So What Happens If President Trump’s Bank Records Show No Illegal Activity.

show me the man, and i'll show you the crime

or something like that- Beria

these terrible fishing expeditions are anti-American

there is not crime, there is mere rank speculation or even less, hopeful discovery

I'm sure some crime could be found under all these dim beds

I remember a time when we welcomed rooting out corruption, even if it pulled down our guy.

root out corruption BUT NOW its only big t no one else hypocrisy at best deep state at worst

Mike Flynn - an example of what the leftists do to those they designate as a threat to their narrative.

Sullivan is holding up the dismissal of charges as a ;prosecutor' to delay the case until afte rthe election - so a new Ag under senile Biden can re-institute the prosecution and persecution.



It is not about corruption - the accusation and prosecution is a tool for the left to destroy their 'opponents. "

I remember a time when we welcomed rooting out corruption, even if it pulled down our guy. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I thought that was the AMERICAN way.

Irrelevant and on Ignore, YR!

I was over a system that literally sent out hundreds of millions of dollars in checks and EFTs. True, accountants approved the payments. My system signed the checks both physically and via EFT. The president had no clue on the vast majority of checks. Some of the accountants fudged the system and set themselves as vendors to be paid. We had auditors on the take. We had higher ups giving payments to Chinese as bribes even though they weren't viewed at the time as bribes.

There's an arms length deniability to most of these payments. OJ didn't do the drug deals, he had Kato do it for him. Same in business. Originally Posted by gnadfly

okay my presumption was you meant internal stuff like payroll and paying vendors. obviously not the usual stuff for the kind of fraud you meant. not that someone hasn't skimmed payroll too ...

I remember a time when we welcomed rooting out corruption, even if it pulled down our guy. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

You have a point there...

It is not about corruption - the accusation and prosecution is a tool for the left to destroy their 'opponents. " Originally Posted by oeb11

all that's missing is the committee of public safety and its law of 22 prairial, year II , which suspended a suspect’s right to public trial and to legal assistance and left the jury a choice only of acquittal or death.

That will come - if biden is elected count on 'prosecutions' - of Trump - theentire Republican cabinet, and packing teh SC with far-leftists who will do the radicals bidding.

Nov 3 is a date to decide whether the Constitution and representative democracy survive, or the DPST radicals pitch us into an amerika of Orwell's 1984.

I remember a time when we welcomed rooting out corruption, even if it pulled down our guy. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

I remember a time when there were civil rights, and a crime was identified before tearing apart someone and their family’s lives.

I remember a time when there were civil rights, and a crime was identified before tearing apart someone and their family’s lives. Originally Posted by Jacuzzme

exactly

crime first

then investigate the crime

these idiots, in their discriminate partisanship, think its ok to investigate the person until something is found

I thought that was the AMERICAN way. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Fuck do you know about America?

I'll admit that I don't like or trust Trump, but neither am I a far leftist either, mainly a GDI (old facts will know that term) that votes for lesser of two evils. I say that cause I don't welcome attack by haters of either side. I have pretty good income from wages and salary and very few "deductions", especially with recent tax structure and pay 80 to 100k fed personal income tax yearly. Not complaining, in fact feel obligated to pay my share (some may say more than my fair share, but ok by me) to support this great country. It would really piss me off to find that the president (regardless of political affiliation) was making way more than me and paying way less in personal income tax. I have no proof at all, but my gut tells me that his returns aren't being published because they will look bad and that could be the reason. The same opinion applies to past presidents from either party if true of any of them. I'd be doubly pissed if returns show he's drawing social security (again, not sure at all that he's eligible) and paying little to no personal income tax.

okay my presumption was you meant internal stuff like payroll and paying vendors. obviously not the usual stuff for the kind of fraud you meant. not that someone hasn't skimmed payroll too ... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The system I supported pretty much paid everything and was multinational but accountants eventually have to approve the transactions because they have to fund the accounts.