obamacare is coming after your craft beer!

I'll drink to Dixie!!!
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

how about this one

http://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepa...-beer-n2171764

that is going to be a pain for small beer businesss to comply.

Obama is killing innovation daily! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

You mean they don't already know how many calories are in it? That sounds like an oversight in the design phase of the beer. Buyers in the US are more health conscious than in the past. Almost everything has how many calories are in it.

Ingredient A has X calories.
Ingredient B has X calories.
Ingredient C has X calories.

X+X+X= 3X
Old labels are probably grandfathered in.

Now who buys crafted beers? Joe Six Pack? Probably not.
Probably liberals.

$77,000 to redesign the label? Somehow I have trouble believing that.

Do what all business has done. Pass on the cost.

Doesn't Town Hall and the Cato Inst. have any real issues? Couldn't they work on our education problems? I mean other than to say they are all caused by liberals and will fix themselves as soon as a republican is elected president? I mean after trump of course.

Is PBR safe? Originally Posted by JCM800

Probably.
If not, the label tells you how many calories worth of toxins you're consuming

You mean they don't already know how many calories are in it? That sounds like an oversight in the design phase of the beer. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I figured a Pre-Big Chief Tablet would work for you .....

______________________________ __________
--------------------------------------------------------
______________________________ __________



You drink beer in micros often?

Probably.
If not, the label tells you how many calories worth of toxins you're consuming Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

this thread's not going well for you is it munchy? they never do.

toxins? wtf you talking about sport? beer is mainly hops and water. unless you mean polluted water? guess they should have used "pure" artesian spring water like Olympia?

Probably.
If not, the label tells you how many calories worth of toxins you're consuming Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

I'm going to start looking for the Calories of Toxins and my % Toxin DV on labels!

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegu...02.htm#part7-1

if it has a calorie count on the label, you can be pretty sure its "Lite" beer.

Its lite!.
Its Less filling!

if it has a calorie count on the label, you can be pretty sure its "Lite" beer.

Its lite!.
Its Less filling! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I rarely count "calories" .... I look for "toxins" like sugar, fat, and salt.

if it has a calorie count on the label, you can be pretty sure its "Lite" beer.

Its lite!.
Its Less filling! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I said it wrong.

Tastes great!
Less filling.

Its miller lite beer!

tried to post the video, won't play. what am I doing wrong?

So when exactly did alcoholic beverages become classified as food?

So when exactly did alcoholic beverages become classified as food? Originally Posted by chefnerd

when the libtard left got elected, and obammy appointed his pig manwife "food czar" of America

that bitch is stupider than dirt.

Wrong again Kid. They have never been classified as food by law and if you would bother to actually read the text of the law instead of relying on someone else's saying something is so, you might realize that the laws specifically says FOOD, not alcoholic beverages. Still a bad law though.;

Wrong again Kid. They have never been classified as food by law and if you would bother to actually read the text of the law instead of relying on someone else's saying something is so, you might realize that the laws specifically says FOOD, not alcoholic beverages. Still a bad law though.; Originally Posted by chefnerd

and your point was .. what?

I figured a Pre-Big Chief Tablet would work for you .....

______________________________ __________
--------------------------------------------------------
______________________________ __________



You drink beer in micros often? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Nope. I like Bud. Just because you take your shoes off to add 3 numbers doesn't mean everyone does. It good to see you keep a diary..

this thread's not going well for you is it munchy? they never do.

toxins? wtf you talking about sport? beer is mainly hops and water. unless you mean polluted water? guess they should have used "pure" artesian spring water like Olympia?

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Thread is going fine. Yeah, I know what they make beer out of, You failed to refute anything I said. Somebody asked if it was safe. At the time, in my opinion, it was somewhat humorous to add the word toxin. I love it. So desperate to be able to address a post and not be gay rey lite. In the peanut gallery's opinion, tt was the only thing they could go after.

I'm going to start looking for the Calories of Toxins and my % Toxin DV on labels!

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegu...02.htm#part7-1 Originally Posted by LexusLover

You do that. It will help keep you out of trouble

and your point was .. what?

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

There were several points there..
The first was you were wrong.
The second was you were wrong again.

December 2014 was when the final guidelines were released.

Certain beers are considered food by the FDA.

FDA Issues Final Guidance on Labeling of Certain Beers

www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/.../ucm427359.htm

1. Cached
2. Similar

Food and Drug Administration

Loading...



Dec 22, 2014 - Specifically, this refers to beers that are not made from both malted barley and hops but are instead made from substitutes for malted barley (such as sorghum, rice or wheat) or are made without hops. These beers are subject to the food labeling provisions of FDA laws and regulations.


http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegu.../ucm166239.htm

And if you dig around in there you'll find this..

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires packaged foods and dietary supplements to bear nutrition labeling unless they qualify for an exemption (A complete description of the requirements). One exemption, for low-volume products, applies if the person claiming the exemption employs fewer than an average of 100 full-time equivalent employees and fewer than 100,000 units of that product are sold in the United States in a 12-month period. To qualify for this exemption the person must file a notice annually with FDA. Note that low volume products that bear nutrition claims do not qualify for an exemption of this type.

Now get your tablet out Lazy Loser and figure out if any micros qualify.

The third point?
Wrong again Kid. They have never been classified as food by law and if you would bother to actually read the text of the law instead of relying on someone else's saying something is so, you might realize that the laws specifically says FOOD, not alcoholic beverages. Still a bad law though.;

You do that a lot. But you know that.

Another typical whacko cunt thread.

Nope. I like Bud. Just because you take your shoes off to add 3 numbers doesn't mean everyone does. It good to see you keep a diary..


Thread is going fine. Yeah, I know what they make beer out of, You failed to refute anything I said. Somebody asked if it was safe. At the time, in my opinion, it was somewhat humorous to add the word toxin. I love it. So desperate to be able to address a post and not be gay rey lite. In the peanut gallery's opinion, tt was the only thing they could go after.



You do that. It will help keep you out of trouble


There were several points there..
The first was you were wrong.
The second was you were wrong again.

December 2014 was when the final guidelines were released.

Certain beers are considered food by the FDA.

FDA Issues Final Guidance on Labeling of Certain Beers

www.fda.gov/Food/NewsEvents/.../ucm427359.htm

1. Cached
2. Similar

Food and Drug Administration

Loading...



Dec 22, 2014 - Specifically, this refers to beers that are not made from both malted barley and hops but are instead made from substitutes for malted barley (such as sorghum, rice or wheat) or are made without hops. These beers are subject to the food labeling provisions of FDA laws and regulations.


http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegu.../ucm166239.htm

And if you dig around in there you'll find this..

The Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act requires packaged foods and dietary supplements to bear nutrition labeling unless they qualify for an exemption (A complete description of the requirements). One exemption, for low-volume products, applies if the person claiming the exemption employs fewer than an average of 100 full-time equivalent employees and fewer than 100,000 units of that product are sold in the United States in a 12-month period. To qualify for this exemption the person must file a notice annually with FDA. Note that low volume products that bear nutrition claims do not qualify for an exemption of this type.

Now get your tablet out Lazy Loser and figure out if any micros qualify.

The third point?
Wrong again Kid. They have never been classified as food by law and if you would bother to actually read the text of the law instead of relying on someone else's saying something is so, you might realize that the laws specifically says FOOD, not alcoholic beverages. Still a bad law though.;

You do that a lot. But you know that.

Another typical whacko cunt thread. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

typical muchy reply. your superior intellect has blinded me! oh wait .. it was just a smudge on my reading glasses ahahaha