Body type

https://www.urbandictionary.com/defi...letic&amp=true

@klassygerl you aren’t a bbw IMO. You look dang good!
I like a woman with some healthy curves, not sloppy...

too each his own!

Whatever floats your boat. Way too big for me, personally.

To me, in the photo is a full fledged bbw... Not a small bbw.

I am called bbw solely on the fact that I am 5’10 and a half lol. I am the exact size as Ashley graham and she is the media’s definition of bbw. I have heard tons on this subject since I started as a provider. I have had guys say yes I love big girls as long as your not sloppy... send me a pic of your tummy. I think that is the general idea of bbw... as long as you don’t have a big saggy tummy you are ideal. Btw funny how every time I go to type bbw it autocorrects it to babe haha. Originally Posted by klassygerl

See, looking at your pics. I would personally describe you as thick. I would not describe you as a bbw.

To me a thick girl is firm and toned as you seem to be based on your pics. A bbw is saggy and fat.

To each their own, while I prefer tiny girls, I also have had fun with several thick girls. I just stay away from the BBWs (as I described them above)

She is far from a bbw.
I would say thick more than anything.
Thick isn’t always bad either depending on how proportioned the body type is.

She's a full on BBW. Yes, she's fat. She knows it too. It's one thing to be proud of your body, but its another to be in denial of how you are viewed and how the extra weight will ultimately affect your health (i.e. diabetes, CAD hypertension, etc.). In this day and age of Ashley Grahams who say being a BBW is ok...I think that's fine to build a girl's confidence, but she needs to be real when it comes to her actual health. I'd like to ask Ashley what her blood pressure is and how her cholesterol is doing....likely not good. That's the problem with these "role models"....young girls think its ok to be sedentary and neglect their diets.

Personally, I don’t think it’s a good thing to be that heavy.
Idk why the media has to glorify it or whatever. It’s idiotic.
I can understand if you have health issues, but if you chose to be fat and just eat and eat and not make an effort to loose weight, that’s on you. Not my lifestyle. Do you, boo boo.

And, I was saying KG is not a bbw. That other gal, Ashely G is.

And, I was saying KG is not a bbw. That other gal, Ashely G is. Originally Posted by StellarPhase

I have met KG a few times, she is tall, thick and attractive. I would not say she’s a BBW. The girl in the pic is a BBW. We’ve had this discussion years ago. I believe Amish Gangster found the official chart. Fatletic was a category. It was good stuff. Maybe someone can find the thread.

This girl was on the show case header. I would say she’s thick, not BBW

https://eccie.net/providers.php?do=view&id=332207

Interesting opinions. Ashley Graham is heavy in media but certainly not by other standards. I doubt many guys would call her a BBW. I agree with Bambino that when I think of BBW I think of a girl that is heavy all over.

Hematoma brings up a health point. Ashley Graham is not that big. I haven't checked her stats but she lost a few and I doubt she's much bigger than a size 12. I'm in excellent shape. My BP averages 90/64, my cholesterol stays in the 80s and I'm a picture of health (except for the appendix, that sucked lol). Being in healthcare it's obvious obesity is a plague but she's nowhere near a size that would be detrimental to her health. I'd say the prohibited subjected enhancing help the girl in your photo uses are much more detrimental. Nothing wrong with that (I have a ton of female friends in the fitness biz and it is what it is, they aren't ashamed).

I don't think anyone in this thread is a BBW with the exception of the original photo. She's a full on BBW.

I don't get into definitions of this sort. I'm 5'9" 165lbs (heavier than some because I've been lifting since I was 16 and I have 8lbs of boobs) and a size 12 with big boobs a flat stomach and big hips. That's a much more accurate description than curvy, thick, bbw etc.

I had access to the Powder Room on Indy’s for years. The providers would post reviews on the guys there. One category was package size! another was hygiene. Funniest read ever!

The point is, providers talk as much as the hobbyists. That’s a fact.

small to med bbw. thicker than a bowl a oatmeal.

I had access to the Powder Room on Indy’s for years. The providers would post reviews on the guys there. One category was package size! another was hygiene. Funniest read ever!

The point is, providers talk as much as the hobbyists. That’s a fact. Originally Posted by bambino

Wow
That was totally off subject.

People and proclivities come in all shapes and sizes.

Why do we feel like we must label everyone/everything?

PS
I'm an extra small BBW.

Wow
That was totally off subject.

People and proclivities come in all shapes and sizes.

Why do we feel like we must label everyone/everything?

PS
I'm an extra small BBW. Originally Posted by sexymaid_69

Well the reason we label things on this board are kind of obvious. In a review you want to give others good information - and that includes looks, body type, activities, etc. So you get descriptions such as spinners, thick, bbw, etc. What people prefer are totally up to them. But knowing before hand helps others make smart choices

And it is interesting that of everyone who commented, all but one (our resident chubby chaser ) agreed the pic in the first post is a full bbw.