Another indicator that Odumbo's nuclear treaty was a POS

senate intel committe and barr appear to be looking at 2 different data sets and have different conclusions on what the data says.


they are contradictory. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

The actual evidence says otherwise.

Declassified Horowitz Footnotes Show Odumbo Officials Knew Steele Dossier Was Russian Disinformation Designed To Target Trump

Newly declassified footnotes from Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz’s December FBI report reveals that senior Odumbo officials, including members of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane team knew the dossier compiled by a former British spy during the 2016 election was Russian disinformation to target President Donald Trump.

Further, the partially declassified footnotes reveal that those senior intelligence officials were aware of the disinformation when they included the dossier in the Odumbo administration’s Intelligence Communities Assessment (ICA).

(Sara Carter)

EL - Amen - while j66 has trumpeted the "Russian interference" - it is clear there was no "Collusion with nor participation with" the Trump campaign to illegally affect the 2016 election.



I hear from somebody that Putin favors Biden in the coming election - what say One to that????
j66

"More gravely, they said that CIA Director Brennan suppressed facts or analysis that showed why it was not in Russia’s interests to support Trump and why Putin stood to benefit from Hillary Clinton’s election. They also told me that Brennan suppressed that intelligence over the objections of CIA analysts.


House Intelligence Committee staff told me that after an exhaustive investigation reviewing intelligence and interviewing intelligence officers, they found that Brennan suppressed high-quality intelligence suggesting that Putin actually wanted the more predictable and malleable Clinton to win the 2016 election.


Instead, the Brennan team included low-quality intelligence that failed to meet intelligence community standards to support the political claim that Russian officials wanted Trump to win, House Intelligence Committee staff revealed. They said that CIA analysts also objected to including that flawed, substandard information in the assessment."




Putin did not want Trump to win. the last thing he wanted is a strong nationalist America First president.

So at this point we have different opinions on the scope or purpose of Russian interference with the election.

And yet none of these reports point to or support any collusion by the Trump campaign.

And interestingly enough as pointed out by Jax's story, the Senate has kicked the can down the road on the Steele dossier and it's impact on anything, specifically leaving it out and ignoring it in any analysis they have done to date.

That will be in their "fifth" and what is to be the final report at this point. Originally Posted by eccielover

Bingo! That's the bottom line. All the left can keep repeating is that Russia tried to interfere in the election. Yes they did!


Russia wanted Trump to win! We are beginning to see some evidence to doubt that but so did I, so I'm supposed to hold that against him? There is more than enough evidence, some of it came right out of the mouth of one of the foremost experts on Russia, Dr Fiona Hill, when she testified before the House committee that the purpose of the Russian disinformation campaign was not necessarily to elect Trump even though there was no possible way of doing that, but to in her words "sow chaos" by playing both sides. We know for a fact that some Russian disinformation was critical of Trump. That right there proves what Dr. Hill said. They wanted us fighting and doubting whether our election results could be trusted and they exceeded beyond their wildest dreams due to the corruption of the deep state.


To this day not one American that I am aware of has said their vote was impacted by what they heard from Russian troll farms, not one.

People like Jaxson blinded by hate, don't have the sophistication to analyze all the available information and come to a rational conclusion. He hears what he wants to hear and that is enough for him.


One sentence from Dr. Hill would have put the whole subject to rest but then that wouldn't fit the narrative he wanted.

Well done - HF

+1 !!!

. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

From the Radio Farda article: From the mouth of your guy Albright.

"This site may have been close to being able to make weapon-grade uranium cores for nuclear weapons, albeit no evidence Iran had any weapon-grade uranium yet," Albright said. "

Without enriched Uranium, you have NOTHING. You can even power up city lights, let alone make an Atomic Bomb.

From the Radio Farda article: From the mouth of your guy Albright.

"This site may have been close to being able to make weapon-grade uranium cores for nuclear weapons, albeit no evidence Iran had any weapon-grade uranium yet," Albright said. "

Without enriched Uranium, you have NOTHING. You can even power up city lights, let alone make an Atomic Bomb. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Which does not in anyway downplay the OP.

the discovery of this new site "shows the extent to which Tehran lied to international inspectors about its past and possibly ongoing nuclear weapons program.”

I hear from somebody that Putin favors Biden in the coming election - what say One to that????
j66 Originally Posted by oeb11

Thank yous president Trump!

LOLLING!

I find it super-double-duper chuckle worthy that the Spy Masters happened to pick Carter Page as their entry point. He was a dweeb, to say the least, that had no real role in the Trump camp. In essence, they laid their schlong on the line for someone that had nothing to do with anything and they will end up getting castrated for it.

...I hear from somebody that Putin favors Biden in the coming election... Originally Posted by oeb11

I heard it from someone that Osama Bin Laden preferred Joe Biden. Imagine that?

From the Radio Farda article: From the mouth of your guy Albright.

"This site may have been close to being able to make weapon-grade uranium cores for nuclear weapons, albeit no evidence Iran had any weapon-grade uranium yet," Albright said. "

Without enriched Uranium, you have NOTHING. You can even power up city lights, let alone make an Atomic Bomb. Originally Posted by adav8s28

Iran didn't report it, and Odumbo missed it on his ~inspection tour~ -- proving again that Odumbo NEVER established a base line on which to ground his POS treaty!

Speaking of Covid drowning out reports.

Senate Intel report confirms Russia aimed to help Trump in 2016

https://www.politico.com/news/2020/0...in-2016-198171

It’s the third time the Senate intelligence committee agreed with the intelligence reports....but, but, but, Durham, eh? Originally Posted by Jaxson66

Even if true, how is that Trump's fault? He can't stop them from wanting him to win. But that doesn't mean he colluded with them to do anything.

I'm sure the Russians have had favorites in every US election of my lifetime. Were the Russian-favored candidates all colluders?