The list goes on and fucking on.... Originally Posted by texassapperLet's see... What happened to 20% of the US uranium stores?
That's why the Liberals are opposing the question ... they will argue the ILLEGALS ARE ENTITLED to "representation"! Did you hear the ILLEGAL ALIEN LAWYER arguing he voted at home AND here in the U.S.!!!!!
but asking if you are a citizen ..yes its a good help in apportioning electors and the house of representatives ....that's a good thing Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought
Attorney’s Oath (California)I solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of California, and that I will faithfully discharge the duties of an attorney and counselor to the best of my knowledge and ability.
How can a non-citizen vote? Originally Posted by gfejunkieIn California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.
In California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.That’s foreign intervention in our elections.
But, if we won't fight for it, we don't deserve to keep it. Originally Posted by texassapper
Let's.Dont take this personal Texas but youre a fucking moron. Nothing personal
As opposed to Hillary Clinton? hah that's funny.
Why are ALMOST ALL products made in China these days, fcuktard?
Considering the state of the economy now compared to Obama I'll take the con job anyday, dumbass. Originally Posted by texassapper
The Commerce Department said that between 1820 and 1950 almost every decennial census asked a question on citizenship in.AND from 1950 till 2010, it was still asked about on the LONGER forms, which maybe 1 in 7 people got, vice the short form which everyone got..
that's very interesting! wonder why they didn't continue this after 1950. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm
counting everyone including illegal and legal aliens has a valid statistical purpose. Originally Posted by dilbert firestormBUT as long as the census is being used to apportion both federal funds AND SEATS in congress, i do NOT SEE ANY valid purpose in counting illegal aliens.
How can a non-citizen vote? Originally Posted by gfejunkieLEGALLY, they can't. BUT too many liberals have all pushed to get them the right to vote, even if only locally (for school board elections) OR for state/federal ones (like ca does)..
That's why the Liberals are opposing the question ... they will argue the ILLEGALS ARE ENTITLED to "representation"! Did you hear the ILLEGAL ALIEN LAWYER arguing he voted at home AND here in the U.S.!!!!!How about you provide the link to the lawyer saying what you said he said....instead of the infamous "Did you hear..." crap
https://www.calbarxap.com/applicatio...ction_6068.pdf
[SIZE="2"][B] Originally Posted by LexusLover
In California, if you get a drivers license you are automatically registered to vote. But you don't need to prove your citizenship to get a drivers license. so that's how they get on the rolls in the first place...then they show up to vote with a drivers license and a bill from their address and boom...non-citizen voter. That's why libs love the motor voter laws. They also don't want the rolls reviewed to strike them off (or in Chicago to remove the dead) Them Libs are all about winning...even if they have to cheat to do it. After that, they legalize everyone...thus ensuring they win again at the next election. Our Country is slowly being stolen from us assuredly as the sun rises in the East.The lib-retards are advocating for a new "3/5's Clause". They want illegals to count for purposes of congressional apportionment, but then the lib-retards will pick the candidate they want while the illegals have no voice. Dim-retards are trying to reinstate what they lost during the Civil War.
But, if we won't fight for it, we don't deserve to keep it. Originally Posted by texassapper
Lets take the census on workers at Trump hotels, golf courses and resortsThy name is deflection.
Like everything, TrumPutin is a phony motherfucker
Why are most TrumPutin products made in other countries
You worms who voted for him may realize one day that he conned you Originally Posted by themystic
AND from 1950 till 2010, it was still asked about on the LONGER forms, which maybe 1 in 7 people got, vice the short form which everyone got.. Originally Posted by garhkalforgot that there were 2 forms, long & short. the article doesn't make clear which form was involved.
BUT as long as the census is being used to apportion both federal funds AND SEATS in congress, i do NOT SEE ANY valid purpose in counting illegal aliens.this counting of illegals affects more on the state & local level than federal. states have to plan for their budget so have to include them in their calculations.
Then perhaps we need the Scotus, to rule once and for all, whether illegal invaders ARE or are not entitled to those services (both state and federal)..the lower court & supreme court have made rulings in this area. states have always lost if they tried to use U.S. citizenship as a requirement.