Animal Ears & Noses

I assume they’re way younger and immature for my tastes. I’m not sure if the animal ears and such or the stupid picture words from mainly BP level providers are more irritating.

Thins the field. You can pass on that one instantly. Just like the oNeS WuTH fUCkeD uP TypE. Not in a million years if theirs was the last pussy on earth.

the ladies with the ears better be prepared to fuck like a Jack Rabbit.

the ladies with the ears better be prepared to fuck like a Jack Rabbit. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

This.

But on a serious note. There are a lot of Professional buyers of pussy and professional sellers of pussy since George Bush Senior was in office.

It's 2017. Those who were 9 years old in the year 2000, are out here buying pussy now, and this is nothing abnormal to them. It's just a Snapchat feature.

So, as to not offend anybody, let me say this in a less crass manner: there is a new generation of guys and gals entering this world born in the late 80's and even late 90's.

This.

But on a serious note. There are a lot of Professional buyers of pussy and professional sellers of pussy since George Bush Senior was in office.

It's 2017. Those who were 9 years old in the year 2000, are out here buying pussy now, and this is nothing abnormal to them. It's just a Snapchat feature.

So, as to not offend anybody, let me say this in a less crass manner: there is a new generation of guys and gals entering this world born in the late 80's and even late 90's. Originally Posted by Eva Damita

I agree.

Additionally, why get your panties in a wad over a simple filter? Have a sense of humor! You could be missing out on the time of your life.

The question any provider needs to ask herself about photos, indeed, about every element of her ad, is, "Will this bring me more business?"" If the answer is, "no," or, more critically, if the element actually results in less business, she shouldn't do it. I can't see how adding animal ears and noses to photos results in a greater proportion of the potential clients who view the ad calling and making appointments. It may be cute, and it may be generational, but the bottom line is, "Is it effective?"

I don't like it if all of the pics have filters, but I think some of them are cute.

Seduction is what mature providers are skilled at.....leave the silly lil girls alone and go with a real woman..like LustyBusty and the ladies who posted here..lol

Seduction is what mature providers are skilled at.....leave the silly lil girls alone and go with a real woman..like LustyBusty and the ladies who posted here..lol Originally Posted by DallasRain

Amen to that!

When I was younger with a cheerleader body I had a different type of client... the kind that wanted me to dress up like a school girl and call them daddy/ uncle/ coach, etc. I feel that those clients will be drawn to ads and showcases with a sprinkling of cutsie filters.

Now that I'm more mature I attract men with my skills and outright naughtiness, but I know those other guys are still out there hobbying, looking for the youngest, cutsiest, closest thing to youth they can find.

The question any provider needs to ask herself about photos, indeed, about every element of her ad, is, "Will this bring me more business?"" If the answer is, "no," or, more critically, if the element actually results in less business, she shouldn't do it. I can't see how adding animal ears and noses to photos results in a greater proportion of the potential clients who view the ad calling and making appointments. It may be cute, and it may be generational, but the bottom line is, "Is it effective?" Originally Posted by Sir Lancehernot

It's effective to an audience that logs on to social media more than whore boards.