off drugs. They're fucking your thinking up.) So it's not a law? You also missed the point ( not surprised), poor old George was backwards when it came to computers. No, I got this point. Obama was a master. He should have changed the law. (but not this one)So it is a law? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So which is it? A law or not? You stated both in your "retort". Too late to backtrack now bud. I didn't argue with your assessment of who knew what about technology. Sounded right to me.

All you did was reiterate was you don't know where the law came from or even if it is a law.
You also didn't show Obama came up with the regulations that anger you so or if he could even change them.

So you make a claim you can't or are unwilling to show a link for. That is the point of my post. Nothing more.
And it was point on and yours is point off.

Our government does not have an adequate vetting process if they miss what is open to the public to see.
How are the "refugees" vetted or are they vetted at all?

I would say that somebody applying for a visa that had for years publicly declared jihad and gets one is an "unvetted" individual.

A ball that falls short of the fence is not a home run.

Read much gay boy? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

You munch much? You still in in 3rd grade, child?

I would say that somebody applying for a visa that had for years publicly declared jihad and gets one is an "unvetted" individual. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Is that similar to someone running for President ...

..... and not producing a copy of his original birth certificate?

So what if her residence address was nonexistent!

Our government does not have an adequate vetting process if they miss what is open to the public to see.
How are the "refugees" vetted or are they vetted at all?

I would say that somebody applying for a visa that had for years publicly declared jihad and gets one is an "unvetted" individual.

A ball that falls short of the fence is not a home run. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Checking fingerprints, criminal record, watch list is just passing them on through?

If that is the minimum and it allowed a terrorist into the country, I would say no, that is not vetting.
This is especially true when there was easy information to be had with minimal effort. Hell I do more than that when checking out potential clients to determine if I think they will be a good fit for my business (just hate them fucking no paying deadbeats).

I will say it is better than what they are doing at our southern border.
Not sure if you get all the criminals from Mexico up in the land of OZ but we get more than our fair share of them here in H-town.

I understand the guilt you must feel in your support of this administration and what they allowed to happen to so many innocent Americans at the hands of an "immigrant" that you feel was adequately vetted. It's not your fault.....entirely. So, don't beat yourself up too bad. I doubt the families of those innocent victims are holding you personally responsible. Now lift your chin up and try to feel better about yourself.

So what does Obama have to do with security and privacy laws? Might want to check the 10 republican judges sitting on the FISA bench. Believe it or not, I'm sure you don't but they're all appointed by the current CJSCOTUS.

I'd bet you'd blame Obama if a toilet backs up in a federal building.

Obama was touted as the most tech savvy president of all times. He understood the Internet and social media more than someone like say....Hillary Clinton. Okay, so why is it that our national security apparatus has rules in place forbidding them from monitoring social media and finding people who swear allegiance to ISIS or Jihad? Seems like a no brainer to me....unless of course you don't really want to find these people.

As for the Nazi Baby Killer, yesterday's news and here is what we do with that;

Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

So what does Obama have to do with security and privacy laws? Might want to check the 10 republican judges sitting on the FISA bench. Believe it or not, I'm sure you don't but they're all appointed by the current CJSCOTUS.

I'd bet you'd blame Obama if a toilet backs up in a federal building. Originally Posted by dumars

I'll bet you'd blame it on Republicans for cutting spending on union plumbers.

If that is the minimum and it allowed a terrorist into the country, I would say no, that is not vetting.
This is especially true when there was easy information to be had with minimal effort. Hell I do more than that when checking out potential clients to determine if I think they will be a good fit for my business (just hate them fucking no paying deadbeats).

I will say it is better than what they are doing at our southern border.
Not sure if you get all the criminals from Mexico up in the land of OZ but we get more than our fair share of them here in H-town.

I understand the guilt you must feel in your support of this administration and what they allowed to happen to so many innocent Americans at the hands of an "immigrant" that you feel was adequately vetted. It's not your fault.....entirely. So, don't beat yourself up too bad. I doubt the families of those innocent victims are holding you personally responsible. Now lift your chin up and try to feel better about yourself. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

Why do you simple fucks think I am feeling guilt? Why do you think I am supporting the administration when I question things you post? The FBI director stated tonight the only thing she posted in her own name was right before they went to the shoot. Finding things on social media after the attack s 20 20 hindsight.

If that is the minimum and it allowed a terrorist into the country, I would say no, that is not vetting.
This is especially true when there was easy information to be had with minimal effort. Hell I do more than that when checking out potential clients to determine if I think they will be a good fit for my business (just hate them fucking no paying deadbeats).

I will say it is better than what they are doing at our southern border.
Not sure if you get all the criminals from Mexico up in the land of OZ but we get more than our fair share of them here in H-town.

I understand the guilt you must feel in your support of this administration and what they allowed to happen to so many innocent Americans at the hands of an "immigrant" that you feel was adequately vetted. It's not your fault.....entirely. So, don't beat yourself up too bad. I doubt the families of those innocent victims are holding you personally responsible. Now lift your chin up and try to feel better about yourself. Originally Posted by The2Dogs

gonna be tough for EKIM to " lift his chin " what with all of the balls he's had resting on it !

So what does ObamTa have to do with security and privacy laws? Might want to check the 10 republican judges sitting on the FISA bench. Believe it or not, I'm sure you don't but they're all appointed by the current CJSCOTUS.

I'd bet you'd blame Obama if a toilet backs up in a federal building. Originally Posted by dumars

Thank you. I couldn't remember the name of the bench that had jurisdiction.
In here, somebody can think their opinion counts as fact, think they heard a cousin say once, or the best is repeating something over and over until opinionated statements become facts (in their minds). These types seldom look at the links we include.
Because it's safer for their egos to just assume we are wrong. Their level of resentment is tied to how many links they check.