Does the Provider have a responsibility to maintain the Relationship Boundaries? I think so. They are the professional in the relationship after all.
Originally Posted by Whispers
I disagree, they are the pros, but responsibility for ones actions do not stop because you're engaged in a hobby, entertainment or professional endeavor.
Do Both? Is it wrong for a Provider to keep seeing a Client that is getting emotionally involved?
I think it is, in all honesty, because I believe at that point she begins to take advantage of the hold/control she has over the client....
Wrong? Maybe. It would depend on her behavior, if she is leading him on, she does get blamed for being a con. This does not lessen the responsibility of the guy for falling for her and being taken advantage of.
Besides, if we go by your logic that the provider is responsible, we can't make fun of WKs anymore because it's not their fault they're PW.
What advice would you be giving to a guy that has knowingly "fallen" a bit too far into the "experience"
What would you say to a lady that knowingly continued to see a guy that she had no reciprocating feelings for?
Is he just a dumb sap that deserves what gets?
Even if a guy is feeling more than he should for a provider, it is still possible to reign that in and continue. I can hardly blame a provider for not cutting off a regular.
Loneliness drives a percentage of the guys in the hobby..... For some it's just about sex.... but for others.... it's a variety of reasons.....
Indeed.
Your kidding right? a human being is a human being. Hobbiests come from one side, escorts the other. Inevitably feelings can happen...I've dated companions that I have both seen or not seen but know what they do. Makes them no less a genuine person than me, who does the same thing from the other side of it.
no such thing as a whore is a whore any more than a douchebag is a douchebag ... well
Originally Posted by budman33
I think you misread what was said. Whore is a whore is a whore... is offensive and demeaning only if you see prostitution as less than honest. We can call a provider a whore, prostitute, hooker, call girl, escort, or a provider, it does not change what she does. It also does not make any inference on her humanity, just as a John, trick, monger or hobbyist makes no claims on us other than our participation.
The distinction made was in the connotation some seem to put around different labels. Courtesan seems to imply a higher level of professionalism than hooker or whore. Maybe there are more expectations from a provider or courtesan than a hooker or a whore just as I have a higher expectation of a Master Sushi chef than I do from someone who cuts fish.
Do those higher expectations include taking responsibility for another person's feelings and actions? No.
and mcDonalds should stop selling mcGriddles
Originally Posted by budman33
No, but they should stop advertising their salads as "healthy".