Who won the 2nd presidential debate?

They were both throwing mud on each other. I really don't want to vote for either of them now.

New polls say she kicked his ass. More important she's widening her lead to double digits nationwide. She's now up 11 points. 14 if you subtract the 3rd party candidates.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/firs...digits-n663691

Sweet.

New polls say she kicked his ass. More important she's widening her lead to double digits nationwide. She's now up 11 points. 14 if you subtract the 3rd party candidates.

http://www.nbcnews.com/politics/firs...digits-n663691

Sweet. Originally Posted by SisterTwister

Noboby But Clinton is a Clinton propaganda wing of the Clinton Machine. If you mean to prove a point you need to cite an unbiased source, twisted knickers

Noboby But Clinton is a Clinton propaganda wing of the Clinton Machine. If you mean to prove a point you need to cite an unbiased source, twisted knickers Originally Posted by I B Hankering

I don't need to "prove a point" to you because I don't really care what you believe. The polls won't please you no matter which one I cite. What do you suggest? Fox? Brietbart? The Moscow Times? Anyone with a firm grasp of reality watching that brooding, sniffling, stalking moron creepily shadowing her around the stage, rambling incoherently, threatening to seize dictatorial powers to jail his opponent, and avoiding answering every question he was asked knows who won and if wasn't the serial sexual predator who thinks his daughter's a nice piece of ass.

Even the GOP lawmakers who have stuck by this bumbling buffoon are now abandoning this sack of crap because they can now read the writing on the wall.

They were both throwing mud on each other. I really don't want to vote for either of them now. Originally Posted by R.M.

Join the increasingly large number of people who feel that way.

2016 is a lost cause. Go become active in one party or the other. Register not as an independent--help take one of the parties back away from giving us horrid candidates.

I don't need to "prove a point" to you because I don't really care what you believe. The polls won't please you no matter which one I cite. What do you suggest? Fox? Brietbart? The Moscow Times? Anyone with a firm grasp of reality watching that brooding, sniffling, stalking moron creepily shadowing her around the stage, rambling incoherently, threatening to seize dictatorial powers to jail his opponent, and avoiding answering every question he was asked knows who won and if wasn't the serial sexual predator who thinks his daughter's a nice piece of ass.

Even the GOP lawmakers who have stuck by this bumbling buffoon are now abandoning this sack of crap because they can now read the writing on the wall. Originally Posted by SisterTwister

Funny how you lib-retards who never gave a crap about the POV of establishment Rinos now want to hang your whole arguement on what they say and do, twisted knickers. BTW, The Moscow Times or Jerusalem Post would be infinitely more neutral than the Clinton News Network, etc., twisted kinckers.

I don't need to "prove a point" to you because I don't really care what you believe. The polls won't please you no matter which one I cite. What do you suggest? Fox? Brietbart? The Moscow Times? Anyone with a firm grasp of reality watching that brooding, sniffling, stalking moron creepily shadowing her around the stage, rambling incoherently, threatening to seize dictatorial powers to jail his opponent, and avoiding answering every question he was asked knows who won and if wasn't the serial sexual predator who thinks his daughter's a nice piece of ass.

Even the GOP lawmakers who have stuck by this bumbling buffoon are now abandoning this sack of crap because they can now read the writing on the wall. Originally Posted by SisterTwister

New handle? You're still a sap sucker.

Funny how you lib-retards who never gave a crap about the POV of establishment Rinos now want to hang your whole arguement on what they say and do, twisted knickers. BTW, The Moscow Times or Jerusalem Post would be infinitely more neutral than the Clinton News Network, etc., twisted kinckers. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You need to get your spell check checked, IBWebster!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!

Funny how you lib-retards who never gave a crap about the POV of establishment Rinos now want to hang your whole arguement on what they say and do, twisted knickers. BTW, The Moscow Times or Jerusalem Post would be infinitely more neutral than the Clinton News Network, etc., twisted kinckers. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Rinos? LOL fool I don't give a fuck about your ignorant hillbilly party I'm just pointing out facts you can't accept. As far as your "Rino" characterization though...this fascist bullshit might appeal to you and your Klan buddies but whether you like it or not a third of your party isn't going to even vote. Even more than that think this imbecile is disqualified from even running.

Crawl out from under your Breitbart rock, put down the meth and your copy of The Turner Diaries and open your eyes. Every reputable poll says she won easily. Every one has her increasing her lead nationally. Why do you think two dozen Rethug lawmakers have now bailed on his ignorant racist ass? Why do you think Paul Ryan is now focused only on down ballot races? Why do you think the Rethugs pulled his party funding? Because they know he's done, and if they stuck with him they'd be done too.

This fucktard wants to bang his own daughter moron. Maybe that shit lights your fire and that's the appeal? Maybe you have a white sheet hanging in the closet? Or maybe you're just one of his typical demographic...a poorly educated angry white dude who needs reassurance that you're still relevant...I don't really give two shits what your motivation is. The point is your insane leader is fucked. Even his buddy Putin can't save his stupid ass now.

Here are two words you should get used to hearing a lot...

"Madame President"

Are you banging your sister TWISTER?

Originally Posted by i'va biggen

LOL, that's funny

Rinos? LOL fool I don't give a fuck about your ignorant hillbilly party I'm just pointing out facts you can't accept. As far as your "Rino" characterization though...this fascist bullshit might appeal to you and your Klan buddies but whether you like it or not a third of your party isn't going to even vote. Even more than that think this imbecile is disqualified from even running.

Crawl out from under your Breitbart rock, put down the meth and your copy of The Turner Diaries and open your eyes. Every reputable poll says she won easily. Every one has her increasing her lead nationally. Why do you think two dozen Rethug lawmakers have now bailed on his ignorant racist ass? Why do you think Paul Ryan is now focused only on down ballot races? Why do you think the Rethugs pulled his party funding? Because they know he's done, and if they stuck with him they'd be done too.

This fucktard wants to bang his own daughter moron. Maybe that shit lights your fire and that's the appeal? Maybe you have a white sheet hanging in the closet? Or maybe you're just one of his typical demographic...a poorly educated angry white dude who needs reassurance that you're still relevant...I don't really give two shits what your motivation is. The point is your insane leader is fucked. Even his buddy Putin can't save his stupid ass now.

Here are two words you should get used to hearing a lot...

"Madame President" Originally Posted by SisterTwister

Pull your shit lathered head out of your ass and read the Wikileak's articles that got Debbie Wasserman Schultz fired, twisted knickers: there are no reputable lame-stream media outlets, twisted knickers! Wikileaks has revealed that the lame-stream media is hook, line and sinker in bed with hildebeest, you "#Grubered" stupid minion. The release today shows hildebeest received a heads-up on a question she'd be asked in a debate with Bernie, twisted knickers.

And hildebeest is your fuckin' fascist candidate, twisted knickers. Hildebeest is the statist candidate supported by the bankers and financiers promoting the statist agenda to aggrandize govenment and abridge the 1st, 2nd, 4th, 5th and 10th Amendment rights of American citizens, twisted knickers. Hildebeest is the statist candidate that committed the U.S. to a failed interventionist policy in Libya, you blabbering POS lib-retard, which helped ISIS expand into North Africa.