For the lib-retard jackasses worshiping at Wolff's alter of lies and deception:

What a fucking joke. The MSM will treat it as gospel. Originally Posted by bambino
There is actually two books written on the same subject same title just different authors. One is written by Michael Wolff the other is written by Michelle Lewinsky. They are both trash with no truth or substance.


Jim
I am proud to have trump as president.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
There is actually two books written on the same subject same title just different authors. One is written by Michael Wolff the other is written by Michelle Lewinsky. They are both trash with no truth or substance.


Jim
Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

googled: fire & fury lewinsky

amazon had links to it. its not on amazon. looks like that version of the book was delisted.

I have to wonder about this.. why did wolff's book catch fire and lewinsky's book didn't. could it have something do with who they know in the network?
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Bogus.

Like you, Bone Collector.

Keep that motor running, boy!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 01-07-2018, 09:09 AM
What a fucking joke. The MSM will treat it as gospel. Originally Posted by bambino
But this guys books and docfilms weren't?





I B Hankering's Avatar
But this guys books and docfilms weren't?
Originally Posted by WTF
Seriously though, did any major network lift text and quote passage after passage from D'Souza's book as "factual news" the way ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC are presenting Wolff's book as "factual news" without mentioning Wolff's own disclaimer? Friday night, ABC's David Muir lead story was passage after passage from Wolff's book as if everything presented was bona fide fact ... when it's actually certified bullshit.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 01-07-2018, 09:32 AM
Seriously though, did any major network lift text and quote passage after passage from D'Souza's book (yes FoxNews) as "factual news" the way ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN and MSNBC are presenting Wolff's book as "factual news" without mentioning Wolff's own disclaimer? Friday night, ABC's David Muir lead story was passage after passage from Wolff's book as if everything presented was bona fide fact ... when it's actually certified bullshit. Originally Posted by I B Hankering
CNN, Fox, MSNBC are businesses. They play to their base to make money.

Talk Radio plays to their base and it is dominated by conservatives.

If you'd like to make an argument that there needs to be more Conservative networks and more liberal talk radio hosts....you'd have a point.

My point is that both this book and D'souzs's books are fiction meant to make their author money with callous disregard for the truth.

Trump is not losing his mind. He has always been exactly like he is now. Personally I think that type personality bad for the country but the book is incorrect to try and lead folks to believe that Trump is losing his mind. He is, who he always has been. Someone who cares more about himself and his image than any other thing, including this country.

And during the early GOP primary , many of you knew this fact. Now you seem to think Trump actually cares about this country.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
If they were alive today you would be calling them fake news, Irritable Bowel Hanky.

That’s the entire point.

You bought into the Turd Reich Bullshit Machine. Now you’re waist deep in it.

Time to join a 12-goose step program, Irritable Bowel Hanky!
I B Hankering's Avatar
Go fuck yourself in your lib-retarded ass, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.





CNN, Fox, MSNBC are businesses. They play to their base to make money.

Talk Radio plays to their base and it is dominated by conservatives.

If you'd like to make an argument that there needs to be more Conservative networks and more liberal talk radio hosts....you'd have a point.

My point is that both this book and D'souzs's books are fiction meant to make their author money with callous disregard for the truth.

Trump is not losing his mind. He has always been exactly like he is now. Personally I think that type personality bad for the country but the book is incorrect to try and lead folks to believe that Trump is losing his mind. He is, who he always has been. Someone who cares more about himself and his image than any other thing, including this country.

And during the early GOP primary , many of you knew this fact. Now you seem to think Trump actually cares about this country. Originally Posted by WTF

My point is that real news journalists, like Walter Cronkite and Eric Sevareid, would never, ever have aired Wolff's shit as legitimate "news".
lustylad's Avatar
My point is that both this book and D'souza's books are fiction meant to make their author money with callous disregard for the truth. Originally Posted by WTF
False equivalence. You didn't read D'Souza's latest book, any more than you read Nassim Taleb's The Black Swan. You're a liar and a phony name-dropping poseur. Give me specific examples where D'Souza showed "callous disregard for the truth" or else STFU.

Of course, dim-retards hate to be reminded of the truth!


Dinesh D'Souza ✔ @DineshDSouza

WHEN THE KLAN HAD POWER: In the 1920s the KKK marched 50,000 men in hoods down 5th Ave in NY--they were headed to the Dem Nat'l Convention

WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 01-07-2018, 11:49 AM
False equivalence. You didn't read D'Souza's latest book, any more than you read Nassim Taleb's The Black Swan. You're a liar and a phony name-dropping poseur. Give me specific examples where D'Souza showed "callous disregard for the truth" or else STFU.

Of course, dim-retards hate to be reminded of the truth!
Originally Posted by lustylad
False equivalence??? Worse than reading his book, I saw his movies!

I read Nassim Taleb's The Black Swan when it first came out dicklicker. You act as if that is some hard book.

So you are correct about me not reading D'Souza's latest book. Incorrect about Taleb's book.

Did you see those two crap movies?






Dinesh D'Souza ✔ @DineshDSouza

WHEN THE KLAN HAD POWER: In the 1920s the KKK marched 50,000 men in hoods down 5th Ave in NY--they were headed to the Dem Nat'l Convention

Originally Posted by lustylad
Yes the Klan was affiliated with the Democrats right up until LBJ signed the Civil Rights Legislation. They then migrated to the GOP where they have been since.

So a portrayal such as the above only works on ignorant racist fucks trying to deny their current racial bias by trying to confuse it with their distant past.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 01-07-2018, 11:56 AM

My point is that real news journalists, like Walter Cronkite and Eric Sevareid, would never, ever have aired Wolff's shit as legitimate "news". Originally Posted by I B Hankering
You are correct but I think that you are not taking into account that News has become a business much more so than in the Golden Age of TV when there were only three networks. They did not look at their bottom line like they now do.

Trump puts out more Fake News than all the networks combined including Fox!

It is really a shame.

Most viewers do not have time to really try and figure out what is real and what is truly fake.

So they turn on what they want to hear and either talk radio or Fox News or CNN give it to them.

That is why imho we have a nation full of political idiots....maybe 20% of voting nations knows how to sift through all the bullshit.



.
dilbert firestorm's Avatar
Yes the Klan was affiliated with the Democrats right up until LBJ signed the Civil Rights Legislation. They then migrated to the GOP where they have been since. Originally Posted by WTF
that part is myth. there were a lot of democrats who stayed. only a few actually left for the republican party. most of the segregationist got primaried out. I don't think we have any ex-segregationist in congress now.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 01-07-2018, 03:37 PM
that part is myth. there were a lot of democrats who stayed. only a few actually left for the republican party. most of the segregationist got primaried out. I don't think we have any ex-segregationist in congress now. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
It was a slow migration but a migration none the less.

Progressive were the majority make up of the GOP before 1964 and now that political slant is associated with Democrats.

LexusLover is a perfect example. He is from the old southern families who believed segregation was equality! He still fancies himself a Democrat!







.
lustylad's Avatar
False equivalence??? Worse than reading his book, I saw his movies!

Another lie! The book you cited above - "The Big Lie" - hasn't even been made into a movie yet.


Yes the Klan was affiliated with the Democrats right up until LBJ signed the Civil Rights Legislation. They then migrated to the GOP where they have been since.

Hahahaha... the myth of the BIG SWITCH, right? Unfortunately for you, Dinesh already exposed that self-serving dimotard myth intended to cover up the party's long and deep racist history!
Originally Posted by WTF
By the way, snitchfuck, you would have to look long and hard to find even 5-10,000 klan members left in the USA. They didn't "migrate"... they died out... as dimotards!

Let's run the tape one more time, for snitchy... start @ 32:30 to see where Dinesh debunks the myth of the BIG SWITCH:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-SStdawtYFA