Here's who has qualified for the September debates so far

cut down to 7 quickly.
Booker is an ahole.
Castro is clueless, worse than a zombie
Yang simply doesn't have a chance.

I don;t understand why the Dim national board hasn't thinned it down already.
They are just letting infighting run amuck.
But it is entertaining Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

I'll give you that.
But, they should be sandbagging several others by now as well. The election is only 15 months away.

Are they going to wait for the "Lights Low" (DIM) convention before they gang up on trump? Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

Based on the DNC's rule changes for the convention next year, I think they actually want a contested convention. That way the super delegates get to vote and make the actual decision on the candidate.

Based on the DNC's rule changes for the convention next year, I think they actually want a contested convention. That way the super delegates get to vote and make the actual decision on the candidate. Originally Posted by eccielover

that seems to be the modus operandi of the democrats, yeah? don't like the way things turn out, change the rules!

super delegates!

lose by the electoral college? abolish it!

don't like a conservative Supreme Court? pack it!

rig the process! take the state level money and give it to Hillary!

brilliant!


BAHHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAA

I'd rather my tax dollars finance golf trips for Trump...he needs exercise Originally Posted by matchingmole

The hell with Golf. Trump needs to go to a Shooting Range and get some tactical training or to a Dojo and learn how to throw a migrant over a wall or a big mouth liberal out of one of his rallies

Based on the DNC's rule changes for the convention next year, I think they actually want a contested convention. That way the super delegates get to vote and make the actual decision on the candidate. Originally Posted by eccielover

That way the DNC has the power and is owed.

https://www.realclearpolitics.com/ar...ia_141055.html

What makes a poll “qualifying” in the eyes of the DNC? The answer is conspicuously inscrutable. Months ago, party chieftains issued a list of “approved sponsoring organizations/institutions” for polls that satisfy their criteria for debate admittance. Not appearing on that list is the Boston Globe, which sponsored a Suffolk University poll published Aug. 6 that placed Gabbard at 3%. The DNC had proclaimed that for admittance to the September and October debates, candidates must secure polling results of 2% or more in four separate “approved” polls -- but a poll sponsored by the newspaper with the largest circulation in New Hampshire (the Globe recently surpassed the New Hampshire Union Leader there) does not count, per this cockamamie criteria. There has not been an officially qualifying poll in New Hampshire, Gabbard’s best state, in over a month.

TWK, thanks for posting the information.

that seems to be the modus operandi of the democrats, yeah? don't like the way things turn out, change the rules!
super delegates!
lose by the electoral college? abolish it!
don't like a conservative Supreme Court? pack it!
rig the process! take the state level money and give it to Hillary!
brilliant!
BAHHAHHAHAHAAAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Exactly,
Nice synopsis
Hildebeast simply likes her quasi retirement though.

Billary--------------------------

Exactly,
Nice synopsis
Hildebeast simply likes her quasi retirement though. Originally Posted by Unique_Carpenter

she has plenty of time for her daily IV's of Chardonnay

At this point Beto is just embarrassing himself.