election evidence website

post # 14 is suspect!
too bad he cant edit!

bahahahahahhahahahhahahhahhaha hhahhahhahha

Is there anyone out there who still isn't clear about what watching FOX does? Okay. Last time!

{staff edit- CK} Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

TSK, TSK, TSK...

Try newsmax

Try newsmax Originally Posted by rexdutchman

So, I shouldn't trust the main stream media, but I should trust newsmax?

So, I shouldn't trust the main stream media, but I should trust newsmax?

Originally Posted by pfunkdenver

lsm was reporting a "Fart" 24/7 for several days! As if it was really news worthy and making jokes of it!
No mention of how many were killed in chicago that weekend or any thing of substance!

mic microphone check..........

No mention of how many were killed in chicago that weekend or any thing of substance! Originally Posted by winn dixie

You and I both know the main stream media report many, many things of substance, daily.

Newsmax, while not dishonest, definitely slants to the right.

TSK, TSK, TSK...
Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

I was warned. I went with it because it didn't mention any specific unmentionables. Just druƍs. Sure, the implication is illegal druƍs. But all it said was druƍs. Cough medicine is a druƍ.

Not necessarily trying to rationalize, just walking the line. I hope I don't get pointed just for mentioning the "word" druƍs.





Obscenity Case Files: People v. Bruce (The Lenny Bruce Trial)

They said that he was sick ’cause he didn’t play by the rules

He just showed the wise men of his day to be nothing more than fools

They stamped him and they labeled him like they do with pants and shirts

He fought a war on a battlefield where every victory hurts

Lenny Bruce was bad, he was the brother that you never had

http://cbldf.org/about-us/case-files...y-bruce-trial/

Despite Bruce’s efforts, the court found his performances “obscene, indecent, immoral and impure within the meaning of the [New York] penal code” and sentenced him to “four months in the workhouse.” In its final opinion, the court concluded that Bruce’s act “appealed to prurient interest,” was “patently offensive to the average person in the community,” and lacked “redeeming social importance.” Bruce would go on to appeal the conviction, but died of a [chemical] overdose before his case reached an appellate court.

Legal Opinions Relating to Obscenity Prosecutions of Comedian Lenny Bruce


http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/project...decisions.html

Dissent in PEOPLE v. BRUCE

While the judicial process is a very finely finished instrument of the solution of purely legal controversies, for which it was fashioned, it is suggested it may be a dangerous or at best a most clumsy tool when used to solve problems of policy or politics. Can there be rational doubt that there is a better method of finding a community standard as to obscenity (or solving other graver social problems) than this limited judicial process, and judges who are subjected to an almost endless stream of gaseous hot air and some smoke from counsel's arguments, briefs, and records, which swirl around judicial benches not unlike those gaseous volcanic emissions which developed the Delphic oracle of old? Has not human knowledge, science and art of self-government made more substantial progress?

Will it ever? Judge me.















Maybe I should say chemicals.

I'll update what, if anything, happens.

deleted dublicate

This is your brain not on FOX.
















Can't wait to see the sequel.

You think this old Jew is still in it?

deleted dublicate [SIC]

This is your brain not on CNN.

Can't wait to see the sequel.

You think this old Jew is still in it? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

FTFY!

Fake news should be suppressed. Someone being investigated is not news. An indictment is news.

How often do we see this right here? A few weeks ago, the New York Post wrote a story about Hunter Biden being investigated. Fox News reported this weeks before the New York Post did.


Twitter and Facebook went so far as to ban anybody from talking about this story.


Now the New York Times and Washington Post are warning that Joe Biden may be in trouble over Hunter's activities.


This picture could not be more clear as to what happened. There was a conspiracy to keep this story out of the news for political reasons and it worked much to the shame of journalism or so called journalism where now the intent is no longer to inform the public about the facts but to insure "your side" wins by hiding those facts. Originally Posted by HedonistForever

Fake news should be suppressed. Someone being investigated is not news. An indictment is news. Originally Posted by royamcr

The entire post is wrong. Who determines what fake news is? Thats suppression of the First!
Someone being investigated is news! lsm reports every investigation on Trump!
Yes an indictment is news. Youre correct here only!

Trump = Fake news, so pretty much everything he says. 30 days is so much better sounding than 4 more years. Fuck Trump.

SNICK

Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

These people smell bad the Biden smell of old piss, but Trump people just plan smell,