Plus you present opinion as fact.
I love to hear you squeal.
I posted where all my numbers came from. You didn't say a single thing to shoot my post down. I even included links to all my numbers came from. Isn't it stupid to use 7 year old data when there is recent data? Sure it is.
I even included a definition of voter rolls. It's registered voters that have been vetted. Vetted to get on which doesn't mean the status is correct of course.
2 points here.
The rolls need to be purged. I said that.
The second point is National Review says:
some 3.5 million more people are registered to vote in the U.S. than are alive among America’s adult citizens. Such staggering inaccuracy is an engraved invitation to voter fraud.
Did you catch that douce-bag? Nationally there might be 3.5 million.
Read more at: http://www.nationalreview.com/articl...t-462-counties
You're a stupid imbicile, masterdickmuncher.I'm not going to argue with you. You're too stupid to look at the actual votes cast (@3.4 million total) by @6 million registered voters. You believe a un-named LA county official told JW they were a "whopping 144%" over.
Gerry was a dim-retard, masterdickmuncher.
Just like Jefferson and Madison. Only a douche-bag like you wouldn't be proud to be in the same group as those two.
Furthermore, masterdickmuncher, the population of Los Angeles County is 9.8 million per the last census in 2010.
Fuck 2010, bitch. Why not use 2000?
For the same reason. There is data from 2016.
If one subtracts those below the age of 18, which is about 24.5% of the 9.8 million, that leaves us with about 7,399,00 of voting age, masterdickmuncher.
Now, here's where your correction bites you in your butt, masterdickmuncher.
No douche-bag. This is where your whole response collapses. Judicial Watch provides no sources.
And answer one simple question.
How can they be legitimate and say nothing negative about trump?
Judicial Watch reported that the number of voters on the L.A. County's voter rolls was "144% of the total number of resident citizens of voting age", which we have determined to now be 7,399,000, masterdickmuncher.
We? You have a tranny in your pocket? You don't know if jw is using 2010 numbers or July 2016 numbers.
Judicial Watch has provided no information on how they reached their conclusion.
California Secretary of State Alex Padilla is rebutting allegations by a Washington, D.C., group that 11 California counties, including San Diego County, have more registered voters than adults eligible to vote.
Padilla is calling the claim “baseless” even as the organization, Judicial Watch, threatens to sue the state if it does not adjust its voter records. Judicial Watch did not offer any data to back up its claim, and it declined to give the Los Angeles Times any details about its analysis, saying it may soon sue.http://www.sandiegouniontribune.com/opinion/the-conversation/sd-california-more-voters-than-eligible-adults-claim-20170809-htmlstory.html
That means the Los Angeles County voter rolls, per Judicial Watch's report, are listing about 10,654,560 voters when they should only have about 7,399,000 on the rolls, masterdickmuncher.
I gave you a link douche-bag. They are claiming almost 5 million current registered voters
That means there are about 3,255,560 too many voters on the rolls in Los Angeles County alone, masterdickmuncher.
That's about 400,000 more votes -- in a single dim-retard California county -- than the 2.86 million vote margin in the popular vote that Assup and other hildebeest minions keep crying about, masterdickmuncher.
You're a stupid imbecile, masterdickmuncher. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
I provided links to all my information. You provided a link to outdated population data (2010 pop. listed as 9.8 million while LA county shows 10.1 as of July 2016, and an under 18 pop. in 2010 24.5% while LA county says 22.2% in July 2016. Typical you-are-a-tranny-fucker move to try and use a lower number and higher percentage to make your fake numbers look better) and an opinion article
You base all your "calculations" on 7-year-old population data and the word of an organization that doesn't offer any data to back it's claims and refused to give any details of its analysis.
Another big clue is jw saying 144%. Without even referencing any population figures.
The best part of this whole thing is you can't remove that total bullshit from your signature without admitting I'm right. And you only have an opinion piece debunked by themselves because they won't release details or data.
If you leave it you're stupid and if you removed it you caved.
Again, no point in arguing with you.
When you can refute the LA county numbers, I won't hear it from you because you're on ignore.
Nope, if those numbers are refuted it will be in the real news somewhere.
Now fuck off.
