Snipped or unsnipped?

There is no medical necessity to get it snipped. The procedure is done because dad has his foreskin snipped so the son also gets it snipped and it goes on and on. The procedure was introduced in America by Kellogg's brothers to prevent men from master bating. Foreskin helps in lubrication and also makes sex feel better for men. In Judaism and Islam they snip it for the same reason.

A friend of mine was unsnipped. It was never a problem for him until he got married and then he began getting tears in his foreskin during sex (I'm assuming due to the more frequent sex he was having as a newlywed). The doctor told him that it was because the foreskin was too tight and that he needed to keep the area lubricated. When that didn't work the doctor recommended that he get circumsized.. He was in his early 30s by then. It wasn't a pleasant experience.

There is no medical necessity to get it snipped. The procedure is done because dad has his foreskin snipped so the son also gets it snipped and it goes on and on. The procedure was introduced in America by Kellogg's brothers to prevent men from master bating. Foreskin helps in lubrication and also makes sex feel better for men. In Judaism and Islam they snip it for the same reason. Originally Posted by nomadguy1900

This is one of the most uneducated and stupid post I've ever read. I hope you are joking.

There was a scene about the Bris in Porky's ..... ..

This is one of the most uneducated and stupid post I've ever read. I hope you are joking. Originally Posted by jerky

Might be referring to something better described by this:

I honestly don't know the best way to address this situation or sugar coat it, so I'm just going to say it. But please do not take it personal or as an offense.

If you are Uncircumcised and unable to pull back your foreskin completely (please see PHIMOSIS) I WILL NOT SEE YOU.
#1 because I don't feel comfortable performing bbbj
#2 is a higher risk of the condom coming off


Only reason why I'm addressing this issue is because I have seen 4-5 guys with this condition and have not being comfortable at all.
What really caught my attention though is that guys with this condition seem to think that is normal to have the head of their penis covered and not able to push back their foreskin, GUYS IS NOT! you should be able to pull back ALL your foreskin back and CLEAN it completely. Unfortunately this is something that should have been treated as a kid, but is still not too late there is treatments other than just circumsition. Please do some research and speak to your doctor.

Again I apologize for not making it sound like rainbows and butterflies, but don't know how else to say it.



http://https://urology.ucsf.edu/patient-care/children/phimosis Originally Posted by N.M.

This is one of the most uneducated and stupid post I've ever read. I hope you are joking. Originally Posted by jerky

https://youtu.be/gCSWbTv3hng

Watch this

https://youtu.be/gCSWbTv3hng

Watch this Originally Posted by nomadguy1900

College Humor? Now THAT'S a definitive resource!

Actually Nomad, I agree with the premise. I just hate College Humor.

Always a sensitive topic as the guys that have been mutilated have to defend it because, what their choice? They can never get a sense of what being normal would feel like.

It does cause the loss of sensitivity and as the tissue that is no longer covered begins to partially keratinize. If this was being done to little girls, the outcry would be off the charts -- wait, it is not allowed on baby girls!

I feel this is more dependent on geographical location, not age.

When I was younger (last teens through my 20s), I really didn't like uncut cock. But that was really only bc in this country, the majority of men are cut, so that is what you get used to.

Then I moved to the UK in 2010. Pretty much everyone in Europe is uncut, (minus Jews and Muslims), so I started to get used to it.

At this point in life, I really do not have a preference. They all look the same once hard anyways.

My only requirement is to keep it clean please, fellas!

Like I said, uneducated. But not surprising from someone who grasp their education via YouTube. How do you explain the circumcisions prior to the Kelloggs Bros?

I'm embarrassed for you.

....
At this point in life, I really do not have a preference. They all look the same once hard anyways. Originally Posted by Victoria of Houston

VoH et al. ...see if you find the surprising non-typo in this quote I pulled from Yahoo

......
There are perfectly reasonable reasons to circumcise your child. Aside from the sanitary benefits, there are aesthetic and cultural motives. I'm not sure where the anti-circumcision gang gets the oft-repeated lie that circumcision ruins a man's penis, making it insensitive and leading to impotence. I have had sex with a great many circumcised men and am circumcised as well. I will say, first hand, that those experiences were loaded with plenty of wonderful sensations ending in the act that best demonstrates the proof that the penis was stimulated.

LMAO....so there you have it folks. Can't argue with that perspective.

https://answers.yahoo.com/question/i...0002448AANMFX1

To my thoughts:

Well one thought I have is that we shouldn't be messin around down there and should just leave things natural. Seems like the obvious thing to me. It was a tough decision the week my son was born.

But the other thought is that the benefits seem good to me and I've been AOK with my unchosen and permanent situation. I remember the days of past when the team or class showered together and one couldn't help but notice some weird lookin' wieners and (as a left brain guy) woundering how much pee got trapped in there after a good piss.

Now, those others with the uncut version were probably thinckin the same thing about those of us that were hoodless. But who knows. No two were the same anyway.

WALDT and often when I see a porn clip with some dude sporting what I thinck is an abnormal amount of extra skin, I appreciate my version even more. Some of the porn blow jobs just get too weird. Scenes of penetration/stroking look weird because the guy's dick is going in/out but the skin isn't changing position relative to that pussy. Seems like cut and tight provides more friction and sensation.

I dunno....but like that dude said in the quote in the above post. The fun outcum is obvious.

The moment I lost my virginity, I busted a nut in just a few strokes even wearing a thick condom and I had already cum once in her mouth. I changed condoms and busted again pretty quick. Then jacked off for a 4th nut after she left my house. These claims of desensitizing are BBS. (bare bull shit)

Oh yeah, I too can jack off without lube....and jr always sports that lily white supple skin and the flesh-pinck turtle-neck. So far, it's done me AOK.

(edit: but I did learn long ago, not to let a Latin American girl stroke me without some lube. They don't see enough cut guys to understand the difference.)

Wife and I don't want kids. However if we did, it'd be snipped. Unsnipped is ugly. Snipped here.