Encounter: Vick at Blue 30min bbj dreaming of someone else

She is almost 50 years old.

Op is correct.

Op thank you for your your experience and honest review.

She needs to retire Originally Posted by PussySnob

Have you seen her? Doubtful, just another Troll!!!

Have you seen her? Doubtful, just another Troll!!! Originally Posted by Ghostrider

Don’t be a dick of course I’ve seen her.

To claim you've actually seen Vicky, claim she's "50," and urge that she "retire"?

Sure . . . and the Pope has just become head of the ISIS Caliphate!

Her C scar is 15 to 20 years old. You can do the math. She is a nice person and I'm sure has had some hard luck and is trying to earn a living.

The Koreans and asians in general don't age like the white women of Dallas do, which is why most of the age guesses are distorted.
Most attractive Koreans in their 20's are not looking to sit in a place like Blue and wait for 10 strangers to come in and violate them. Everyday. While netting 80 for the hour. They do that when they think it's over for them. In their 40's and often times infected already. Are you curious about the ones that just hop on BB. But you can continue to think you're invincible barebackers, until you're not.
Cheers!

Don’t be a dick of course I’ve seen her. Originally Posted by PussySnob

Enjoy your time off

Enjoy your time off Originally Posted by Ghostrider

Shill angry that a ho is around 50 years old. Lmao

notice how in all Hatchet piece reviews, the "Reviewer" walked in with no appointment? just took what was handed to him?


the House of Cards doesn't work if that thesis is not forwarded.

It’s a bold move by Trolls Chung! To discredit and discount the superb service by Vicky. These guys claim to see her yet no reviews and accusations. Take it for what it is. Worthless

Funny how perceptions differ.

I don’t purport to fully understand this unremittingly harsh and odd review, but certainly suggest reading it with a ton of salt. This handle’s previously joined the absurd lies about me supposedly taking pics without permission – but of course repeatedly begged for the pics himself(!) Originally Posted by BobbyMann

Who exactly are you referring to that begged for pictures? Recalling the provider whom I won’t name that left LH. It’s obvious you had her permission to photograph her. However I’d like to think she allowed you thinking said pics would be kept for your own private collection and not made available to the public. I’ve read a handful of your reviews, although I think some are overhyped I have found the information useful after reading thoroughly and putting aside the extras that I find unnecessary. The pictures you posted along in some have also been of help. Although I’ve never messaged you or replied to any thread of yours asking for pictures. I’m not trying to bash you or your reviews in any way just my opinion on the matter. I do find your writing style exquisite, for that I give you praise.

In a sense everyone reviewing a provider is a promoter for them or the establishment in which they work. After all I’d say the end goal is helping the girls see potential new clients and boost their income. That said reviews should be taken for what they are and not literally. Everyone’s perception will not be the same upon reading, much more once someone actually sees a provider hyping that person up after reading and then having a subpar experience. This is why I do thorough research when deciding on who to see. Having multiple positive reviews from various members on a certain provider should be a good indication on seeing that particular provider rather than there being one or very few among. Personally I’d like to see a less strict picture policy as I think it would benefit the providers and help us in making an educated decision on who to see. However I can see how the negative effects of this would outweigh the positive and as a result we must comply with the guidelines.

BM I knew you’d see my above post and wouldn’t care to elaborate. In all honesty I didn’t expect you too. I just wanted your humble opinion on the subject is all.