Encounter: Crystal wow!

My record speaks for itself
Finding *it* has not been an issue
Except, finding decent, helpful, considerate & thoughtful discourse...
that can sometimes seem pretty scarce

But I am learning...
to care at least a little bit less
Nihilism is seeping into me, too

I have never cared about following every *lead*
that starts with having to google something

I will really try hard not to respond, at all
when somebody gaslights us

I will tell myself...
“Just don’t give af, joyote! What does it matter? Who cares?”

Blah blah nihilism blah blah

a review is not an ad. an intersection is not an address Originally Posted by joyote

Well since the Encounter Report template clearly says to use “general area only” for the Address field, I’d say an intersection IS appropriate.

You make sense Abqspencer. Joyote on the other hand is a schmuck.

Folks knock off the BS back and forth. Insults are not needed.

Yes. After all, we have people who are very fine people, here, on both sides

abqspencer - yes, the template for Encounter Reports does say,
“general area only”
The templates for Studio, Strip Club, and AMP/Spa Encounters
says the same
My guess is that the template was written for 1 scenario,
then copy & pasted for the rest

It has been shown, by myself & others, that it’s ok
to post a full address in amp reviews
Even better, imo, would be to link an ad,
which usually states the full address, phone number, hours of operation...
helpful info that anyone who takes an interest would likely want
Their ad puts all that in the public domain,
unlike escorts, who need to keep their locations confidential

So, I think it’s ok to post an address or link an ad in a spa review
But, yes, it is also “appropriate” to be much more vague
Nobody said it’s not appropriate
What I said is,
“a review is not an ad. an intersection is not an address”
Maybe some will contend
that a review IS an ad, or intersection IS an address

I did say, at one point, that I thought amp reviews “should” (my bad), imo,
include an address or a link to an ad
That seems to me like a long time ago, now
Since then, I have learned to care less,.....though...
it is obvious to me that I need to care even less

To help make my point, I wrote this review,
as what I consider to be a good example
(it is real & genuine, nothing made up)...

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2691800

...note the absence of any instructions, illustrations, or gps coordinates
It does include an address. in a later post, I added a link to an ad
It wasn’t that hard!

But, the people have spoken
It seems that some (most?) who are writing reviews in the amp section
prefer to write reviews that are more like this one...

https://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=2691812

...though, do they really prefer to read that type?

whatever. I no longer care

There are still some here whose input I value
and who value mine
Info still comes out that is useful & helpful
I know it when I see it
I will focus my energy and attention on that

TL;DR

I don’t disagree, AMP and similar SHOULD have an address. Best practice should be if they advertise an address it should be fine to include

Just like strip clubs, should be fine to use the name given. Never made sense to include names of AMP girls and not strippers. That’s dumb.