Personally , I think if you are stupid enough to go, the government should not ban travel

So if say Liberia has yet another Ebola outbreak, you DON'T think the US government should forbid travel to there?? Even just as a safety measure so you don't catch it and bring it back in?? Originally Posted by garhkal

I think the next Ebola outbreak they should send all Trump voters to.

Look....we let parents decide if they want to vaccinate their kids , even though if enough do not get the vaccination it puts all kids at risk. Think about that dickhead.

So to answer your question....if there is a health risk to others, then I'd say a travel ban is ok. Going to NK is a health risk to yourself.

I think the next Ebola outbreak they should send all Trump voters to.

Look....we let parents decide if they want to vaccinate their kids , even though if enough do not get the vaccination it puts all kids at risk. Think about that dickhead.

So to answer your question....if there is a health risk to others, then I'd say a travel ban is ok. Going to NK is a health risk to yourself. Originally Posted by WTF

Actually, they should send all the Retards that voted for Gary Johnson. Stupid fucks

Look....we let parents decide if they want to vaccinate their kids , even though if enough do not get the vaccination it puts all kids at risk. Think about that dickhead. . Originally Posted by WTF

And in several states those parents who DO refuse to get their kids vaccinated, and it kills some other kid cause are being gone after by the DA's office, for Depraved indifference/Negligent homicide..

What the fuck does that mean?

They are banning some from coming, why not going? Originally Posted by wordup666

They can try all they want, but when I'm coming, NOTHING can stop me!

Will Rodman go back for one last visit?

They can try all they want, but when I'm coming, NOTHING can stop me! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

.

What the fuck does that mean? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

It means what i said. Parents don't wanna get their kids vaccinated, then if anything happens cause THEIR unvaccinated kid caught something, then spread it at school, the PARENTs can be held liable..

I actually agree with that ban.. EITHER THAT or make it where those wanting to go, sign off on NOT asking the US for help if they get their dumb asses thrown in jail.... AND IF THEY break that promise, TOUGH SHIT. Originally Posted by garhkal

I can go with this.

It means what i said. Parents don't wanna get their kids vaccinated, then if anything happens cause THEIR unvaccinated kid caught something, then spread it at school, the PARENTs can be held liable.. Originally Posted by garhkal

I agree with this.

In fact you have parents out there who will not vaccinate their kids for the HPV virus even though if their daughter is get it it can lead to cervical cancer. A simple vaccination they will not do that can keep their children from getting cancer

Wow.. me and WTF see eye to eye on yet another thing.. Miracles will never cease.

I think the next Ebola outbreak they should send all Trump voters to.

Look....we let parents decide if they want to vaccinate their kids , even though if enough do not get the vaccination it puts all kids at risk. Think about that dickhead.

So to answer your question....if there is a health risk to others, then I'd say a travel ban is ok. Going to NK is a health risk to yourself. Originally Posted by WTF

What's in a vaccine that would minimize disease risk?


Jim