I Am Embarrassed: The World Is Watching

I agree the dim-wits have again caused damage to the election process just like 2000 with gore

It was stable in 2016, when Trump squeaked out a win, then got Clinton's concession, but in 2020 when Biden wins more decisively, the system is rigged and corrupt.

Got it. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Hey stupid! We didnt have millions more of unsecure mail in ballots in 2016! And all the shady things libs have done this year to unsure a biden victory

Like actually voting. In fact 5 million more than Trump. But oddly down ballot republicans did just fine, in fact, they made gains. It’s pretty clear there wasn’t cheating there was just “fire Trump”.


Trump lost. But he did save the senate, he should be proud.

Joe Biden is the projected winner of the 2020 presidential election

Well you ever heard of "Benfords law" one way or the other showing massive fraud for Joeys and hoeys

At the very least should be looked into, and again thanks to the dim-wits for letting it happen

WSNDs can’t live with them, can’t wait to be without ‘em!

Republican candidates seemed to care well. Americans just fucking hate Trump. Deservedlys so.

Where are all the Trumpholians marching in your streets wearing Dick caps? It would be appropriate after the pussy riots of 2016.

The "voting process" had it's faults but the fact that we have a Democratic process at all is an example to countries like Iran who is saying in essence "see how fucked up America is by having a Democratic process while we deny our people that right and actually imprison people who don't do what the government tells them to do"!


How fucked is that for "reasoning"?


Now we are witnessing another process that much of the world doesn't have, a court process to determine whether "the people's will" ( including the electoral college ) wins in the end.


Who gives a fuck what China, Russia and Iran say about our process? For that matter, who gives a fuck what France or Germany thinks?


This is what Democracy looks like and I'm proud as hell that we have it with all it's faults. At least we try.

Weren’t you just complaining that the system failed and is wrought with fraud? Now you’re saying the system works.

Or do I have you mistaken for someone else.

If you didn't know this shit storm was going to happen when several states sent out mail in ballots en masse then frankly you're either stupid or a Democratic operative.

Tight controls simply aren't being followed. Those who say they are foolhardy at best, complicit at worse. This is a democratic pollsters wet dream.

We need an audit. We DEMAND an audit. Doesn't matter if a recount is legally compelled or not.

Audits are required under the law. Your desire for one has no relevance and no impact on the end result.

Weren’t you just complaining that the system failed and is wrought with fraud? Now you’re saying the system works.

Or do I have you mistaken for someone else. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

No, you just failed to comprehend what I said whether on purpose or to be obtuse, I do not know.


The "system" is the vote, the count and any court action that follows. They are all part of "the system"and some parts may work well, some not so well and there could be fraud, there could be mistakes like the Penn. SC obviously made, like not letting poll watchers close enough "if" that happened. A court will decide that and perhaps offer a remedy that could change the count without affecting the outcome, which the court will decide. The fact that the courts will decide this, is proof that the system works as well as it can be expected to with sometimes bias judges which we pretty much can't do anything about but it's better than no judges at all.



How the hell can a lawyer not understand such basic concepts of law? They can't, which leads me to believe that you say things you know are not true because, well, because that's who you are, just like Trump, you'll say anything you please and don't carer what anybody thinks.



I'm sure if you are a lawyer and I have my doubts, surely you have heard a judge say, "present your evidence" and the lawyer turns over affidavits. Does the judge say "no, affidavits are not evidence"? Of course not. He or she may decide that without corroborating evidence the affidavits don't amount to "proof" but they sure as hell are evidence. The judge could say the evidence you have submitted does not meet the rules of evidence and therefore after a judges consideration is deemed not to be evidence that will be allowed but before a judge hears it, the lawyer is calling it evidence.

Audits are required under the law. Your desire for one has no relevance and no impact on the end result. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

No impact on the end result? How the hell would you know that before any court decision? You can't possibly be a lawyer or if you are, you are the worst lawyer I have ever run across.


Of course it is possible ( but not likely) that after hearing these suits, a judge could make a ruling throwing out the results.


You're telling us that is impossible?



Weren't we told that the SC stole the election from Gore? That they overturned a decision that would have given it to Gore

Trump had the mental capacity of a 3-year-old even in his adulthood. He could only speak in short sentences and phrases. Dressed as a girl, he performed in various sideshows throughout his life..and then by an accident he was elected President for a few years

You’re slower than I at first thought. What you and wimp Dixie desire has no impact on actions take by any court. Context matters.

I’ve already explained to you about affidavits and what they are used for.

You’re slower than I at first thought. What you and wimp Dixie desire has no impact on actions take by any court. Context matters.

I’ve already explained to you about affidavits and what they are used for. Originally Posted by 1blackman1

All you have is insults and bigotry! Sucks to be you.