Hillary lies again...About her mother! - Page 2

Then you need someone besides your Trumpy, whffy. he and Hillary are twins. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Quote

I sure see a lot of boasting, puffing up, etc., but nobody has owned up to the fact that JDrunk's OP was bullshit.

Proven bullshit.

Quote

I sure see a lot of boasting, puffing up, etc., but nobody has owned up to the fact that JDrunk's OP was bullshit.

Proven bullshit. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

is it? you vote for this liar. we won't. pig

did you know that according to the HildeWhore, she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary the first mountaineer to successfully climb Mt. Everest and live to prove it? ahahaha

http://www.investors.com/hillary-cli...uma%20confused

a "slight" problem with that ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary

• During her husband’s first term, she said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest. Snopes.com says the story “was almost certainly a bit of fiction invented for political expediency.” In fact, Clinton was born in 1947; Hillary the climber reached Everest’s summit in 1953.

Born Hillary Diane Rodham
October 26, 1947 (age 68)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

hahaha SNICK! let's look at more of the Hildewhore's many lies ..

Election 2016: A top aide to Hillary Clinton told a colleague almost three years ago that the then-secretary of state was “often confused.” Does the nation really want a frequently befuddled president?

Over the summer, a Clinton aide inadvertently admitted that Hillary was not fit for the presidency. Campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri said in August that Clinton “didn’t really think it through” when she chose to use her personal email account rather than a secure government account for official State Department business.

Palmieri likely didn’t realize at the time that she was saying Clinton did not have the judgment to be president. But that was the essence of it.

And it wasn’t the first time an aide has inadvertently made the honest admission that Clinton isn’t fit to serve as America’s chief executive. In January 2013, only days before Clinton left the State Department, close and trusted assistant Huma Abedin emailed a colleague that Hillary is “often confused.”

Abedin’s statement was a memo to another aide, Monica Hanley, who was to go over calls with Clinton and remind her that she had one upcoming with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

We learned about this email only Monday, when Judicial Watch released another batch of Clinton emails it had received from its Freedom of Information request. But at least we’re learning that Clinton is prone to confusion well ahead of the 2016 election. That’s information the American people deserve to know.

Those who’ve been paying attention, though, know that Clinton has been confused for some time. Consider these moments of befuddlement from Clinton’s career:

• In 2008 she said that she was forced to run across the tarmac to avoid sniper fire just after landing in Bosnia in 1996 on a first lady trip. Video showed her calmly walking across the tarmac.

• She has claimed, first in 1994, that she tried to join the Marines in the 1970s but was turned down because, at 26, she was too old. The story hasn’t been confirmed and few — probably no one, actually — believes it.

• In 1995, somehow documents wanted by federal investigators suddenly turned up at the White House after having been “missing” for almost two years. They were billing documents from the Rose Law Firm where Clinton worked and became involved in the Whitewater scandal. Clinton said she had “no idea” how they got there.

• Shortly after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Clinton said her daughter Chelsea had been jogging around the World Trade Center that morning and popped into a coffee shop by the time the jets hit, a decision that saved her life. She even said Chelsea heard one of the planes hit a tower. None of it was true.

• Last year, she told the country in a network interview that she and Bill were “dead broke” when they left the White House in 2001. PolitiFact said this claim is “mostly false.”

Then there’s all the confusion about what caused the Benghazi terrorist attacks, the subpoena from the Select Committee on Benghazi she said she never received, the classified material on her personal email account, her role in the peace process in Northern Ireland, how she turned $1,000 into $100,000 investing in cattle futures, and that vast right-wing conspiracy.

That’s a lot of confusion. Or maybe it’s just a lot of lies.

SNICK! even her aides clam she's confused.

http://www.investors.com/politics/co...gence-meeting/

Hillary Clinton once questioned candidate Barack Obama’s ability to handle an emergency 3 a.m. phone call in the White House. It turns out she can’t even make a 9:30 a.m. call.

Yet she still craves the presidency.

In a Clinton television ad released in February 2008, the narrator talks about a “dangerous world” and announces that “there’s a phone in the White House, and it’s ringing” He then asks: “Who do you want answering the phone?” the implication being that Obama wasn’t the seasoned hand that Clinton was.

Nearly five years later, Clinton herself slept through what would have been a 9:30 a.m. post-Benghazi intelligence meeting. This is another valuable insight into Clinton’s behavior that we’re learning through the release of her State Department emails.

Among a batch of emails published last week by Judicial Watch, which had received them through court orders after filing Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, was a thread between Clinton and aide Monica Hanley. At 9:17 a.m. on Saturday, Sept. 15, 2012, four days after the Benghazi terrorist attacks, Hanley told Clinton via email that “Dan will be at Whitehaven with the PDB at 9:30 a.m. this morning. He has some sensitive items that he would like to personally show you when he arrives.”

Clinton’s response at 10:43 a.m.: “I just woke up so I missed Dan.”

Are we supposed to believe that she’ll be more vigilant as president than she was as secretary of state?

Judicial Watch says the meeting that Clinton’s staff was trying to arrange was to be “about sensitive intelligence issues, including the Presidential Daily Brief, on a day she was to make a slew of phone calls to foreign leaders.” Since there was apparently no meeting, Clinton was therefore ill-prepared and at a disadvantage when she spoke to these foreign leaders later in the day.

Is this really the person who deserves to be president? Clinton’s running as a former secretary of state, but she has no foreign policy achievements to speak of. In fact, she left a trail of disasters behind. Libya. Iraq. Russia. The Islamic State. The entire Middle East in general is in a worse place today than when Obama took office and hired Clinton to be his secretary of state.

Her judgment is in question, as well. As another aide admitted over the summer, Clinton is not fit for the presidency and yet another has acknowledged that Clinton is “often confused.”

If another candidate makes an ad about a wake-up call for the 2016 election, it should be about a wake-up call for voters, warning them to stay away from Clinton’s name on the ballot.

http://www.investors.com/hillary-cli...uma%20confused

Quote

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_Howell_Rodham

Born Dorothy Emma Howell
June 4, 1919
Chicago, Illinois, U.S.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninete...s_Constitution

The Nineteenth Amendment (Amendment XIX) to the United States Constitution prohibits any United States citizen from being denied the right to vote on the basis of sex. It was ratified on August 18, 1920

there's your links fat old pig. not shut the fuck up. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

In the link you posted,
On June 4, 1919, it was brought before the Senate and, after a long discussion, it was passed with 56 ayes and 25 nays.
You listened to j douche, ran your mouth, and now you're eating your own words.

YouWrong.

Sad. Really sad. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Still haven't looked so you double down on j douche. Unbelievably sad.

I sure see a lot of boasting, puffing up, etc., but nobody has owned up to the fact that JDrunk's OP was bullshit.

Proven bullshit. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

He was right. You're wrong. In this case it's in the books. Next j douche topic.

is it? you vote for this liar. we won't. pig
You definitely picked the better liar. Has she lied? I'm sure she has. Has trump lied?
Publically, frequently and on a variety of subjects. His university was a fraud, preying on....people like his own supporters. People who believed in him and wanted to be like him. After he took their money they found out what he thought of them.

did you know that according to the HildeWhore, she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary the first mountaineer to successfully climb Mt. Everest and live to prove it? ahahaha

http://www.investors.com/hillary-cli...uma%20confused

a "slight" problem with that ...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary

• During her husband’s first term, she said she was named after Sir Edmund Hillary, the first man to climb Mt. Everest. Snopes.com says the story “was almost certainly a bit of fiction invented for political expediency.” In fact, Clinton was born in 1947; Hillary the climber reached Everest’s summit in 1953.

Born Hillary Diane Rodham
October 26, 1947 (age 68)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hillary_Clinton

hahaha SNICK! let's look at more of the Hildewhore's many lies ..

Election 2016: A top aide to Hillary Clinton told a colleague almost three years ago that the then-secretary of state was “often confused.” Does the nation really want a frequently befuddled president?

Over the summer, a Clinton aide inadvertently admitted that Hillary was not fit for the presidency. Campaign communications director Jennifer Palmieri said in August that Clinton “didn’t really think it through” when she chose to use her personal email account rather than a secure government account for official State Department business.

Palmieri likely didn’t realize at the time that she was saying Clinton did not have the judgment to be president. But that was the essence of it.

And it wasn’t the first time an aide has inadvertently made the honest admission that Clinton isn’t fit to serve as America’s chief executive. In January 2013, only days before Clinton left the State Department, close and trusted assistant Huma Abedin emailed a colleague that Hillary is “often confused.”

Abedin’s statement was a memo to another aide, Monica Hanley, who was to go over calls with Clinton and remind her that she had one upcoming with Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh.

We learned about this email only Monday, when Judicial Watch released another batch of Clinton emails it had received from its Freedom of Information request. But at least we’re learning that Clinton is prone to confusion well ahead of the 2016 election. That’s information the American people deserve to know.

Those who’ve been paying attention, though, know that Clinton has been confused for some time. Consider these moments of befuddlement from Clinton’s career:

• In 2008 she said that she was forced to run across the tarmac to avoid sniper fire just after landing in Bosnia in 1996 on a first lady trip. Video showed her calmly walking across the tarmac.

• She has claimed, first in 1994, that she tried to join the Marines in the 1970s but was turned down because, at 26, she was too old. The story hasn’t been confirmed and few — probably no one, actually — believes it.

• In 1995, somehow documents wanted by federal investigators suddenly turned up at the White House after having been “missing” for almost two years. They were billing documents from the Rose Law Firm where Clinton worked and became involved in the Whitewater scandal. Clinton said she had “no idea” how they got there.

• Shortly after the 9-11 terrorist attacks, Clinton said her daughter Chelsea had been jogging around the World Trade Center that morning and popped into a coffee shop by the time the jets hit, a decision that saved her life. She even said Chelsea heard one of the planes hit a tower. None of it was true.

• Last year, she told the country in a network interview that she and Bill were “dead broke” when they left the White House in 2001. PolitiFact said this claim is “mostly false.”

Then there’s all the confusion about what caused the Benghazi terrorist attacks, the subpoena from the Select Committee on Benghazi she said she never received, the classified material on her personal email account, her role in the peace process in Northern Ireland, how she turned $1,000 into $100,000 investing in cattle futures, and that vast right-wing conspiracy.

That’s a lot of confusion. Or maybe it’s just a lot of lies.

SNICK! even her aides clam she's confused.

http://www.investors.com/politics/co...gence-meeting/

Hillary Clinton once questioned candidate Barack Obama’s ability to handle an emergency 3 a.m. phone call in the White House. It turns out she can’t even make a 9:30 a.m. call.

Yet she still craves the presidency.

In a Clinton television ad released in February 2008, the narrator talks about a “dangerous world” and announces that “there’s a phone in the White House, and it’s ringing” He then asks: “Who do you want answering the phone?” the implication being that Obama wasn’t the seasoned hand that Clinton was.

Nearly five years later, Clinton herself slept through what would have been a 9:30 a.m. post-Benghazi intelligence meeting. This is another valuable insight into Clinton’s behavior that we’re learning through the release of her State Department emails.

Among a batch of emails published last week by Judicial Watch, which had received them through court orders after filing Freedom of Information Act lawsuits, was a thread between Clinton and aide Monica Hanley. At 9:17 a.m. on Saturday, Sept. 15, 2012, four days after the Benghazi terrorist attacks, Hanley told Clinton via email that “Dan will be at Whitehaven with the PDB at 9:30 a.m. this morning. He has some sensitive items that he would like to personally show you when he arrives.”

Clinton’s response at 10:43 a.m.: “I just woke up so I missed Dan.”

Are we supposed to believe that she’ll be more vigilant as president than she was as secretary of state?

Judicial Watch says the meeting that Clinton’s staff was trying to arrange was to be “about sensitive intelligence issues, including the Presidential Daily Brief, on a day she was to make a slew of phone calls to foreign leaders.” Since there was apparently no meeting, Clinton was therefore ill-prepared and at a disadvantage when she spoke to these foreign leaders later in the day.

Is this really the person who deserves to be president? Clinton’s running as a former secretary of state, but she has no foreign policy achievements to speak of. In fact, she left a trail of disasters behind. Libya. Iraq. Russia. The Islamic State. The entire Middle East in general is in a worse place today than when Obama took office and hired Clinton to be his secretary of state.

Her judgment is in question, as well. As another aide admitted over the summer, Clinton is not fit for the presidency and yet another has acknowledged that Clinton is “often confused.”

If another candidate makes an ad about a wake-up call for the 2016 election, it should be about a wake-up call for voters, warning them to stay away from Clinton’s name on the ballot.
There you go again. Right idea but, imko, wrong again. There's that bitterness clouding your judgment again.

http://www.investors.com/hillary-cli...uma%20confused Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Blah, blah, blah.
A poor attempt at hijacking the thread and an even more poor attempt at a subject change.
A total lack of personal responsibility?

Oh yeah. And then some.

What else have you got?

Quote

In the link you posted,
On June 4, 1919, it was brought before the Senate and, after a long discussion, it was passed with 56 ayes and 25 nays.
You listened to j douche, ran your mouth, and now you're eating your own words.

Still haven't looked so you double down on j douche. Unbelievably sad.

He was right. You're wrong. In this case it's in the books. Next j douche topic.

Blah, blah, blah.
A poor attempt at hijacking the thread and an even more poor attempt at a subject change.
A total lack of personal responsibility?

Oh yeah. And then some.

What else have you got? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

blah blah blah back at you. white noise

Quote

Yep. WWE is a total idioT. No wonder he looks up to JJunk!

Oh, and BTW, we don't need YOUR votd to win.

Your continued carping, raging and pants-shitting only goes to amplify the ugliness against which Americans will reject in YUGE numbers.

Then you, SLOBBRIN, JL and the pissheads from Pissburgh will be outta here.

Get your licks in now. THis country will vote its values. And they're not yours!

Quote

Then you, SLOBBRIN, JL and the pissheads from Pissburgh will be outta here. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You looking for me, oinkboy? What a paranoid dipshit you are! I haven't even posted in this thread yet. I must really get under your gay libtard skin to make you lash out at me even when I haven't posted, eh cabana boy? Better mark your calendar, douchebag. Your other "Pissburgh" nemesis Bambino will be back to stomp your ugly faggoty ass soon. Expect him to pop up right around Convention time.

By the way, your favorite putdown of the next Stanley Cup-winning hometown is as lame and flaccid as your dick. But then, you like to hear the word "piss" dontcha? It puts you in the mood for golden showers at your regular Friday night Austin Reacharound Crew fuck-and-suck party. Can't wait, huh oinkboy? You and all your little Austin piggies pissing and fucking and frolicking in the mud.... Oink, oink! Enjoy!

Now that I'm here, I might as well put this thread back on topic... we're talking about politicians who lie about their mothers, right? Here's a post I made 6 months ago on the subject. Odumbo is hard to beat in that category. Dontcha just love assholes who make up stories about their own mother's death to advance their political careers and libtard agendas? It doesn't get any slimier or more despicable than that, does it oinkboy?

What's your favorite Odumbo lie.... so many to choose from.... hmmm.... think I'll go with the one about his mother's insurance problems.... even the New York Times couldn't ignore that one.... but it was all for a good cause.... to enact Odumbocare.... it's a litmus test for libtard loyalty - would you be willing to lie about your own mother if it helped to achieve a govt takeover of healthcare???

OBAMA SAID, HELL YES - I'LL LIE ABOUT MY DEAD MOTHER!!!

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2011/07/14.../14mother.html Originally Posted by lustylad

Quote

blah blah blah back at you. white noise

Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

So white noise is your excuse? I accept you have an excuse. That's not it but it sounds like the best you can do.

Quote

Heard the latest? At least one Hillary's personal emails was marked CONFIDENTIAL.

Quote

You looking for me, oinkboy? What a paranoid dipshit you are! I haven't even posted in this thread yet. I must really get under your gay libtard skin to make you lash out at me even when I haven't posted, eh cabana boy? Better mark your calendar, douchebag. Your other "Pissburgh" nemesis Bambino will be back to stomp your ugly faggoty ass soon. Expect him to pop up right around Convention time.

By the way, your favorite putdown of the next Stanley Cup-winning hometown is as lame and flaccid as your dick. But then, you like to hear the word "piss" dontcha? It puts you in the mood for golden showers at your regular Friday night Austin Reacharound Crew fuck-and-suck party. Can't wait, huh oinkboy? You and all your little Austin piggies pissing and fucking and frolicking in the mud.... Oink, oink! Enjoy!
Since you know so much about it, you must be the asshole of honor. It looks like you'll be spending the evening like your life. Alone.
Now that I'm here, I might as well put this thread back on topic... we're talking about politicians who lie about their mothers, right? Here's a post I made 6 months ago on the subject. Odumbo is hard to beat in that category. Dontcha just love assholes who make up stories about their own mother's death to advance their political careers and libtard agendas? It doesn't get any slimier or more despicable than that, does it oinkboy? Originally Posted by lustylad

Quote

Heard the latest? At least one Hillary's personal emails was marked CONFIDENTIAL. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

What a cool thing to start a thread about!!

Now you wouldn't be lying about this too would you?

Quote

Heard the latest? At least one Hillary's personal emails was marked CONFIDENTIAL. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Was that the one describing the anticipated drone strikes, or was that the one about the contributor's appointment to the intelligence committee in the DOS?

It occurs to me that if folks want the First Female President they would select someone who had plenty of intelligence, knowledge, and integrity with a shit load of administrative/executive experience on running large operations.

It further occurs to me that the country has already learned that "Firsts" are not always BEST regardless of the sentiment! Do we need 8 more years? That's 16 years of incompetence.

Quote

It occurs to me that if folks want the First Female President ..... Originally Posted by LexusLover

does hillary truly identify as a female?

think of the glass ceiling being shattered..our first transgendered president!

what better way to try to unite the bern supporters

Quote

You didn't put the thread back on topic, Junior. YOu arrogantly and intentionally attempted to hijack it yet again.

This thread is about JDRunk's OP; A flat out misrepresentation turned into a lie turned into an attack

Who gives a shit about hockey? OR pissburg?

Maybe when you and your Butt Buddies exit the forum you'll have time to think about your utter failure.

Quote

You didn't put the thread back on topic, Junior. YOu arrogantly and intentionally attempted to hijack it yet again. READ THE THREAD TITLE AGAIN, OINKBOY. SOMETHING ABOUT LYING ABOUT YOUR MOTHER - AM I RIGHT? AND DON'T FORGET TO WHINE ABOUT DICKMUNCHER BEING OFF-TOPIC. DID TRUMP LIE ABOUT HIS MOTHER? NOPE, THAT WOULD SLIMY AND DESPICABLE.

Who gives a shit about hockey? NOT SISSY BOYS LIKE ASSUP! EEWWW! THEY SMASH EACH OTHER WITH STICKS! I CAN'T BEAR TO WATCH IT! EEWWW!

OR pissburg? SHHH! THAT'S ASSUP'S SECRET CODE WORD FOR GOLDEN SHOWERS!

Maybe when you and your Butt Buddies exit the forum you'll have time to think about your utter failure. COULD I BE ANY LAMER IF I TRIED? NOPE. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

OINK, OINK!

Quote