I have to say her ad looked enticing and due to the info in his report, we now all know we should steer clear. His info was helpful and probably more valuable than most reports on here as it helped keep people safe and prevented some ripoffs. If this kind of report fails the standards, then the standards are failing.
"”Before you submit the review, re-read it and ask yourself one question: " If I had never read a review or heard of this provider, is there enough quality information in the review to make an informed and educated decision on whether I would enjoy a session with this lady""
Saying "I was ripped off" is more than enough for me to make a decision, her location and the state of her house notwithstanding.
Folks-We talking about a few weeks of extra access on a review site. Not the same as being unfairly denied winnings from tonite's lotto drawing.I have been denied in the past once or twice for what I thought were unfair or incorrect reasons. Not worth sweating it imo. They not going to change their rules just because a few guys are unhappy with them. Props to guy who posted about ripoff initially. You likely saved some guys from losing some $ to this girl or possibly much worse things, plus reinforce need for guys to be careful and also think with the correct head.
My 3 cents:
1 cent - Look at the background of her place in the pics. Gross! Not June Cleaver approved.
2 cents - her menu offers Greek, but nothing about bj type. C'mon!
3rd cent - and she used the wrong "to". Unacceptable
Amsterdam for hobbyists around here is like Chinatown for private eye Jake Gittes in the famous movie of the same name. It's a pretty clear analogy.