Serious question for the providers

She was either loose or you have a little winky...ijs Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

Some guys do, and yes some gals could deliver a baby sideways.

She was either loose or you have a little winky...ijs Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

I might be in love..lol

She was either loose or you have a little winky...ijs Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe

LOL- so you know guys will always claim to be a "Magnum" right up to the point where they have to actually pull it out, but who are the honest ladies who will have the "Stick Your Whole Goddamm Leg In There" size on the nightstand instead of the "Velvet Vise Grip"?

Jessica.

I have a feeling you would get an excellent review from me.

LOL- so you know guys will always claim to be a "Magnum" right up to the point where they have to actually pull it out, but who are the honest ladies who will have the "Stick Your Whole Goddamm Leg In There" size on the nightstand instead of the "Velvet Vise Grip"?
Originally Posted by zeejoe

I'm not a "Magnum guy" in the traditional sense but I learned from a great "now deceased" provider that Magnums can be used on a lot of guys in the average or above category. The looser fit increases sensation which is much better than a tight fitting thin condom. Definitely need extra care when pulling out though.

...If you look at RipClaw25's profile the last three reviews he's written were NOs and he's written five total NO reviews. Originally Posted by JessicaKCRabbit

Those simple numbers alone do not tell the complete story about the reviewer you wish to portray. Unless you have access to private information, the reasons for two of the three NOs are evident. Do you have access to private information or does someone close to you have access?

It is the reviewer's choice to recommend Yes or No as it is your option to tell your side of the story as you have done. Criticizing him for submitting NO recommendations is akin to criticizing you for telling your side of the story.

Those simple numbers alone do not tell the complete story about the reviewer you wish to portray. Unless you have access to private information, the reasons for two of the three NOs are evident. Do you have access to private information or does someone close to you have access?

It is the reviewer's choice to recommend Yes or No as it is your option to tell your side of the story as you have done. Criticizing him for submitting NO recommendations is akin to criticizing you for telling your side of the story. Originally Posted by scorpio31

You're right, I'm done commenting on the subject after this. I do NOT have ANY access to PA so I don't know why he's written so many NO reviews. It just seemed like maybe it's not the provider's faults if he continues to keep having a bad time. Be it lack of research what have you, RipClaw25 told me himself why the reason for the no, so there's no one giving me info he told me himself. I also stated that the lack of research and COMMUNICATION was the ultimate downfall of said session with him. He wasn't satisfied and I was unaware. If we had communicated better I feel this wouldn't have happened.

I have given my response to both no reviews so I'm not going to continue to argue, I've spoken my peace. Just stating that no I have no WK or insider information, just personal judgments. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and everyone has had an opportunity to say where they stand. I hope to learn from this experience and everyone's comments and move forward towards being the best provider I can be. I will continue to provide outstanding service and work harder to ensure customer satisfaction. And if this ever happens again let's pray it doesn't but the next time I think I will handle things differently. I do think I'm entitled to give my side of the story just as everyone else, but as things usually go on the internet, things got really out of hand really quickly and I regret my approach to the situation. Like I said tho, onward and forward! Only thing I can do.

You're right, I'm done commenting on the subject after this. I do NOT have ANY access to PA so I don't know why he's written so many NO reviews. It just seemed like maybe it's not the provider's faults if he continues to keep having a bad time. Be it lack of research what have you, RipClaw25 told me himself why the reason for the no, so there's no one giving me info he told me himself. I also stated that the lack of research and COMMUNICATION was the ultimate downfall of said session with him. He wasn't satisfied and I was unaware. If we had communicated better I feel this wouldn't have happened.

I have given my response to both no reviews so I'm not going to continue to argue, I've spoken my peace. Just stating that no I have no WK or insider information, just personal judgments. Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, and everyone has had an opportunity to say where they stand. I hope to learn from this experience and everyone's comments and move forward towards being the best provider I can be. I will continue to provide outstanding service and work harder to ensure customer satisfaction. And if this ever happens again let's pray it doesn't but the next time I think I will handle things differently. I do think I'm entitled to give my side of the story just as everyone else, but as things usually go on the internet, things got really out of hand really quickly and I regret my approach to the situation. Like I said tho, onward and forward! Only thing I can do. Originally Posted by JessicaKCRabbit

So was it also not your fault when you received the other NO reviews you have? You're talking as if you have never gotten a NO review if you didn't learn from the first one what makes you think your going to learn from the next one & the next one after that & etc.. The best thing for you to do is not post at all regarding your NO review because it makes your situation worse...

LOL- so you know guys will always claim to be a "Magnum" right up to the point where they have to actually pull it out, but who are the honest ladies who will have the "Stick Your Whole Goddamm Leg In There" size on the nightstand instead of the "Velvet Vise Grip"?
Originally Posted by zeejoe

I don't know because that's not a problem of mine

Hello.

I have been following this thread since it started and I have just a couple of things to say.

I read the review and frankly I was surprised at the No. I think it is the format. If the review is going to end with a No recommendation I feel there should be a place to explain the ...No

Obviously a review that ends with a Yes ...we can read the rating and the service and see...Yes.

In the OP's No...we are left confused. He asked for a single Service Provider...shortly before the meeting he asked for a double. His needs were met.

He described the meeting. It started on time. A double was provided on short notice. He wasn't shorted on time or effort.

Did he find the smell of smoke offensive? How do I know...he didn't say. Did he asked the girls to wash?...Did he provide them mouthwash....did he complain....I don't believe he did.

Did he complain that he was having trouble with the Hat....Yes. I believe that is his problem.

Frankly, a NO deserves an explanation. A yes is implied. A No leaves too much to the imagination because there is ...zero explanation.

Will I see Jessica? Probably...because I believe she is being maligned without an explanation I don't get to read the ROS. So, if I am supposed to make a choice based on limited information I am going to lean towards the positive.

So...from that positive place I have decide the OP's review is irrelevant.

I feel Jessica had a right to defend herself.

I am not a White Knight. Just a casual observer who has an opinion.

Good luck everyone.

Hello.

I have been following this thread since it started and I have just a couple of things to say.

I read the review and frankly I was surprised at the No. I think it is the format. If the review is going to end with a No recommendation I feel there should be a place to explain the ...No

Obviously a review that ends with a Yes ...we can read the rating and the service and see...Yes.

In the OP's No...we are left confused. He asked for a single Service Provider...shortly before the meeting he asked for a double. His needs were met.

He described the meeting. It started on time. A double was provided on short notice. He wasn't shorted on time or effort.

Did he find the smell of smoke offensive? How do I know...he didn't say. Did he asked the girls to wash?...Did he provide them mouthwash....did he complain....I don't believe he did.

Did he complain that he was having trouble with the Hat....Yes. I believe that is his problem.

Frankly, a NO deserves an explanation. A yes is implied. A No leaves too much to the imagination because there is ...zero explanation.

Will I see Jessica? Probably...because I believe she is being maligned without an explanation I don't get to read the ROS. So, if I am supposed to make a choice based on limited information I am going to lean towards the positive.

So...from that positive place I have decide the OP's review is irrelevant.

I feel Jessica had a right to defend herself.

I am not a White Knight. Just a casual observer who has an opinion.

Good luck everyone. Originally Posted by Mrpracticle

I hope you're not revealing ROS information

I do not have ROS 411. I made that clear.

You said you read the review. Not much to read without seeing the ROS...

I read the review. I expressed how I felt about it based on the parameters set by this site.

I read the response.

I sat in silence for a couple of days....contemplated my response...made it clear...Quite clear.

I am not arguing with anyone....just stating my opinion.

I do not have ROS 411. I made that clear. Originally Posted by Mrpracticle

No you said you read the review & what you described isnt what I see so you revealed ROS information