Riots Are Justified. The Recent Chicago Lootings.

Maybe the response yous fished out of your treasure trove of fascist propagandas said that, but the reports we’ve seen from Chicago has the mayor calling the looters engaging in the “straight up felony” behaviour. FINALLY! She previously referred to them as "Protesters." Sunday, she broke down.

But what part does fact play in your narrative, eh? A big part since my narrative is "the truth!"Yours is post count.

You “assumed” the victim was black?The clip I saw the police chief didn't identify the race. It did trigger a BLM response.

Give ‘em a tug, bud. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Stop focusing on my balls, creep.

If it's given to you it's "reparations". If you take it, it's theft.

Maybe the response yous fished out of your treasure trove of fascist propagandas said that, but the reports we’ve seen from Chicago has the mayor calling the looters engaging in the “straight up felony” behaviour.

But what part does fact play in your narrative, eh?

You “assumed” the victim was black?

Give ‘em a tug, bud. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Yes, Mayor Lightfoot actually responded well to this incident of looting.

She needs to keep it up - apparently she was also mad at some of your friends congregating at the waterfront....

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot Broke Up Gay Beach Party; Failed to Protect Downtown

Chicago Mayor Lori Lightfoot is facing criticism from an outraged city after she devoted personal attention to clearing a beach party from the lakefront but could not stop looters from ransacking the Magnificent Mile and other retail districts. On Saturday, Lightfoot tweeted a photograph of a gathering near Lake Michigan,...

[picture of a bunch of faggots, not really very pleasing to see]

https://www.newsbreak.com/illinois/c...otect-downtown

Mayor light'headed' will take flak for screwing over her own LGBTQ group.

What is the world coming to???
LOL


New DPST motto - Violence Uber Alles!!!!
Theri antifa and OBLM are the new 1930's german brown-shirts.

Foxx announced in December 2016, shortly before taking office, that her office wouldn’t charge shoplifters with felonies unless they either had more than 10 previous felony convictions or if they stole more than $1,000 worth of goods, which was more than triple the previous felony threshold of $300.

Storeowners blamed Foxx’s policy in December 2019 for what they said was a string of brazen thefts targeting their businesses.

Foxx announced in June that she wouldn’t prosecute protesters charged with minor crimes, such as curfew violations and disorderly conduct, in the unrest following the death of George Floyd. Floyd, a black man, died after a Minneapolis police officer knelt on his neck for more than eight minutes, video shows.


Multiple analyses of Foxx’s record have found significant decreases in prosecutions since she took office.

The Chicago Tribune published an analysis Monday showing that Foxx dropped all charges against 30% of defendants in her first three years in office, while her Democratic predecessor, Anita Alvarez, dropped charges against 20% of defendants in her final three years on the job.


A report in June from the Law Enforcement Legal Defense Fund, a pro-police nonprofit, found “a 13% decrease in felony guilty outcomes, with a 27% decline in guilty verdicts and a 54% increase in dropped and dismissed cases” since Foxx took office in 2017.

A separate study by the Marshall Project, a nonprofit supporting criminal justice reform, also found that Foxx has dropped thousands of cases that would have been prosecuted by her predecessor.

“We found that since she took office she turned away more than 5,000 cases that would have been pursued by previous State’s Attorney Anita Alvarez, mostly by declining to prosecute low-level shoplifting and drug offenses and by diverting more cases to alternative treatment programs,” the October 2019 report said.

Foxx faced criticism for her handling of the case against actor Jussie Smollett, who was accused in February 2019 of staging a hate crime against himself. In April 2019, the Chicago police union declared “no confidence” in Foxx.

Another hurricane should come and wash their asses away, only with no assistance from anyone. Just let them drown. For cleansing purposes, Survival of the Fittest. Well, except for the helpless animals. Originally Posted by Alyssa XOXO

I'm wondering when the first hurricane hit Chicago, exactly.



Of course, I feel the same in regards to "cleansing" when it comes to those who "out" others.....

Stop focusing on my balls, creep. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Nobody said anything abouts your balls, Nadsy. Yous are projecting again!

Don’t know if yous can call other members of this forum “creep” anymore, though.

LOLLING!

I'm wondering when the first hurricane hit Chicago, exactly. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

Dunno when the first one hit, but since Chicago is next to Lake Michigan try googling Hurricane Sandy Chicago.

Dunno when the first one hit, but since Chicago is next to Lake Michigan try googling Hurricane Sandy Chicago. Originally Posted by gnadfly

Yeah-- but was it still a hurricane at that point? I honestly don't remember and frankly don't care enough about Chicago as a whole.

Effective but not very subtles uses of doggy style whistles!

You seem all in on “cleansing.”

Pretty bitter, if you’d ask me. Please check your hate at the door. Originally Posted by HoeHummer

And what was your comment about the thread...I thought so

Nobody said anything abouts your balls, Nadsy. Yous are projecting again!

Don’t know if yous can call other members of this forum “creep” anymore, though.

LOLLING! Originally Posted by HoeHummer

Would yous rather be called a Ne'er-do-well??

just call hh YR - they are one and the same!

I'm wondering when the first hurricane hit Chicago, exactly. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

its called derecho.

https://abc7chicago.com/property-man...oting/6367902/

The Mayor's response is weak. It's basically the response of many of these mayors: We've been doing every we can. Forget that we stopped arresting people and letting those go that we arrested.

This part is an interesting dodge. We can't monitor Social Media because of privacy concerns. WTF???

https://abc7chicago.com/property-man...oting/6367902/

The Mayor's response is weak. It's basically the response of many of these mayors: We've been doing every we can. Forget that we stopped arresting people and letting those go that we arrested.

This part is an interesting dodge. We can't monitor Social Media because of privacy concerns. WTF??? Originally Posted by gnadfly

so corporations can search social media to vet job applicants and the press can scan social media to dig up 10 year old "racist" posts but city governments can't. let's restate that ... they won't.