SCOTUS upholds Trump's travel ban !

The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin
You don't even know what Obstruction of Justice or Money Laundering is.


Jim



What “is” they, you fucking RETARD? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

i don't know, assup. let's ask a disbarred Arkysar lawyer. bahhaaaaaa




Howdy u poor black folk! What can us progressive dems give u for a vote today?

want's u so more gov freebies? that ... might be a problem ... ijs ..





bahahahaaaaaa
upheld it in full.

who will be the first of the usual suspects here to yell RACISM? bahhaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
Supposedly only Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor said they would have denied the government’s request
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
only ruthie & sonia voted no to the trump travel ban.

decision was unanimous at 7-2.
Die Ruth Bader, die! ..... unfortunately, according to her wiki page, she's survived bouts with both colon and pancreatic cancer ..... and she did have a stent placed in her right coronary artery ..... but get this, "since 1999 a former Army reservist attached to the Special Forces has trained Ginsburg twice weekly in the justices-only gym at the Supreme Court" ..... dammitt that bitch just might live forever ..... hopefully Trump replaces her and another Supreme Court justice or two in the next 7 years .....
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Die Ruth Bader, die! ..... unfortunately, according to her wiki page, she's survived bouts with both colon and pancreatic cancer ..... and she did have a stent placed in her right coronary artery ..... but get this, "since 1999 a former Army reservist attached to the Special Forces has trained Ginsburg twice weekly in the justices-only gym at the Supreme Court" ..... dammitt that bitch just might live forever ..... hopefully Trump replaces her and another Supreme Court justice or two in the next 7 years ..... Originally Posted by 00 gauge
just concentrate on sotomayer... shes like Scalia on health.
Fingers crossed dilbert ..... might even have to get religion and start praying, too ..... Trump's term is critical for reshaping the Supreme Court .....
LexusLover's Avatar
No they did not uphold Trumps travel ban, ..... Originally Posted by StandinStraight
.. yes they did on a temporary basis until the other cases arrive.

The decision by the Court is based on whether it is more likely that the ban will be upheld when they get the other cases sometime this next year and have an opportunity to review and decide them.

Like HillariousNoMore and her other supporters who are butthurt because she didn't win last year you take a win a try to make it look like a loss ... just like you trying to claim the "conservatives" doubled the national debt during Obaminable's years in office. You just make yourself look dumber than you are.

Even your own ClintonNoNews media mouthpiece disagrees with you!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...ban/index.html

Supreme Court lets full Trump travel ban take effect
FYI: The original travel ban was rewritten as a tactic to avoid the immediate effects of the UNLAWFUL order issued by the goofballs in the 9th Circuit, which has the worse reversal rate of any Federal Appeals Court in the U.S. So now it doesn't matter if the terrorists do have family, friends, or jobs here in the country, they can still be prohibited from coming.

You all will have to figure out another way to illegally win the 2020 election rather than pack the voting booths with terrorists and illegal aliens. And these guys will have to get back to work intimidating people who realize Trump is good for this country:

LexusLover's Avatar
.. yes they did on a temporary basis until the other cases arrive.

The decision by the Court is based on whether it is more likely that the ban will be upheld when they get the other cases sometime this next year and have an opportunity to review and decide them.

Like HillariousNoMore and her other supporters who are butthurt because she didn't win last year you take a win a try to make it look like a loss ... just like you trying to claim the "conservatives" doubled the national debt during Obaminable's years in office. You just make yourself look dumber than you are.

Even your own ClintonNoNews media mouthpiece disagrees with you!

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/04/politi...ban/index.html



FYI: The original travel ban was rewritten as a tactic to avoid the immediate effects of the UNLAWFUL order issued by the goofballs in the 9th Circuit, which has the worse reversal rate of any Federal Appeals Court in the U.S. So now it doesn't matter if the terrorists do have family, friends, or jobs here in the country, they can still be prohibited from coming.

You all will have to figure out another way to illegally win the 2020 election rather than pack the voting booths with terrorists and illegal aliens. And these guys will have to get back to work intimidating people who realize Trump is good for this country:

Originally Posted by LexusLover
To emphasis what an ignorant dumbshit you, StandInShit, are here is the Order of the SCOTUS with respect to the 9th circuit bullshit ... if you don't know what "mooted" is .. then look it up ....

ORDER OF SEPTEMBER 25, 2017:
THE PARTIES ARE DIRECTED TO FILE LETTER BRIEFS ADDRESSING WHETHER, OR TO WHAT EXTENT, THE PROCLAMATION ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER 24, 2017, MAY RENDER CASES NO. 16-1436 AND 16-1540 MOOT. THE PARTIES SHOULD ALSO ADDRESS WHETHER, OR TO WHAT EXTENT, THE SCHEDULED EXPIRATION OF SECTIONS 6(a) AND 6(b) OF EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13780 MAY RENDER THOSE ASPECTS OF CASE NO. 16-1540 MOOT. THE BRIEFS, LIMITED TO 10 PAGES, ARE TO BE FILED SIMULTANEOUSLY WITH THE CLERK AND SERVED UPON OPPOSING COUNSEL ON OR BEFORE NOON, THURSDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2017. THE CASES ARE REMOVED FROM THE ORAL ARGUMENT CALENDAR, PENDING FURTHER ORDER OF THE COURT.

ORDER OF OCTOBER 24, 2017

. . . THE JUDGMENT IS THEREFORE VACATED, AND THE CASE IS REMANDED TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT WITH INSTRUCTIONS TO DISMISS AS MOOT THE CHALLENGE TO EXECUTIVE ORDER NO. 13,780.
https://www.supremecourt.gov/qp/16-01540qp.pdf

And here is the most recent Order of 04Dec17:

https://www.supremecourt.gov/orders/...417zr_4gd5.pdf

(ORDER LIST: 583 U.S.) MONDAY, DECEMBER 4, 2017

ORDER IN PENDING CASE

17A550: TRUMP, PRESIDENT, ET AL. V. HAWAII, ET AL.

The application for a stay presented to Justice Kennedy and by him referred to the Court is granted, and the District Court’s October 20, 2017 order granting a preliminary injunction is stayed pending disposition of the Government’s appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and disposition of the Government’s petition for a writ of certiorari, if such writ is sought. If a writ of certiorari is sought and the Court denies the petition, this order shall terminate automatically. If the Court grants the petition for a writ of certiorari, this order shall terminate when the Court enters its judgment.
In light of its decision to consider the case on an expedited basis, we expect that the Court of Appeals will render its decision with appropriate dispatch.

Justice Ginsburg and Justice Sotomayor would deny the application.
What “is” they, you fucking RETARD? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Slick willy, is that YOU ? Asking AGAIN what the definition of " IS " is ????
LexusLover's Avatar
Slick willy, is that YOU ? Originally Posted by Rey Lengua
Hardly.

Slick doesn't have to ask for ....

Yssup Rider's Avatar
So this is a win?

You guys are spewin a lot of hate today ... especially our DOTY.

How many times have you posted that picture, LLiarMan? Might be Number Two on your list, right behind Obama’s golf outrage.

BTW — that golf outrage still working for you now?

Fucking hypocritical LIAR.
LexusLover's Avatar
AssUp! Just for you!

Yssup Rider's Avatar
Great answer, LLiarMan.

We all know about YOUR relationship with women.

LMAO!

Keep practicing your 5 Ds of Dipshittery. After all, it's your crown now.

CONGRATULATIONS!
LexusLover's Avatar
AssUp! Just for you!

Originally Posted by LexusLover
It should say "Dope"! Just for you!
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Hardly.

Slick doesn't have to ask for ....

Originally Posted by LexusLover



<private message - subscribe for premium access to view>