-No AA's PLEASE-

ditto to mokoas post

Why do people feel the need to post or even justify this lightning rod shiznit? Politely decline or say you are booked up ... Geezus fuckin louweeze! Nothing to see people, please move along ....

The providers are legal contractors that provide a service and is recognized by law as a business. That is why this site is allowed to exist. Technically a provider can be sued for discrimination:

The Federal Civil Rights Act guarantees all people the right to "full and equal enjoyment of the goods, SERVICES, facilities, privileges, advantages, and accommodations of any place of public accommodation, without discrimination or segregation on the ground of race, color, religion, or national origin."

Now whether or not its advisable to sue, is a consideration the claimant should understand could be ill-advised since the social repercussion may be undesirable.

The man that was referred to earlier in Vegas wanted to sue the escort because he was not satisfied with the service and consequently was advised by LVPD that it was a civil issue and to contact the Better Business Bureau. He did file suit in NY but I don't remember what was resolved, probably nothing I suspect.

in nv its legal however, so i could see filing suit.
....i did see some guy on one of the judge shows, try to sue another guy, bc the pharmecueticals he purchased werent up to par.
yes, you guessed it---the case was dismissed.

in nv its legal however, so i could see filing suit.
....i did see some guy on one of the judge shows, try to sue another guy, bc the pharmecueticals he purchased werent up to par.
yes, you guessed it---the case was dismissed. Originally Posted by MsPrittiKitti

If I could ask a question of you, as a provider, you at this point are a legal business correct? I'm going to assume that you are gonna say yes so check this scenario and give me your opinion ok?

Lets say that an individual contacts you and follows all legal parameters as far as the initial contact is concerned, and you sense that he is black, now remember you have not seen him and this just the initial call, and then you tell him you don't see black men so he gets upset and hangs up. Do you think that under the law in the way that I describe it above he could then file suit for racism? I would think so because what has transpired so far is not illegal and is recognized as a legitiment service and therefore would fall under the Federal Civil Rights Act. You've got the experience and I'm just postulating somewhat so your thoughts?

YoYoma... I agree. But, I feel its a method for more exposure(advertisement) and to please a few. I feel we all have our likes and so on.... so, there is no problem here. I was an athlete, I know some asians, I'm still and alcoholic and african... oh, I do have references

What hogwash! To even think the law would compel a lady to have sex with any and all just because she is an escort...beyond rediculous. Every lady in the world discriminates in one way or another. No references, references I don't like, too young, too old, ethnicity, gut feeling, voice on phone...on and on. Is there a lady anywhere who has never said "NO"? I believe the young lady has posted her preference.

These threads are like broken records....

My advice in the future to the ladies that feel a need to start a thread to make it known who they choose not to see either for age or race or whatever.. is to make the statement and then ask the thread be closed. Then keeping it posted in their showcases....done.

Then keeping it posted in their showcases....done. Originally Posted by canyonman

Agreed if I see they say no AA don't even bother would rather have someone that pretends to enjoy my company..

So again just put in showcase or at least make it part of screening. Been turned away at door no fun.

I'd be a little hurt and offended if a lady's ad said 'no big boned, fuzzy, middle aged gingers', but would get over it. It's sad that anybody feels the need to so blanketly discriminate over something as meaningless as race, but there seems to be no permenant cure for ignorance, and in the end this is a "seller's market" and the ladies should be free to set any restrictions, limitations, and preferences on their service that they feel necessary to be comfortable. In solidarity though, this cracka wouldn't have anything to do with anyone that I knew to be racist because I generally prefer intelligent and sweet natured ladies.

These threads about race are booooorrrrrriiiinnnngggggggggg snore!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Totally agree **Karla**

Does anyone ever read the information at the bottom of the screens; albeit in part

".....All contents within, including discussions and reviews, are fictional and for your amusement only...."

In lawsuits, plaintiffs tend to go for the deepest pockets.
Guess what??
There are no pockets..

great post rod!!
i try to look at things from both sides
which ive got to stop defending those. lol
i should let them justify their reasons)

i would assume the guy must have clean hands if seriously trying to file suit. if he doesnt, o well-i guess
furthermore, what does he expect to happen/the outcome to be??
i think the consequences are far greater than the reward.

equality for humankind in "this" industry?
(sorry, but i doubt theyre passing out noble peace prizes for that one)
a monetary pay out???
(good luck!! ppl always talk about how us ladies have poor money management skills. we dont know the value of a dollar bc we can easily get it, and thats why there are "end of the month specials". i guess having a judgement on a lady, will be no different than all the other bill collectors she has)

i agree to disagree on this topic!!!

I'd be a little hurt and offended if a lady's ad said 'no big boned, fuzzy, middle aged gingers', but would get over it. It's sad that anybody feels the need to so blanketly discriminate over something as meaningless as race, but there seems to be no permenant cure for ignorance, and in the end this is a "seller's market" and the ladies should be free to set any restrictions, limitations, and preferences on their service that they feel necessary to be comfortable. In solidarity though, this cracka wouldn't have anything to do with anyone that I knew to be racist because I generally prefer intelligent and sweet natured ladies. Originally Posted by PaganGuy

Really? If the providers were able to track every guy who looked at their ad, should they be hurt and offended that each and every one did not call her? If say you look at an African American providers ad and don't set up an appointment after you realize that she is African American are you then a racist? What if they are Latino, Asian, European, to heavy, to skinny, to short, to tall, a blonde, a redhead (YUM), a brunette, breasts to big or to small, aren't you then discriminating against them? No it's called a PREFERENCE!

The difference is that you and I and I can make our choices privately. This lady and others do it publicly so as not to waste anyone's time and I applaud them for it. There are lady's that post that they don't see older guys and I just move on. There is no way I would want an intimate encounter with someone was repulsed by me or scared that something bad may happen. Kind of a mood killer IMHO.

Calling someone ignorant is pretty asinine considering you don't know that they are racist. The lady that posted this said she had a bad experience with an AA man and seems concerned that it would happen again. I don't know what happened and neither do you, but it was enough to make her establish this policy and that should be good enough for anyone.

Long live freedom of choice!

@darter stereotyping is quicker but hurtful. paganguy could be stereotypin by labeling ppl as ignorant.

opinions = assholes / everyones got them

either way, i don't understand the whining if a provider doesn't not clearly state preference. as long as there's some professionalism about the matter y quibble if she does refuse service.