Search for Malaysian Airlines flight MH370 is called off...

Keep trying fool.

You are being under-inclusive.

LOTS of people, including ExNYer, dogged JDB about his explanation. Not just BigTex. Originally Posted by Revenant

Dude please, it's obvious.


Jim

Try a "theory" that makes at least some sense, OK? That's pretty much a tacit requirement in any argument. You can't just say "space aliens did it" and claim that's a theory..

With the wings cut off, what good is the plane?

JDBarleycorn"s "theory" was that the plane was hijacked and then hidden to be later used in another 9-11 style attack.

BUUUUUUT, if you toss the wings in the ocean, now you can't fly the plan in your 9-11 attack, right?

Unless you get new wings, right? But how do you get those? You can't just get them at Costco.

Achmed and Faisal have to go back to Airbus - the ONLY supplier - to get replacement pieces. But you can't just buy them. For safety records and liability purposes, every single part of commercial aircraft is tracked in case there is an accident and to ensure their maintenance schedules are adhered to.

So how do the towelheads explain their need for wings?

And then there is the COST of the wings and labor in reattaching them. Are you saying that your "theory" is that the terrorists threw away perfectly good wing parts, then paid millions to get replacements, and then reattached them with such skill that the plane was now airworthy again?

And tossing the wings in the ocean won't ensure they are found in a timely manner to fool authorities into calling off the search. The wings parts were found more than a year after the plane went missing. The hidden, wingless plane could have been found while the discarded wings were floating around.
Originally Posted by Revenant

thanx for rehashing the pie-in-the-sky theory.

Would someone who attended Cougar High be familiar with the word "revenant"?

Dude please, it's obvious.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Oh, you mean like the moon landing being stage and Sandy Hooking shooting being a false flag operation? Those are the things that are obvious to you, right?

Would someone who attended Cougar High be familiar with the word "revenant"? Originally Posted by chicagoboy

If they thought it was spelled correctly.

Oh, you mean like the moon landing being stage and Sandy Hooking shooting being a false flag operation? Those are the things that are obvious to you, right?
Originally Posted by Revenant

That's right, you're catching on Bigtex,/ ExNYer whoever, but you need to check your spelling your post had some misspelled words in it.


Jim

If they thought it was spelled correctly. Originally Posted by LexusLover

If they were from Cougar High, they probably would!!

You have also completely forgotten that they found parts of the plane washed up on shore in the Indian Ocean. That's proof that the plane went down in the ocean. They just haven't found the fuselage and bodies.

Or do you another theory that explains how the body of the plane could be hidden under camouflage on an island while pieces of the wing are floating in the ocean? Originally Posted by Revenant

Yea ... you said "theory" right? Wings were cut off and tossed in the ocean to drift around until found .... Just to set the record straight and keep it that way ... I don't think that happened, but you asked for a "theory" to explain what was found. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Try a "theory" that makes at least some sense, OK? That's pretty much a tacit requirement in any argument.
Originally Posted by Revenant

Actually, it's YOUR TACIT REQUIREMENT .... AFTER THE FACT!

You asked the question. You didn't like the answer!

That's your problem.

Actually, it's YOUR TACIT REQUIREMENT .... AFTER THE FACT!

You asked the question. You didn't like the answer!

That's your problem. Originally Posted by LexusLover

No, it's a tacit - and pre-existing - requirement in any intelligent argument. The fact that you didn't know that is YOUR problem.

But did you have any SUBSTANTIVE response to what I wrote? Nah. Didn't think so.

No, it's a tacit - and pre-existing - requirement in any intelligent argument. The fact that you didn't know that is YOUR problem.

But did you have any SUBSTANTIVE response to what I wrote? Nah. Didn't think so. Originally Posted by Revenant

Get a new handle, Retardant...

Get a new handle, Retardant... Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

My handle is "Revenant", faggot. No "The" in the name. Keep your movie clips.

It appears that the underwater search for the missing Malaysian Airlines flight has been called off:

http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/17/asia/m...ded/index.html

However, in response to a radical new theory about what happened to MH370, it appears that the international search effort will now be re-directed to searching on land on various Pacific Islands to see if the plane is concealed behind potted plants and camouflage netting.

Keep hope alive! Originally Posted by Revenant

You are trying so hard that it seems like you weren't certain until more of the plane was found. That would have been reasonable, BTW, until they found a few traceable pieces floating in the ocean or washed up onshore.

You have to admit that prior to finding any part of the plane, it is reasonable to consider a hijacking theory. Damn fucking unlikely, but not impossible.