Here is how this conversation always runs:
Booster/Promoter: I recommend a unicorn/fresh off the plane / Kpop idol / 20 something!
Regular Dude / Someone Who Can Actually Discern Ages: Nope, your unicorn/kpop idol is 35+ attracive ajumma.
Booster/Promoter/White Knight: That is rude. Age is just a number. I care about X more than age. Asians age so well. Stop obsessing about age and hijacking this Unicorn thread.
If age does not matter, why is it touted by the shill/promoter/white knight in the first place? (Hint: it matters). Unicorns do not exist. Originally Posted by hellotherekitty
This is the best response for this post.
For people like me, age and looks matter.
In my opinion, not every reviewer in this forum is a hobbyist. Some are pimps. Originally Posted by kochu
Best Response to the Best response.
Let me add my 2 cents on this age/physical description issue.
To be fair, the worst offenders in this age/physical description debate are the Bali/Pearls/TopStar promoters(Really....Shiny is in her 20s and Bunny is in her 30's cmon dudes...get your eyes checked or spend some goddamn time in H Mart).
The ones in the "Kiss pisses Chanel No 5" camp are somewhat bad, but not the worst. The physical description is where they drop the ball. So before this group starts whinging about age issues, stop promo bumping your own threads.
The misdirection in age and physical description only works against other ladies in the same spa. There are still a whole bunch of us who like lovely Asian ladies who are in their early to mid thirties with good looks and good service and are protestant (at least to most mongers and not very openly catholic). After the hyper inflation of Nicole, I don't trust the physical description of any of the ladies who are hyped by the same group and so I have been spending my money elsewhere. And we all know where the catholic money is going.