Yep and we get to send the Republican carpet baggers in to take over the "reconstruction".
There will not be any "war", the California government would actually have to allow people to keep and bear arms.....lolfl
Yep and we get to send the Republican carpet baggers in to take over the "reconstruction".... you mean as opposed to "bare arms"?
There will not be any "war", the California government would actually have to allow people to keep and bear arms.....lolfl Originally Posted by The2Dogs
If California is alowed to secede, that will be the end of the USA as we know it. It will set a precedence for other states. Washington, Oregon, New York, all of New England and mid-atlantic states will quickly follow.I agree.
The alternative is civil war. And no, war is not "fun". Just ask those soldiers who came back from Iraq. Especially civil war. Will you shoot your own son? cousins? Friends?
Is this what you all want? To break up the union? All these talks about secession is treasonous. Originally Posted by sunnysideup
....and libtards, you're going to need some jumper cables.You assume a lot of things. Based on a lot of misconceptions. Misconceptions is about as polite I can get. The only reason I can think of is you believe stuff like that because you want to. I think you're wasting your time thinking about it. You people don't get into the details of these stories, do you? The stories I read all said "California" wants to secede. A small group following the rules in Kansas for putting a measure up for consideration would cause those same sources to say "Kansas" wants to secede, not the small percentage that signed the petition. Someone or a group of people has put the motion or measure or whatever method CA uses for initiatives. There is no wide spread support. They will secede by way of an earthquake long before they would vote for it.
Calexit. Good idea, bad idea. We had all the leftists decrying the idea that Texas could, or would, secede from the union but now the Berkenstock is on the other foot. What if California secedes? Can they? Should they? Do they have to take their share of the national debt (including Obama's 10 trillion dollars)? Do they take it per capita? How about that they take a larger share if they voted overwhelming in favor of each president who increased the debt? I assume that they have to pay for all federal land and constructs inside California or there could be war. After all, it was the insistence of the South that Fort Sumter belonged to them and not the federal government who built it. Speaking of "you didn't build that", what about the interstate highways? They have value. Dams, airports, military bases, national monuments...
California may have water now but in the future they're going to have to buy their water from out of state again. Same thing for energy since they refused to build any new power plants. Food? Man (and woman) do not live by almonds and avocadoes alone.
There's more thought provoking things when I have time.
I assume that all of our libtard friends will move to California as soon as the separation becomes reality. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn
That's because the Governor is fake! Californians have a history of putting shit on the ballot and then finding out about it later!
California wanting to secede is fake news. A group in CA trying to get the measure on the ballot is real news. Can you see the difference between the 2 stories? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
That's because the Governor is fake! Californians have a history of putting shit on the ballot and then finding out about it later!Such an angry bitch..
The pass shit that sounds good on paper and then when its implemented it is a disaster. Just like ObaminableCare!
See Pelosi! Originally Posted by LexusLover
My opinion is U.S of America first , sent back the illegals , control who come and goes , get more people in charge that will make that happen , just saying. Originally Posted by rexdutchmanThe whining losers aka Liberals don't want "America First" ...