Not really as common as you think. Accidents are more likely than a drunken shooting and no one said accidents don't happen. The FBI says that about 3 million times a year someone uses a weapon to protect themselves or others.
Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
I used "drunken shooter" but could have just as easily said "shooter". On Sunday in the paper there was a story of a man in Round Rock, Texas shooting his wife and then himself after an argument. Many such incidents are done under the influence of alcohol, just as many car deaths are done under the influence of alcohol. In Cedar Park, Texas, there have been 5 homicides inside the home in recent years -- 3 times a man shot and killed his SO and 2 times turned the gun on himself. And accidents certainly happen too.
I'd like you to cite a specific article released by the FBI or any other reputable organization that says about 3 million times a year someone uses a weapon to protect themselves or others.
Here are some articles which believe most claims that guns are used often in deterring crime are over stated:
". . .the Violence Policy Center
released a fresh analysis of federal crime and health data that explores how often potential victims actually turned the tables. Parsing 2012 numbers, the center counted 259 justifiable gun-related homicides, or incidents in which authorities ruled that killings occurred in self-defense."
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opini...619-story.html
"The study, released Wednesday by the Violence Policy Center, found there were 258 justifiable homicides involving civilians using firearms in 2012, compared with 8,342 murders by gun. Even if a criminal isn’t shot down, the study found that civilians rarely use guns to protect themselves.
“Intended victims of property crimes engaged in self-protective behavior with a firearm” only 0.1 percent of the times they were targeted by a crook."
Source:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...=.706c960293b2
"What do these and so many other cases have in common?
They are the byproduct of a tragic myth: that millions of gun owners successfully use their firearms to defend themselves and their families from criminals. Despite having nearly no academic support in public health literature, this myth is the
single largest motivation behind gun ownership. It traces its origin to a two-decade-old series of surveys that, despite being thoroughly repudiated at the time, persists in influencing personal safety decisions and public policy throughout the United States."
Source:
https://www.armedwithreason.com/debu...-gun-use-myth/
"We use epidemiological theory to explain why the “false positive” problem for rare events can lead to large overestimates of the incidence of rare diseases or rare phenomena such as self-defense gun use. We then try to validate the claims of many millions of annual self-defense uses against available evidence.
We find that the claim of many millions of annual self-defense gun uses by American citizens is invalid.
"
Source: https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/hicrc/f...nse-gun-use-2/
As I said, I'd like you to cite data used in making your 3 million statement. I must be looking in the wrong place because I can't find it.