What would it look like if....

There still is a place with WAY TOO MANY providers.... Guys shouting down at people as they walk through the courtyard to appointments... Ive heard of neighbors filing comings and goings.... Addison address....

Again - There would need to be a "Miss Mona" running the joint.
Yep - the CHICKEN RANCH

Watch this video ... and as corny as it may seem - it tells the truth of what could happen to such a place !

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3uX58tQ7mQ Originally Posted by Torre Tames

Something outside the HUB-BUB ... yes ... a CHICKEN Ranch.

If hobbyist kept all of the girls busy and well paid, it would be paradise. The minute business slowed down for any of the girls, it would turn into hell on earth. Probably end up burned to the ground. Originally Posted by !!Sexy Erotic Morgan

Not if Miss MONA is in charge!

Put together a group of like-minded investors, buy a complex, and execute the business plan. Better act now, though; cap rates in Dallas are getting so high that a lot of potential buyers can't make offers that they feel are prudent. Originally Posted by Sir Lancehernot

Agreed- and so MarkusH .... I'm glad you found my post "sexy" ... however your post as to me not being on topic (below) ... was incorrect. I WAS on topic for this discussion.

Not on topic, but I find your response very sexy!!!! Originally Posted by MarkusH

...even with 93% occupancy the cap rate might max out at 8.4%.... that could pull in about $760K gross profit per year ... you might need extra security on the premises and that would cut into profit as well. Originally Posted by Torre Tames

We will never be Amsterdam - or maybe?
Let's RALLY to create a RED LIGHT district!
I've been there - it is totally cool.

T

Stupidest idea I've read all week, maybe TT can take the fall when this idea hits the fan and deal with the court proceedings. Common sense people and get a room

Agreed- and so MarkusH .... I'm glad you found my post "sexy" ... however your post as to me not being on topic (below) ... was incorrect. I WAS on topic for this discussion. Originally Posted by Torre Tames

Torre Tames, you miss understood. I was saying, I was not on topic, NOT you. Hope this clarifies things.