Unreliable and disrespectful Sasha

Duplicate post. Sorry.

I have to give credit to BigDeal for posting this thread and letting us know who had the potential to ncns and waste our time as well, just as a providers time is equally important. In reality, the golden rule and respect goes a long way in this business. And how things change dramatically in just a matter of days. Much respect for everyone.

This girl certainly has a strange business plan; avoid Eccie and stake her reputation and success on the stool sample that is switter! Maybe she should join that other Eccie-wannabe site, out house or our house or whatever it is called.

If she thought avoiding Eccie guys would eliminate the possibility of "no" encounter reports, that goal is gone!



Intel arrived this AM advising she is the sister of Sophie's new boyfriend. That begs the question who is managing whom?

Scorpio- not to appear a WK— your comments about Sasha are just fine, but why the hell bring someone else ( Sophie) into the thread with innuendo and negative intonation. Sounds like unnecessary gossip about RW life and a bit disrespectful to me. Not consistent with your good work as a mod my friend

Have to agree with Roboz, Scorpio... Bringing in the private lives of others not associated with this thread?!? How many points would the rest of us get? Maybe consider deleting your post and associated replies... soon!

I think the information is needed and related very close to the hobby. We always talk about how these younger providers in this business are influenced one way or another, why not link a reason why a certain provider becomes disrespectful and treat our time like it is worth nothing to them. Speculation is 85% of this hobby. A new girl post an ad or a new client arrives. Both sides have to speculate on whether it is worth the time and money to see them. Hell some people on the site that have been here for years are still speculative in nature. JMO. I am now interested in how Sasha works through this over time. We'll see. Again, unreliable and disrespectful, why after a great start to her business?

is it just me or does her last pic posted on switter look like that momo thing or whatever tf that thing is called?

FYI, for the armchair critics and those who reported this thread, neither Sophie nor Sasha are even ECCIE members, so forum guidelines regarding real world info or outing are not applicable. It's not possible to out a member or compromise the anonymity of their ECCIE membership if they are not even a member here.

Scorpio- not to appear a WK— your comments about Sasha are just fine, but why the hell bring someone else ( Sophie) into the thread with innuendo and negative intonation. Sounds like unnecessary gossip about RW life and a bit disrespectful to me. Not consistent with your good work as a mod my friend Originally Posted by Roboz

Have to agree with Roboz, Scorpio... Bringing in the private lives of others not associated with this thread?!? How many points would the rest of us get?Maybe consider deleting your post and associated replies... soon! Originally Posted by Wizard of Ahhhhs

A little bit about Scorpio..
Though a few times in the past I have wanted to apply my virtual Tiity clamps That I used for Big Deal..
He is very intolerant to certain behaiviors... One being " management" of providers ( we will call it management for the sensitive minded) ESPECIALLY when their behavior is undesirable.
Considering he has abilities & access to the behind the scenes of Eccie..
And we don't.
So, that being said, some people do appreciate the information some people are offended, and he doesn't care.
Because he is very passionate about his stance on that particular topic.
And you 2 gentlemen should already KNOW that.
Now I need to Hit my basement gym before I head to the Plaza to get my SPANKINGS for the day.
OMG!! SPRING is HERE...SPANK ME !!!
Have a Wonderful day EVERYONE!!!

Sounds like unnecessary gossip about RW life Originally Posted by Roboz

Well, some RW info is routinely discussed here without running afoul of Guideline #5, i.e., She's found a RW job, she's moving to Vegas, was in an accident, etc. The issue is revealing information that could lead to outing a member, which this clearly does not. And it is interesting information that could form the basis for making hobbying decisions, which is what this forum is about, right?

I like that comment golard. Does this info help me make my own rational decisions even though there are reviews out there that tell another story. A good read is in the ks ER forum where a client has seen a provider many times, then this time he is staring down a gun barrel. I don't know the story behind all the changes in lifestyles, but I do appreciate some facts that are out there.

FYI, for the armchair critics and those who reported this thread, neither Sophie nor Sasha are even ECCIE members, so forum guidelines regarding real world info or outing are not applicable. It's not possible to out a member or compromise the anonymity of their ECCIE membership if they are not even a member here. Originally Posted by RocketSurgeon

Your point is well taken RS. But I ascribe to your tag line. Sasha’s critique although harsh was earned. I just believe drawing in another provider into the mix was unkind and unnecessary and gossip. I have said my piece

To be honest, this is why I joined. No one here wants to make a poor decision, based on only a part of the total information at hand. It can cost you in many ways. Some not so pleasant. All that has been talked about in this thread is helpful. It is up to each of us on how we decide to use it.

I appreciate the information. No one's personal RW identity was given, and it allows us to make more informed decisions. Thanks Scorpio, keep the intel coming.

... I just believe drawing in another provider into the mix was unkind... Originally Posted by Roboz

I see nothing unkind about it