Unfortunately, and I kick myself for saying this, WU's right; whatever the motivations are behind E2D's report, Natalia's trouble with him and good intentions defending Evelyn aside, only the provider reviewed can effectively dispute the allegations.
However, sometimes taking the high road and just letting the crap fly under is the wise choice.
Yummy's right too; members here can infer a lot from previous posts and the reputation of all parties.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1730468
Certainly seems to be a lot in question here, but not much available publicly to judge by. So far, I'd say that the subject of the review is leading in fan base. Nobody seems to be buying what E2D's was selling, as opposed to Evelyn's product. For some odd reason, the author did not even put in a specific date, which, as I understand it, disqualifies the review from receiving credit. Not sure from the comments why the provider rated a "No," but evidently that will remain a mystery as it's in ROS. If the reviewer meant to be truly helpful to the many ECCIE Hobbyists without premium access, why didn't he post more detail where everyone could see it?
Going to get some butter, now.