I am not claiming he didn't have an experience that didn't live up to what he wanted. I'm not saying his review is "fake".I have a possible explanation for part of his bad review. When I saw her a couple of days ago she wanted me to "massage" her new boobs just as much as I wanted to massage them. Maybe I overdid it and he was the next appointment? lol
What I am saying is that to use your term it's dishonest in that it misreports facts and doesn't elaborate on the actual details so people can decide for themselves. Things like using the phrase tattoos to cover "wounds" show how over the top his report was.
It's completely fair to report a bad session. I don't think it's fair to go the extra step and exaggerate and slander. Originally Posted by Sightseeing
I am just going to say that my experience with Elin was COMPLETELY different than his and "kind of" leave it at that. I am the last person who would want to discourage "bad but honest" reviews around here, and I will concede both that Elin does look "40ish" to me, but a VERY good looking 40, I will also concede that one my first visit with Elin she was a bit slow to warm up to me, but once she warmed up I thoroughly enjoyed my time with her, enough to have seen her several times now.
Now where it comes to her tattoo being used to "cover her wounds" I completely agree that is WAY over the top, as it is way too high up on her body to be covering a C section, and way too small to be covering open heart surgery. lol
I am going to resist the temptation to "pile on" where it comes to this review and this reviewer, but I can't say that my experience/s with Elin were even the slightest bit like what he describes.