FBI Finally Looking Into Significant Voter Fraud Claims Pertaining to Hundreds of Thousands of Ballots in Multiple States

There is a lot of evidence but is it enough to change hearts, minds, and assholes? Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

Looks like we do.

The hearts and minds of America woke up and this country changed assholes.

The rest of it is typical bunker clownspeak for "WAAAHHHHH WAAAAHHHHH WAAAAHHHHH!"

There is legal precedent going back over 200 years to do this. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

That doesn't exactly make it advisable. Actions have consequences.. and if they opt to do it without a court saying "Yes, there was fraud, widespread fraud, etc"... there is going to be chaos the likes of which have never been seen.

That doesn't exactly make it advisable. Actions have consequences.. and if they opt to do it without a court saying "Yes, there was fraud, widespread fraud, etc"... there is going to be chaos the likes of which have never been seen. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

well you have this one right

yeah back up go the barricades and plywood

since the thought was leftists won, the barricades and plywood came down and cities weren't destroyed and innocent people weren't hurt,

because we all know conservatives don't burn loot assault murder and destroy

when truth wins and leftists don't get their way, well we all know what to expect

Not saying you're fully wrong...


However...


Do you think those who are convinced there is fraud are going to remain peaceful if Trump doesn't win his legal challenges?



And in terms of "getting their way"... right now, according to the numbers, Biden is the winner of the election. There have been a multitude of dismissed court cases both in left and right leaning courtrooms. Anything less than Biden swearing in on the 21st of January without a drastic change in the court system-- is going to be met with an issue. Think logically-- what would the right have done if Clinton screamed fraud for 2 months and successfully managed to get in the White House back in 2016 because of it? You cannot convince me it would have been peaceful.

Not saying you're fully wrong...


However...


Do you think those who are convinced there is fraud are going to remain peaceful if Trump doesn't win his legal challenges?



And in terms of "getting their way"... right now, according to the numbers, Biden is the winner of the election. There have been a multitude of dismissed court cases both in left and right leaning courtrooms. Anything less than Biden swearing in on the 21st of January without a drastic change in the court system-- is going to be met with an issue. Think logically-- what would the right have done if Clinton screamed fraud for 2 months and successfully managed to get in the White House back in 2016 because of it? You cannot convince me it would have been peaceful. Originally Posted by Grace Preston

she screamed fraud for 4 years but the only difference is she had no point only lies, but she was able to get the Obama regime and its sycophants in operation for a three year assault on truth

and to fight for truth is a tad different than not caring about truth just about winning

people I know can accept honest votes no matter how they go

but I get where you are coming from

that's why dims should want to be an open book and have integrity if theres nothing to hide and want to let light shine on this election

but they don't want that

all I want is the truth to come out, whatever that is

Y'know.. the rhetoric about the "Dims not wanting an open book" doesn't necessarily hold water when the CIC is making all sorts of claims about fraud on Twitter-- while his legal team flat out states that they are NOT alleging fraud in the courtroom. Gee-- wonder which one is under oath.....

Voter confidence at all time low. Only way to restore faith is to get new machines not affiliated with soros! And voting only in person with very few exceptions!

There is a lot of evidence but is it enough to change hearts, minds, and assholes? We have counties with 480% voter turnout. We have people saying that they were told at the polling place that they already voted by mail. We have 200 ballots at a mental institution but without room numbers (probably everyone of them a Biden ballot). We can now show that some people voted in two different states but the left will say that it is not enough to challenge the election.

Here is what is happening now for the slow of thought, winning the election outright is off the table for Trump. Too many fraudulent votes mixed up with real votes Instead, the action in the state houses. If Trump can get some counties or cities to decide that they cannot certify the election results and those counties contain enough votes to affect the outcome of the state election, they the state cannot, or should not certify the results. According to the US Constitution, the state house in a state must send up a slate of electors on the 14th of December. The Republicans control the state houses in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Utah. The state houses would have to decide whether or not to send democrat or republican electors. There is legal precedent going back over 200 years to do this. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

You are so full of it. If any of that were true it would be reported at a legitimate news source somewhere. 480% voter turnout, 200 ballots at a mental institution. What a load.

In court Trump's lawyers don't claim fraud because they would be lying. They only say this shit in public because lying to morons isn't illegal.

You are so full of it. If any of that were true it would be reported at a legitimate news source somewhere. 480% voter turnout, 200 ballots at a mental institution. What a load.

In court Trump's lawyers don't claim fraud because they would be lying. They only say this shit in public because lying to morons isn't illegal. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Excellent point.

You are so full of it. If any of that were true it would be reported at a legitimate news source somewhere. 480% voter turnout, 200 ballots at a mental institution. What a load.

In court Trump's lawyers don't claim fraud because they would be lying. They only say this shit in public because lying to morons isn't illegal. Originally Posted by txdot-guy

Barelycorn is parroting lies once again. Of course he is not bright enough to realize it.

What's all this we shit? You don't have a fucking thing. Non of what you say has been verified by any court with sworn testimony. It is all trumped up bullshit.

There is a lot of evidence but is it enough to change hearts, minds, and assholes? We have counties with 480% voter turnout. We have people saying that they were told at the polling place that they already voted by mail. We have 200 ballots at a mental institution but without room numbers (probably everyone of them a Biden ballot). We can now show that some people voted in two different states but the left will say that it is not enough to challenge the election.

Here is what is happening now for the slow of thought, winning the election outright is off the table for Trump. Too many fraudulent votes mixed up with real votes Instead, the action in the state houses. If Trump can get some counties or cities to decide that they cannot certify the election results and those counties contain enough votes to affect the outcome of the state election, they the state cannot, or should not certify the results. According to the US Constitution, the state house in a state must send up a slate of electors on the 14th of December. The Republicans control the state houses in Pennsylvania, Michigan, Georgia, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Utah. The state houses would have to decide whether or not to send democrat or republican electors. There is legal precedent going back over 200 years to do this. Originally Posted by the_real_Barleycorn

The onus is on trump and his tards to prove fraud or illegal votes. So far none has been proven not even remotely close. Every court just kicks the dumbasses out.

she screamed fraud for 4 years but the only difference is she had no point only lies, but she was able to get the Obama regime and its sycophants in operation for a three year assault on truth

and to fight for truth is a tad different than not caring about truth just about winning

people I know can accept honest votes no matter how they go

but I get where you are coming from

that's why dims should want to be an open book and have integrity if theres nothing to hide and want to let light shine on this election

but they don't want that

all I want is the truth to come out, whatever that is Originally Posted by nevergaveitathought

significant?

Voter confidence at all time low. Only way to restore faith is to get new machines not affiliated with soros! And voting only in person with very few exceptions! Originally Posted by winn dixie

Good...hope the Trumptards in Georgia think that!!

significant?

Originally Posted by matchingmole

Who's got two thumbs and has influenced this board so?

















This guy!