Another example rising sea levels causing disaster.

LexusLover's Avatar
Run to the king for something else. Originally Posted by bamscram
I don't need to "run to the king" for anything. Shit's already hit the Earth ... volcanoes have blown ... earthquakes ... nuclear explosions .... and now we have the North Koreans wanting to lob shit ...

... are you fretting about a rise in the sea level in Europe?

You didn't study much geology did you? Or did you study anything?

And there are sharks along Galveston Beach!
bamscram's Avatar
I don't need to "run to the king" for anything. Shit's already hit the Earth ... volcanoes have blown ... earthquakes ... nuclear explosions .... and now we have the North Koreans wanting to lob shit ...

... are you fretting about a rise in the sea level in Europe?

You didn't study much geology did you? Or did you study anything?

And there are sharks along Galveston Beach! Originally Posted by LexusLover
The only thing you excel at is making shit up.
Provide a link where I am fretting. Oh right, there isn't one.

Keep whining about objects hitting the ocean.
LexusLover's Avatar
The only thing you excel at is making shit up. Originally Posted by bamscram
You're the real "thing"!

The only "make up" you wear was last night!

Do you really need a link to remember? You fret daily!

Your buddy StandkInShit is worrying about water rising. Not me!
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
If climate change( normal warming or cooling) is occurring why deny it? Originally Posted by bamscram
no one's denying it (the natural part). only the anthropogenic claim part is.
bamscram's Avatar
Who's "denying it"?

Here's an artist's rendering of an object now being "watched"!



It has entered our solar system.

It's estimated to be 1/4 mile long. If it hits Earth .... will there be a "change" in the "climate"? Will there be a rise in the water if it hits water?

Does it have a friggin' thing to do with "fossil fuel"? Originally Posted by LexusLover
You're the real "thing"!

The only "make up" you wear was last night!

Do you really need a link to remember? You fret daily!

Your buddy StandkInShit is worrying about water rising. Not me! Originally Posted by LexusLover
See above post then STFU.
bamscram's Avatar
no one's denying it (the natural part). only the anthropogenic claim part is. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
the_real_Barleycorn's Avatar
If climate change( normal warming or cooling) is occurring why deny it? Originally Posted by bamscram
If you have a conversation instead of shouting insults you'd notice that no one is really denying that climate changes. It's that man made part, the end of times, the chicken little analogy that reasonable people doubt.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wor...iscovery-video

This was a disaster. Rising sea levels completely submerge a town in the Mediterranean. Fossil fuel will lead to the demise of our coastal cities, just like this example. This city was 2 miles from the shore line. New York City and Boston abut the shoreline, and are in peril.

OK, maybe not. However, It is fundamentally the same argument being proffered by the fascist promoting the leftist agenda.

Kehaar Originally Posted by kehaar


you imbecile, you know that article doesn't say one damn word about climate change yeah? and not one word about that being the reason this ancient city is underwater.

according to the article, an earth quake caused this 1,400 years ago. So Einstein what was humanity's impact om the climate 1,400 years ago?

let me give you a hint .. ZERO

bahahaaaaaa
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
no one's denying it (the natural part). only the anthropogenic claim part is. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
Originally Posted by bamscram
there's nothing funny about it.
LexusLover's Avatar
See above post then STFU. Originally Posted by bamscram
You should probably SHUT THE FUCK UP! But you, as a parrot, don't know any better.

If you couldn't make up shit, you'd have nothing to post.

Your predator friend Bill Clinton has trouble with "is" and ...

.. you have trouble with "if"!

If it hits Earth .... will there be a "change" in the "climate"?
LexusLover's Avatar
I don't need to "run to the king" for anything. Shit's already hit the Earth ... volcanoes have blown ... earthquakes ... nuclear explosions .... and now we have the North Koreans wanting to lob shit ...

... are you fretting about a rise in the sea level in Europe?

You didn't study much geology did you? Or did you study anything?
Originally Posted by LexusLover
This is not a real photograph! (For the stupid ones on here!)



That would "probably" raise the sea level at least for a bit.

And it would "probably" change the climate at least for a bit!
https://www.dailystar.co.uk/news/wor...iscovery-video

This was a disaster. Rising sea levels completely submerge a town in the Mediterranean. Fossil fuel will lead to the demise of our coastal cities, just like this example. This city was 2 miles from the shore line. New York City and Boston abut the shoreline, and are in peril.

OK, maybe not. However, It is fundamentally the same argument being proffered by the fascist promoting the leftist agenda.

Kehaar Originally Posted by kehaar
All of Nature is an ebb of flow aka cyclical from a woman's monthly cycle, night and day, birds flying north and south, turtles nesting high tide low tide etc etc. Man needs to quite thinking he is smarter than Nature, he's not, we are part of "the web", we did not build "the web".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geolog...erature_record
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-18-2017, 08:40 AM
Why do you think we need a EPA Super Fund ?

Is it because companies are so responsible and clean up their messes? They never pollute the environment? Is that wtf you numbnuts think?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfund

Approximately 70% of Superfund cleanup activities historically have been paid for by parties responsible (PRPs) for the cleanup of contamination. The exceptions occur when the responsible party either cannot be found or is unable to pay for the cleanup. Until the mid-1990s, most of the funding came from a tax on the petroleum and chemical industries, reflecting the polluter pays principle, but since 2001, most of the funding for cleanups of hazardous waste sites has come from taxpayers
bamscram's Avatar
You should probably SHUT THE FUCK UP! But you, as a parrot, don't know any better.

If you couldn't make up shit, you'd have nothing to post.

Your predator friend Bill Clinton has trouble with "is" and ...

.. you have trouble with "if"! Originally Posted by LexusLover
bamscram's Avatar
If you have a conversation instead of shouting insults you'd notice that no one is really denying that climate changes. It's that man made part, the end of times, the chicken little analogy that reasonable people doubt. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn
https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...climate+change

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...climate+change

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...climate+change

https://www.eccie.net/showthread.php...climate+change