Media Bias

Infowars doesn’t belong on that list any more than any other conspiracy blog. It’s not a news channel. It’s a one man circle jerk that has now even been banned from Twitter.

infowars is put at extreme conservatism, propaganda and misleading facts.


fox news is put at propaganda/misleading info. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Which is where i'd put MSNBC, CNN, CBS, ABC and NBC..

Infowars doesn’t belong on that list any more than any other conspiracy blog. It’s not a news channel. It’s a one man circle jerk that has now even been banned from Twitter. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

what is this twitter you speak of? never heard of it ..

conspiracy theories are the invention of the msm liberal biased media far more so than any so-called rightist-conspiracy site not named InfoWars.

We all know ... the liberal leftist media concocts dozens of fake news bites to demean His Regal Majesty the Lord Emperor Donald, Supreme Ruler of the Multiverse! PERIOD!

bagahayhahahaaaaa

what is this twitter you speak of? never heard of it ..

conspiracy theories are the invention of the msm liberal biased media far more so than any so-called rightist-conspiracy site not named InfoWars.

We all know ... the liberal leftist media concocts dozens of fake news bites to demean His Regal Majesty the Lord Emperor Donald, Supreme Ruler of the Multiverse! PERIOD!

bagahayhahahaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Twitter was all a-twit with the zany lib-retard conspiracy accusation that a Mexican Jewess, Zina Bash, flashed a *white supremacy* sign during the Kavanaugh hearing. hildebeest minion Amy Siskind was leading the Twitter charge.

White Supremacy Is Front And Center At Brett Kavanuagh’s Supreme Court Confirmation Hearing



(NewsOne)

Jewess? Who the heck uses that term anymore?

Holy chit, IBH.

I think that NPR is the only non biased network. They are also boring as fuck. But they don't throw in additional commentary that goes left or right. Originally Posted by Austin Ellen

I see the former CEO has a different take.https://nypost.com/2017/10/21/the-ot...-doesnt-cover/

Jewess? Who the heck uses that term anymore?

Holy chit, IBH. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

i see no reference to this. so .. you should easily post a link, yes? i mean .. if there is a link??

bahahahaaaaaaa

Jewess? Who the heck uses that term anymore?

Holy chit, IBH. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

not quite obsolete. term gets used. appears that are certain "rules" this can be used.


if the term is used by a Jew, its ok in certain context. if used by a goyim/gentile, its offensive.

i see no reference to this. so .. you should easily post a link, yes? i mean .. if there is a link??

bahahahaaaaaaa Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

here's the link.



https://www.google.com/search?q=jewe...nt=firefox-b-1

All news media outlets are total propaganda skewered either (almost all) liberal/socialist agenda and a few conservative there is no neutral at all , and at best the incompetence "run's wild" . At worst pushing the "soup of the day agenda" .

not quite obsolete. term gets used. appears that are certain "rules" this can be used.


if the term is used by a Jew, its ok in certain context. if used by a goyim/gentile, its offensive.


here's the link.

https://www.google.com/search?q=jewe...nt=firefox-b-1 Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Actually, here's the link for a legitimate definition:

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/Jewess

sometimes offensive
: a Jewish girl or woman

Notice how it says "sometimes"; not all of the time or even most of the time.

And there's the use of the word in classic literature:

In 1820, Sir Walter Scott published the novel
Ivanhoe, with heroine Rebecca, a beautiful
Jewess who refused to marry out of her faith.
Soon after the book was published, it was
rumored that Rebecca Gratz was the inspiration.

https://jwa.org/media/rebecca-of-ivanhoe

Jewish Women's Archive. "Rebecca of Ivanhoe."

And Elizabeth Taylor played a damn fine Rebecca in the movie made from the book.



The only offense I intended was entirely directed at those who were denigrating Zina Bash; not at Zina Bash, herself ... who is also damn fine.

.

Intent is irrelevant...everyone, it would behoove you to stop toeing a dangerous line with racial comments...last warning...

Wakeup, I thought "race" and/or "ethnicity" could be discussed so long as it was not directed at specific posters. Demographics and politics are almost inseparable within discussions regarding varying points of view.

All news media outlets are total propaganda skewered either (almost all) liberal/socialist agenda and a few conservative there is no neutral at all , and at best the incompetence "run's wild" . At worst pushing the "soup of the day agenda" . Originally Posted by rexdutchman

Which is why i feel that the lame stream media is no longer worthy of being labeled the free press, but the propaganda wing of the commucrat party.

not quite obsolete. term gets used. appears that are certain "rules" this can be used.


if the term is used by a Jew, its ok in certain context. if used by a goyim/gentile, its offensive. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I don’t think that’s the case, dilbert. On this one, you’re just plain wrong.

No Jews I know use that term in any context. In fact, nobody I knew in all my years growing up in Texas — Jews or Gentile— used that term. My parents didn’t use that term. My rabbi never used that term. I don’t care what links you pull off of your Google search.

There is no such thing as “a goyim.” Your research also should reveal that.

I don’t know why you chose to turn this into an argument. Consider it more of an education in the cultures of your fellow Americans.

Pity Trump wants to cut off its funding... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

There shouldn't be tax payer funding for ANY media outlet if they can't make it on their own...fold!!