Encounter: Cutie wasn't cute in Uniontown

I think you’re reading a bit too much into this my guy.

Some guys like raunchy. If you’re into that, you’re into this chick. I don’t see what your issue is. If you’re looking a cheap steak, longhorn is your place. If you’re looking for filet, that’s not the place.

In your words you are saying that I did not enjoy LongHorn steakhouse and the ambience of the place wasn't very good so your money is better spent at outback. But I recommend longhorn Originally Posted by Btkp07e

Dude, we get it already, you disagree with the OP's review, even he has rebuked you, quit being a moron, and just let it go.

I've had encounters that on the basis of looks, weren't that great, but, activities were more than acceptable, Trish, who went by the handle "Ugly white female" was one of them.

Larger, but very passionate, I never even bothered with a condom, we also hit it off personally, and, sometimes you get someone there for their pleasure, having a provider say that "you are the guy I was waiting for all day", while you are doing it raw is a fucking turn on.

I figured everybody wanted to rubber up, and I was the one guy who felt safe enough with her to do it like her SO.

I don't need PA access to get it.

Move along.

I have a girl I am seeing and have been seeing, but it is ridiculous with people's inability to comprehend the English language. when things are put into perspective as I have given you in the analogies, it looks sad and pathetic a yes recommendation. If the actions were better he should have stated such. But he did not. So in all actuality the fact that he left out details in the ROS brings the conclusion that either it's another sadly listed Pittsburgh yes or the writer just doesn't know how to express the actions properly. I call it like I see it. The analogies given are precise based on the author's exact words.

The analogies given are precise based on the author's exact words. Originally Posted by Btkp07e

Dude, you're a liar. I called you out on it and now you're throwing all these "analogies" trying to justify your lie. It's become really pathetic and a bit comical... so just keep it going, lol.

Well, I don’t frequent Longhorn or Outback much. When I want a good steak, I’ll go to Hyde Park, or one of the other high end steak places. But when I want an economical meal, I’ll go to Longhorn. I would give them a yes recommendation because they do what they do well. Is it the best? No. How’s that for an analogy. At the end of the day, some people make mountains out of molehills.

Well, I don’t frequent Longhorn or Outback much. When I want a good steak, I’ll go to Hyde Park, or one of the other high end steak places. But when I want an economical meal, I’ll go to Longhorn. I would give them a yes recommendation because they do what they do well. Is it the best? No. How’s that for an analogy. At the end of the day, some people make mountains out of molehills. Originally Posted by bambino

Spot on as far as I am concerned.

Dude, you're a liar. I called you out on it and now you're throwing all these "analogies" trying to justify your lie. It's become really pathetic and a bit comical... so just keep it going, lol. Originally Posted by Stormranger

Tell me one thing I said that is a lie since u r calling me one. Give me one word for a quote of his review that isn't true.

Well, I don’t frequent Longhorn or Outback much. When I want a good steak, I’ll go to Hyde Park, or one of the other high end steak places. But when I want an economical meal, I’ll go to Longhorn. I would give them a yes recommendation because they do what they do well. Is it the best? No. How’s that for an analogy. At the end of the day, some people make mountains out of molehills. Originally Posted by bambino

Yes, but u just explained exactly why you would go there. It's economical and passable. The review had absolutely ZERO positive words about the provider with the exception of "she was nice and got the job done". However, he lists many many flaws, not like pix, fat and sweaty, trashy place, he even had to close his eyes and picture something else. Your hand can get the job done as well but it's not as enjoyable. When u list a bunch wrong to one thing that's ok, that's definitely not a yes recommendation, ESPECIALLY when he ends off saying money better spent elsewhere. Logically, if he says spend elsewhere it means don't spend on her!! So how can u recommend someone when saying don't spend on her??!!!

This is fun btw, but just think logically, if you are told don't spend your money here bc it's better spent elsewhere, how can that be followed by yes go there I recommend it!! Or maybe u didn't see the ROS where he says, and I quote ".8 would have been much better spent at an AMP"

Opinions will always differ. We have driven that point home on this thread.

Back to the discussion of the provider being reviewed.

Tell me one thing I said that is a lie Originally Posted by Btkp07e

You claimed that I said "I'm never going back"

That is a lie... I never said that. I've already explained this and you still don't admit it... you just keep trying to justify your lie. Ask again... I'll try to use smaller words for you.

Back to the discussion of the provider being reviewed. Originally Posted by dj8rocks

As far as this girl goes, she isn't a thief, she isn't drunk or drugged, she got the job done... there are way better and worse options. YMMV

Ok everyone, I apologise. Even though he states that 1) she isn't like her pix 2) she is fat and sweaty 3) trailer is trashed 4) had to close his eyes and imagine something else and 5) he advised spending money elsewhere like at an AMP, he must also be passing wonderful advise to recommend people go there.
So just to make the facts clear, Storm ranger recommends people go to someone who isn't like pix, fat and sweaty, trashed place, has to imagine being somewhere else with eyes closed and says money better spent elsewhere, but on top of that, and with the money better spent elsewhere line he still recommends going to see her.
Yep, anyone with an IQ above a frog is gonna clearly take your recommendation to see her when in your own review and in your own words say it's better to spend money elsewhere!

The first clue is need Sheetz.

Dude, the yes recommendation is for the fact that she was safe and performed well. Some guys like fat chicks. Some guys don’t mind going to crappy, messy trailers to get a cheap bng type session. The OP clearly said she wasn’t his type, but she might well be someone else’s. The yes recommendation is to let guys who aren’t bothered by what the OP considered to be negative aspects that she’s safe and does a good job. There’s a LOT worse that can go wrong when meeting a provider than she’s ugly, fat or doesn’t perform well. The yes recommendation just lets others know that none of those things were issues. If you have PA you got an accurate picture of the encounter and you can decide for yourself regardless of the recommendation.