VIPRaniLane 9 Reviews By 6 Guys all Awesome!

"Does that mean your maturity level is substantially less than hers?" Probably, lol...

1. Absolutely NO
2. see ^^^

So, is that an accusation or an insinuation?

Why don't you pm them and ask why they don't review more? I don't think rain has any control over who reviews her or how often they review. Are you thinking her reviews aren't legit because the guys who reviewed her only reviewed her and no one else. Originally Posted by Goodguy_69

That particular "pattern" is typical in other areas of one of the whores posting her own reviews under a "mandle".... So in other areas it has been seen that the whore being reviewed was definitely in control of the reviews content.....

No way of knowing (unless staff looked into it) if that is the case here but it is not usual to see such a long time whore with no "credible" reviews.....

First off VIPRaniLane thank you for your time and efforts by being a female MOD. A thankless job.
Originally Posted by Still Looking

She doesn't MOD anything guys have anything to do with does she?.... Why is it of concern?

Whoa, I'm curious how this will play out

My question is why do you care sir? Do you not have better things to do? I know for a fact that all of the gentlemen that have reviewed her are more so active on TER. That site is more used in the Western States so maybe they see little to no reason to post here. Again why do you care. Your continued belaboring on this subject borders on disrespect of staff. I believe it's time you move on sir.

She doesn't MOD anything guys have anything to do with does she?.... Why is it of concern? Originally Posted by Whispers

Simply put.... does Erving of the title.

Please clarify how pointing out this information is disrespect of staff. If this lady was not a mod, this post would not be considered disrespectful by you. Are you saying mods who choose to advertise their services here are not subject to the same criticisms

That is a very slippery slope.

My question is why do you care sir? Irrelevant

Do you not have better things to do? Irrelevant

I know for a fact that all of the gentlemen that have reviewed her are more so active on TER. Relevant

That site is more used in the Western States so maybe they see little to no reason to post here. Relevant

Again why do you care. Irrelevant

Your continued belaboring on this subject borders on disrespect of staff. Exactly how?

I believe it's time you move on sir. Is this a directive?
If so, based upon what? Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Please clarify how pointing out this information is disrespect of staff. If this lady was not a mod, this post would not be considered disrespectful by you. Are you saying mods who choose to advertise their services here are not subject to the same criticisms

That is a very slippery slope. Originally Posted by Boltfan

Preferential treatment, is there such a thing?

Your continued belaboring on this subject borders on disrespect of staff. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Please clarify how pointing out this information is disrespect of staff. Originally Posted by Boltfan

I, too, am puzzled by this.

Simply put.... does Erving of the title. Originally Posted by Still Looking

Oops... sorry for the typo.

"Simply put...deserving of the title on display both in ladies sections and Coed where hobbyists are allowed to post.

Please clarify how pointing out this information is disrespect of staff. If this lady was not a mod, this post would not be considered disrespectful by you. Are you saying mods who choose to advertise their services here are not subject to the same criticisms

That is a very slippery slope. Originally Posted by Boltfan

This isn't the first time this particular whore has been defended by Cryptkicker.... In the ISO section she created an endorsement thread that Cryptkicker went on a rampage to protect when it was questioned a few years ago.

maybe in this case crypt has to get his freebies from another MOD instead of the normal source....

I'm not sure of current temperature of owners and admins attitudes are these days but there was a time when staff was expected to always remain respectful of members when interacting with them...... This guy tried to bully people a bit too much and because he MODs areas with less participation very few challenged him....

My question is why do you care sir? Do you not have better things to do? I know for a fact that all of the gentlemen that have reviewed her are more so active on XXXXX. That site is more used in the Western States so maybe they see little to no reason to post here. Again why do you care. Your continued belaboring on this subject borders on disrespect of staff. I believe it's time you move on sir. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Isn't there some sort of guideline/policy about promoting other sites on ECCIE? Why would a staffmember want to send guys in search of a more active site?

Let's be respectful now...this is a female MOD.

Originally Posted by Still Looking

I had questions about her posting with the MOD title insinuating by the tone of her posts that she actually had some position in staff that mattered to guys posting in their sections or CoEd sections....

I have a couple of other questions for clarification......

..... I'll simplify it for you. I'm a moderator here; as such, I do not troll but I comment when I feel it's warranted. I want Vegas ladies to be fully aware of what guys posting ISO's here are about, hence the need for clarification. You don't like it? Too fucking bad. The End Originally Posted by VIPRaniLane

She states she is a moderator "here"...... Where is "here"? Her name is not listed at the top of the forum as one of the staff members....

In two instances an actual listed Moderator here slights her in NOT including her in his references to the staff "here"....

...... Ladies will need to PM one of the mods or VIPRaniLane the info and we will add it to the thread. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

Ladies- please send your info to one of the mods or to VIPRaniLane and we will add it to this thread. Sorry for the inconvenience. Originally Posted by CryptKicker

In each case it is "one of the mods OR VIPRaniLane"

The or is rather obvious in each case.

She states she is a Moderator HERE and Cryptkeeper seems to exclude her from that group.

It is confusing... Originally Posted by Whispers

1. No
2. Also no
3. Im not a guy, so no answer, lol
4. Because she is mature enough to not get roped into childsplay. To answer here would help no one as the questions are completely irrelevant to anybody else's hobby experiences.
5. See #4

Extra extra EXTRA credit: it's THINK, not think. :-) Originally Posted by VegasJen

Actually he's correct in that it's thinck. He must have gone to a better school.

On topic, anyone that doesn't think there's something totally fishy about Rani's reviews is either working her angle or clueless.

This isn't the first time this particular whore has been defended by Cryptkicker.... In the ISO section she created an endorsement thread that Cryptkicker went on a rampage to protect when it was questioned a few years ago.

maybe in this case crypt has to get his freebies from another MOD instead of the normal source....

I'm not sure of current temperature of owners and admins attitudes are these days but there was a time when staff was expected to always remain respectful of members when interacting with them...... This guy tried to bully people a bit too much and because he MODs areas with less participation very few challenged him.... Originally Posted by Whispers

So this wouldn't be the first time CrypticcCrasher has teamed up with what I'll refer to as his fellow MOD girlfriend? Boss say it ain't so... Cryptmaster tried to "DEMAND" a coed section of the board be limited to his girlfriend VIPRaniLane to be the Star and NOT allow hobbyists to comment?

Here is the threAD:

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=1...dent+providers

WOW! As Forest Gump might say:

Crooked is as Crooked does