Socked, stunned and pleased

Biden is innocent of these clearly politically motivated allegations!

his defense is airtight!!!

innocent by senility. the turd simply can't remember doing it.


BAHHAAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Best statement in the thread.

I have said it before -- every allegation of sexual misconduct whether in the public or private sector must be investigated with equality. That is no way hypocritical.



I'm not suggesting that you are a hypocrite, I'm asking you if the women in the Democrat party are being hypocrites when they are on record in the Kavanaugh hearings saying that all women MUST be believed and now with allegations against Biden will not make the same statement. Are they being hypocrites? I just want to see if you can bring yourself to say something you know to be true.


The allegations against Trump, Kavanaugh, and Biden all come down to "he-said, she-said" and I don't see how at the current time Biden will be found any more guilty than Trump or Kavanaugh.



I agree but then I never suggested that Biden should be found guilty because I never suggested that Trump and Kavanaugh should be found guilty without evidence and due process. Again, I'm asking whether Democrats, especially the woman are being hypocrites by not applying the same standard they applied to Kavanaugh?


The allegations against Biden are being covered by all the news media -- BBC, Washington Post, NY Times, Forbes, NY Post, CNN, VOX, The Hill, Elle, CBS News, NBC News, Business Insider, USA Today, Vanuty Fair, PBS, The Guardian, The Nation, National Review, Politico, Jacobin, Boston Herald, The Economist -- in either the last few days or since mid-April. Some favorable for Biden and some unfavorable.



Please list the unfavorable ones because I haven't seen it yet before the New York Times called the Biden campaign and Stacey Abrams liars which they just did.


I do disagree with your statement "The only way out of this for the women of the Democrat party, is to say "it doesn't matter, we must defeat Trump"."


Then how do they justify voting for Biden if all women should be believed without admitting it doesn't matter when defeating Trump is all that really matters? Should they just not answer the question now that they have been caught in a lie on top of their hypocrisy?


I think they should say exactly what I said in my first paragraph in this post. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

OH! So you think they are going to call for the FBI to investigate Joe Biden like they did for Kavanaugh? Would you like to bet on that? Abrams hinted that there should be an investigation but followed with "and the New York Times has already done that clearing Biden" to which the New York Times said Uh, NO, we didn't say that. Now what do they say?

OH! So you think they are going to call for the FBI to investigate Joe Biden like they did for Kavanaugh? Would you like to bet on that? Abrams hinted that there should be an investigation but followed with "and the New York Times has already done that clearing Biden" to which the New York Times said Uh, NO, we didn't say that. Now what do they say? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

so the NY Times are a branch of the FBI .. who knew???


BAHHHAAAAAA

And who is the absolute worst woman on this subject. Kirstin Gillibrand



https://video.foxnews.com/v/61530274...#sp=show-clips

Stacy Abrams will eat the cake before they can take it. Originally Posted by friendly fred

So...She will eat the cake

So...She will eat the cake Originally Posted by matchingmole

she'll be grazing out in the pasture like all cows








BAHHAAAAAAAA

So...She will eat the cake Originally Posted by matchingmole

she'll be grazing out in the pasture like all cows






BAHHAAAAAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

flatulence knows no limits.... MOOOOOOO!!!!!

If the FBI should be required to look into an allegation against a nominee for the Supreme Court, shouldn't that also look into the nominee for President? Assuming Biden becomes the nominee. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

OH! So you think they are going to call for the FBI to investigate Joe Biden like they did for Kavanaugh? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Why should the FBI investigate Biden?

I want to know what happened, but I don't want the FBI called in. It's one thing to do background checks for nominees to the Supreme Court, e.g. Kavanaugh. They can also get involved if an Inspector General refers a matter to them, e.g. Hillary Clinton's (mis)handling of official emails while serving as SOS.

But I don't want the FBI doing background checks on politicians running for office. That's too close to spying on a campaign, which is precisely what obama/comey/brennan did.

Both parties should vet their own fucking candidates. Keep the fucking FBI out of it.

flatulence knows no limits.... MOOOOOOO!!!!! Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

if she was a Republican AOC would demand she wear a "fart diaper"


BAHHHAAA


http://under-tec.com/









BAHHAAAA

So...She will eat the cake Originally Posted by matchingmole

Every night if she can...

Why should the FBI investigate Biden?

I want to know what happened, but I don't want the FBI called in. It's one thing to do background checks for nominees to the Supreme Court, e.g. Kavanaugh. They can also get involved if an Inspector General refers a matter to them, e.g. Hillary Clinton's handling of official emails while serving as SOS.

But I don't want the FBI doing background checks on politicians campaigning for office. That's too close to spying on a campaign, which is precisely what obama/comey/brennan did. Originally Posted by lustylad

I was being flippant, my bad. As I have tried to say a couple of times now, I really don't care if Biden is investigated because as SR said, I don't think anybody will be any more successful at proving Biden guilty than those that tried to prove Bill Clinton, Trump or Kavanaugh guilty.


What I'm pissed about is the "FemmiNazis's" as Limbaugh use to call them and Carlson refereed to them as "Institutional Feminist" women like Gillibrand who will not hold Biden to the same standard they held Kavanaugh to. Gillibrand also repeated the "Biden campaign lie" as the Times put it by saying an investigation had been done and that Biden asked for that investigation though nobody seems to be able to prove he ever uttered those words because if he did, he would open himself up to releasing his Senate record to see if a complaint from Reade was ever entered in his record.


I want to hear the leaders of the Women's movement, the women of the Democrat party that came down on Kavanaugh with both feet, why this is different, why Reade shouldn't be believed and an investigation by whomever the proper agency should be.



So who does do an investigation of a Presidential nominee when a crime is alleged if not law enforcement? And should a Presidential nominee get special treatment not given to any other American citizen?

So who does do an investigation of a Presidential nominee when a crime is alleged if not law enforcement? And should a Presidential nominee get special treatment not given to any other American citizen? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Good question. Depends on the nature and seriousness of the allegation. In this case I would rely on the other campaign's opposition research team, assisted by the media. I'm not generally a fan of "trial in the court of public opinion" but isn't that what every election boils down to anyway? No, Presidential nominees shouldn't get special treatment. But it's not really a prosecutable matter at this point. It happened 27 years ago, and if Biden wasn't the presumptive nominee it wouldn't be newsworthy.

P.S. I agree 100% with your points on the hypocrisy of the dim-retards and the #metoo movement.

I think Tammy Duckworth is the front runner for Biden's VP, not the fat lady Abrams.

Senator Duckworth is a disabled Asian American woman and not too liberal. She doesn't have a long track record so they can make up a bunch of positive attributes and get enough fluff PR pieces published to make her look good.

Finally, it isn't too easy for Trump to overly criticize a wounded war vet.

OH! So you think they are going to call for the FBI to investigate Joe Biden like they did for Kavanaugh? Would you like to bet on that? Abrams hinted that there should be an investigation but followed with "and the New York Times has already done that clearing Biden" to which the New York Times said Uh, NO, we didn't say that. Now what do they say? Originally Posted by HedonistForever

There were no calls to have the FBI investigate Trump. Therefore, I see no reason to have the FBI investigate Biden. Abrams is one person. She does not speak for the whole Democratic party. Are there other women who have made statements similar to those made by Abrams? If you go back to 2016, I doubt many Republican women came out making negative statements about Trump's alleged sexual misconduct.

Please list the unfavorable ones because I haven't seen it yet before the New York Times called the Biden campaign and Stacey Abrams liars which they just did.

Almost all the news sources basically supported the news and did not pass judgement one way or the other. The Daily Beast was unfavorable towards Biden. As was the Business Insider article.

This article also is unfavorable towards Biden.

https://www.city-journal.org/biden-c...kaAuOyEALw_wcB

Then how do they justify voting for Biden if all women should be believed without admitting it doesn't matter when defeating Trump is all that really matters? Should they just not answer the question now that they have been caught in a lie on top of their hypocrisy?

All women should not automatically be believed. All women's allegations should be investigated. As with all the women who alleged sexual misconduct against Trump, Tara Reade's allegations should be investigated to the fullest. And if Biden can be found guilty, he should drop out.

I think Tammy Duckworth is the front runner for Biden's VP, not the fat lady Abrams.

Senator Duckworth is a disabled Asian American woman and not too liberal. She doesn't have a long track record so they can make up a bunch of positive attributes and get enough fluff PR pieces published to make her look good.

Finally, it isn't too easy for Trump to overly criticize a wounded war vet. Originally Posted by friendly fred

Tammy Duckworth? Interesting.

https://www.cnn.com/2020/04/09/polit...ick/index.html